On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 06:53:58PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> There are five proposed blockers. My professional guesstimate *at this
> point* is that at least four of them will probably be rejected, though
> that could change with more data (attention pjones: if #1418360 and
> #1451071 are mor
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:34:16AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> More criteria time, folks!
>
> So we managed to get the Windows multi-boot criterion revised and an OS
> X multi-boot criterion added, but we did not yet manage to come to a
> consensus on exactly what should be required for Linux
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:44:49AM -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> I have had now a more detailed look into the Bios menues - I am really
> a no expert in things like Bios. There is in case of my Acer E15
> E5-571G a button "Security" leading to "Select an UEFI file as trusted
> for executing"
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 07:15:46PM +0200, poma wrote:
> On 16.10.2014 23:23, poma wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > Cleanup: grubby-8.35-4.fc21.x86_64
> > 440/441
> > Cleanup: libmwaw-.3.2-2.fc21.x86_64
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 07:18:37AM +0200, poma wrote:
> On 08.05.2014 16:05, Peter Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:21:44AM +0200, poma wrote:
> >>
> >> $ rpmbuild -ba ./SPECS/syslinux.spec
> >> ...
> >>
> >> $ find -name s
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:21:44AM +0200, poma wrote:
>
> $ rpmbuild -ba ./SPECS/syslinux.spec
> ...
>
> $ find -name syslinux*.rpm
> ./SRPMS/syslinux-6.02-4.fc21.src.rpm
> ./RPMS/x86_64/syslinux-perl-6.02-4.fc21.x86_64.rpm
> ./RPMS/x86_64/syslinux-6.02-4.fc21.x86_64.rpm
> ./RPMS/x86_64/syslinux-
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 04:53:05PM +0200, poma wrote:
> On 14.04.2014 15:53, poma wrote:
> >
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all&view=tree&method=livecd&order=-id
> >
> > syslinux/isolinux 6.02 breaks live image boot on x86_64 (missing
> > ldlinux.c32)
> > https://bugzilla.redh
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 05:54:33PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 12:39 +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
> > On 14/06/13 12:31, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 12:28 +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, I configured the wireless network prior to g
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:55:40AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 08:55 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> > Hi all testers,
> >
> > the "jumbo" update from this morning (Germany!) includes an update of
> > grub2 and grub2-tools to the version given in the subject.
> >
> > Pro
On 06/28/2012 10:08 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
Having sent that mail it became obvious that what's happened is that
your
new x220 board doesn't have the efi boot variable set. Some machines
allow
you to boot from a file, in which case it'll be
/efi/fedora/grubx64.efi .
If your firmware doesn't have
On 06/28/2012 09:40 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 28.06.12 09:29, Peter Jones (pjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
Having sent that mail it became obvious that what's happened is that your
new x220 board doesn't have the efi boot variable set. Some machines allow
you to boot from
On 06/28/2012 09:25 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
On 06/28/2012 09:11 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
If you are knowledgeable about UEFI, I'll welcome your advice. This is the
issue I encountered:
1. I enabled UEFI mode in BIOS in Lenovo X220 (more exactly I set UEFI as the
preferred method).
2. I inst
On 06/28/2012 09:11 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
If you are knowledgeable about UEFI, I'll welcome your advice. This is the
issue I encountered:
1. I enabled UEFI mode in BIOS in Lenovo X220 (more exactly I set UEFI as the
preferred method).
2. I installed Fedora 17.
3. "Fedora" item appeared in BIO
On 05/26/2012 10:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 19:00 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
>> G.Wolfe Woodbury gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> The problem is that grub2 selects inappropriate video modes for ATI cards
>>> The GFXMODE variable preselects a mode for grub2.
>>> I've had to do
On 10/14/2011 12:26 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> With todays f16 yum update, first I saw this..
>
> ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
> grub2 conflicts with (installed) grub-1:0.97-80.fc16.x86_64
>
> Which I got around by doing --exclude=grub2
> When everything else had updated, I did another
On 10/12/2011 11:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:29 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> On 10/12/2011 04:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed
>>> stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new grub-efi
>>
On 09/08/2011 02:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 19:19 +0100, agraham wrote:
>
>>> I'm still not super happy with the wording, but I guess it's clearer.
>>> Any better ideas?
>>
>> Suggestions:
>>
>> A Fedora release must be able host virtual guest instances of the same
>> Fed
17 matches
Mail list logo
