>
> Given the urgency of the situation, please schedule a blocker meeting for
> today (formally or informally).
I'll be ready to run a meeting at the usual 1600 UTC time in
#fedora-blocker-review.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
can start from QA and take part in
> some works of Fedora Cloud.
>
>
>
> It`s about 5 years ago, I am start using Fedora 16. And when I come back,
> it`s 27 now... Anyway, it is really a fancy work. When I have no idea how to
> contribute to it, Mike Ruckman`s commen
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 03:23:02PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. We did a
> pretty good job of checking in this week, and I don't think there's
> anything pressing that needs a meeting this week. The status of Beta is
> a bit of a mess w
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> I don't really understand this, and I haven't read the meeting log, so I
> apologize if my questions are dumb.
I was in the meeting, and I was confused - so your questions aren't
dumb. :)
> Why would we dictate that Editions/Spins can
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 03:38:00PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! Time for another proposal :)
>
> We currently kinda bundle the checks for correct artwork and 'release
> identification' (stuff that identifies the release, like 'Welcome to
> Fedora 26!' etc.) into two test cases that al
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:17:27AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So, at the Alpha go/no-go we discussed this bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437299
>
> and agreed that with current behaviour of anaconda and dnf, blocking
> Alpha release on it didn't make sense.
>
> The re
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 05:39:20PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> At the Go/No-Go meeting today, we agreed in principle that major bugs
> in virt guest functionality should come under the Alpha criteria, not
> the Beta criteria as before. When we established the virt criteria, use
>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:02:14PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! I've got a question for everyone who helps out with release
> validation testing. It's related to the project to build a new system
> for submitting those results. We have a ticket for designing that
> system:
>
> https:/
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:41:57AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as discussed in "future of official optical media support in Fedora" thread
> in devel list [1], we agreed to decrease the importance and testing of
> optical media support for Fedora release composes, and block on just sever
> - Original Message -
> From: "Allan Mwenda"
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 12:54:35 AM
> Subject: First Bug Report
> Hell everyone,
> So I posted my first bug on bugzilla, not sure if i did it exactly right
> but i gave it my best shot. Still learni
Greetings list!
I wanted to give a heads up to the list that due to some personal stuff, I
will be taking a hiatus from my regularly scheduled activities. I'll still
be filing test results and sporadically responding to emails - but you won't
be likely to find me in our usual meetings and whatnot.
# F23 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-10-26
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It looks like we get to have at least one more F23 blocker review
meeting before release (isn't that exciting!?). We have 2 newly proposed
blockers to look at, and several accept
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 02:35:11PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Recently, we discovered a bug in gnutls that caused Cockpit to be
> unreachable by recent versions of Google Chrome. It was ambiguous what
> the release criteria actually means,
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:41:56AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Thursday, October 22, 2015 02:35:11 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Recently, we discovered a bug in gnutls that caused Cockpit to be
> > unreachable by recent versions of Google Chrome. It was ambiguous what
> > the release crite
# F23 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-10-19
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Last week we did an out-of-sync blocker review because bugs were
stacking up and Go/No-Go is coming up. Even though we cleaned out the
list, we're already back up to 6 proposed b
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 03:05:42PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Currently, we have a number of blocking criterion in Fedora Server
> around domain membership that the machine must be able to join a
> domain and that a user must be able to lo
# F23 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-10-05
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's that time of the week again: blocker review time! There's currently
11 proposed blockers we need to look through. We'll be meeting at our
usual time and location.
If you ha
# F23 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-09-28
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's that time again: Blocker review time! We currently have 4 proposed
blockers for Final. It'd be good to meet and knock them out. Should be
a short meeting.
If you have time
Well, it appears that Bugzilla is currently experiencing some issues, so
we had to move today's blocker review to tomorrow. Providing that
Bugzilla is up and working by 1600 UTC tomorrow (2015-09-22), we'll be
having the blocker review then.
Thanks!
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http:
# F23 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-09-21
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
We're getting down to the final stretch for Fedora 23 with the Beta
release happening this Tuesday. Great work! To make sure we stay on
schedule, we'll be having a blocker review
# F23 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-09-14
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Earlier this week we knocked out a bunch of blocker proposals, and come
Monday we'll need to do the same. Luckily though, there's currently only
1/1 proposed blocker for Beta/Fin
With this coming Monday being a US holiday, I propose that we cancel the
Blocker review meeting. We're currently sitting at 3/1 proposals for
Beta and Final - so I don't think it'll put us too far behind.
Of course, if someone else wants to run the meeting in my stead, that's
also fine. Otherwise,
# F23 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-08-31
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's that time of week again - Blocker Review! This time around we have
1/3 proposed blockers for Beta/Final. We'll meet up at our regular time
after the QA meeting to go through
# F23 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-08-24
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
This week we had an out of band blocker review where we plowed through
a bunch of proposals. Next week we'll be having another meeting (at
the usual day and time) to finish the r
week. Does
this Thursday (2015-08-20) at 16:00 UTC work for people? If there's a better
time, please
respond to the test list and we can find a better window to run the review.
Thanks!
Mike Ruckman
___
test-announce mailing list
With the recent decision to ship Alpha, Flock being next week and people
traveling, I propose that we cancel the next Blocker Review meeting.
Currently there are 2/4 proposals for Beta/Final - so if someone wants
to run the meeting, go for it. Otherwise, enjoy your blocker review free
time :)
--
# F23 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-08-03
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hey, look at me sending out an announcement this time! Next week we only
have a couple proposed blockers to go through: 1/2/1 (Alpha/Beta/Final).
Also, we have 5 proposed FEs to
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-07-13
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
With branch almost here (this Tuesday), and freeze a couple weeks after
that (2015-07-28), I think it's time we started getting back into
regular blocker review meetings. This we
Greetings fellow testers!
As we only have one blocker proposed, [0] I propose we cancel tomorrow's
blocker review meeting. Everyone can vote in ticket as their time allows.
If someone thinks it'd be better to have the meeting, please ping in IRC
and we'll go ahead and have the meeting.
Thanks!
[
F23 is about to branch [0] and it's time we started thinking about what
we'd want to have a test day for. There are several changes accepted
already for F23, and more that have yet to be decided [1]. You can find
the list here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/23/ChangeSet
Please take some
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 01:33:19PM -0600, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> Since we decided right after the QA meeting that I'd be filling in as
> the QA rep for this meeting - I figured I'd ping the list to see if
> anyone had anything else they wanted to include?
>
> Kami
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 08:57:26AM -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Hi, folks! So I'm following up again on the request from the Council
> > that we send someone to report on the QA project's status. The proposed
> > date was 2015-06-08.
> >
> > At the last QA meeting (on 2015-05-04) I volunteered to
As per the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Final Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing.
Content information, including changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6166#comment:12. Please see
the following pages for download links and testing instructions.
The minutes to this meeting can be found here:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-05-18/f22-blocker-review.2015-05-18-16.00.html
Thanks!
--
// Mike
--
Fedora QA
freenode: roshi
http://roshi.fedorapeople.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 16:00:03 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-04-06/f22-blocker-review.2015-04-06-
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-04-06
# Time: 1700 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers! Tomorrow we'll be having another blocker review
directly after the QA meeting. Currently we have 7 proposed blockers for
Beta and none proposed for Final. If y
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 16:04:24 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-03-30/f22-blocker-review.2015-03-30-
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-03-30
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Well, this email is going out a bit late, but I'm sure you all know it's
that time of the week again! We've had a few more proposals since our
meeting last week. We currently hav
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 16:02:18 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-03-23/f22-blocker-review.2015-03-23-
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-03-16
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's coming up to that time of the week again: Blocker Review! Currently
we have 5/1 proposed blockers for Beta and Final. Again, we're meeting
at 1600 UTC right after the QA mee
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 16:05:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-03-09/f22-blocker-review.2015-03-09-
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 04:36:51PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> > Greetings fellow testers! At the last QA meeting [0] we decided to break
> > the bits from the migration overview [1] into manageable chunks. So I
> > di
Greetings fellow testers! At the last QA meeting [0] we decided to break
the bits from the migration overview [1] into manageable chunks. So I
did that, and they live here [2] on our trac instance. If you have some
time, take a look at the tickets and assign it to yourself if you're so
inclined.
I
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:58:29PM +, Alexander Bisogianis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed the latest nightly alpha, selecting KDE Plasma as the
> desktop.
> After installation, in KDM, for some reason Enlightenment is the default DE.
>
> Why is Enlightenment installed in the first place a
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 17:16:09 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-03-02/f22-blocker-review.2015-03-02-
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-03-02
# Time: 1700 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Another week and a couple TCs later, it's time for some blocker review
goodness! Also, as an added bonus, Alpha Freeze is upon us so we get to
look over FE bugs as well. Currentl
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-02-23
# Time: 1700 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's that time of the week again! After another week of testing we
have 4 proposed Alpha blockers and 2 proposed for final.
If you want to take a look at the proposed or accepte
Greetings Testers!
With the F22 switch from yum to dnf as a package manager, there was a need to
figure out what the scope would be for QA testing. Naturally, to define the
scope for a subset, I had to figure out (at least in a general sense) how
large the complete set is. There's a multitude of c
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 17:30:53 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-02-16/f22-blocker-review.2015-02-16-
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-02-16
# Time: 1700 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's Blocker Review time again! While we don't yet have an Alpha TC to
test, testing against rawhide has continued. The results have yielded a
couple proposed blockers: 3 Alpha a
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F22 Blocker Review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 17:00:30 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-02-09/fedora-blocker-review.2015-02-
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:38:55PM +0530, Sudhir Dharanendraiah wrote:
>
> On 02/06/2015 04:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>Kickstart Delivery
> >>>
> >>> Not really a criterion change, but we still list a diskette as a
> >>>supported
> >>> delivery mechanism [0]. Should we remove this, or d
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:21:53PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 11:24 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
> > Greetings testers!
> >
> > While looking into the affects of the yum/dnf migration I noticed
> > some cleanup
> > opportunities with the
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-02-09
# Time: 1700 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
So far this week we've found 1 proposed Alpha blocker as well as 5
proposed for Final. If you want to take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers, the full list can be foun
Greetings testers!
While looking into the affects of the yum/dnf migration I noticed some cleanup
opportunities with the release criteria and thought I'd email the list before
making any changes.
Beta
Package set selection
Should we update this to say "when using any network install imag
Another testing cycle is finally upon us, and it's about time we got
some Test Days scheduled for the F22 cycle. The Anaconda team has
already requested a test day [0] and there are several other changes
coming to F22 that could use some testing love - a full list can be
found here:
http://fedor
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 17:06:14 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-02-02/f22-blocker-review.2015-02-02-
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-02-02
# Time: 1700 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's that time of week again, time for some Blocker Review! Currently we
have 1 Alpha and 1 Beta blocker proposed - so it should be a short
meeting. We'll be sticking with the ne
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:37:56PM +0100, Abdelhak Bougouffa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My name is Abdelhak BOUGOUFFA, I'm from Algeria
> I'm a student in InfoTronics field (Informatics and Electronics), I'm a
> C, Python, PHP, JavaScript developer
>
> I'm also a skilled GNU/Linux administrator, I think th
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 17:00:18 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-01-26/f22-blocker-review.2015-01-26-
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-01-26
# Time: 1700 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
I seem to have forgotten how to use the "send" button on my mail client,
so this annoucnement is getting out a bit late. Apologies for that!
We've got another blocker review in a
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:20:48PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Hum, so thinking about it a bit further, I'd like to add one more
> thing to this proposal.
>
>
> On reflection I think we *should* require install of release blocking
> desktops and minimal package set to work with the froze
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:46:34PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Here's a ping on this (as I only got feedback from Mike before -
> anyone else?) and a modification: I'd like to extend the Beta
> criterion to read:
>
> "When installing with a release-blocking dedicated installer image,
> the
I filled in a gap that zodbot missed when it died in the middle of the
meeting, but these should be complete.
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 16:06:42 UTC. The full logs ar
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:25:00AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! So I don't think we have anything particular to discuss at a
> meeting tomorrow, thus according to the policy of not wasting people's
> time with unnecessary meetings, I propose we cancel it. If anyone did
> have someth
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-01-12
# Time: 1700 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's that time of week again, time for some Blocker Review! While it
might seem like I've lost track of what day it is again (which happens,
I admit), we discussed it this week a
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 16:02:15 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-01-07/f22-blocker-review.2015-01-07
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 04:10:39AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > # First F22 Blocker Review meeting
> > # Date: 2015-01-07
> > # Time: 16:00 UTC
> > # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
> >
> > While it's not the usual time to start blocker reviews, after much
> > deliberation at
# First F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-01-07
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
While it's not the usual time to start blocker reviews, after much
deliberation at today's QA meeting, it was decided to start the blocker
review process earlier than usua
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:21:11AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I propose we re-word the Alpha criterion to:
>
> "When installing with a release-blocking dedicated installer image,
> the installer must be able to install the default package set."
>
> and add a Beta criterion:
>
> "When in
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 03:57:05PM -0300, Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote:
> Hello folks
>
> My name is Carlos Morel-Riquelme i'm from Chile and i'm contributor for
> Fedora Project since F20 in Testing ( Bodhi ) though i start using Fedora
> since F15, also i'm student of computer engineering and i h
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 16:04:24 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-12-03/f21-blocker-review.2014-12-03-
Greetings testers! Typically we'd have a blocker review meeting
tomorrow, but with Go/No-Go this Thursday and a pretty solid RC out and
being tested, we might not need one. Currently there are no proposed
blockers (and let's hope we've handled all of them), so we won't be
having a meeting.
OTOH, i
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 16:01:34 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-11-26/f21-blocker-review.2014-11-26-
# F21 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2014-11-26
# Time: 16:00 UTC (run "date -d '2014-11-26 16:00 UTC'" to see local time)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
While we just had a out of band blocker review today after the QA meeting, we'll
still be having our regularly scheduled
Greetings, all!
Tomorrow (or today for those of you not in North America) will be the first
Atomic Testday! The Fedora Atomic host is a new image designed to securely and
easily run Docker containers - all based on Project Atomic [0]. Because it's
new ground, testing is required for a successful r
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by pschindl at 16:03:55 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-11-19/f21-blocker-review.2014-11
# F21 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2014-11-19
# Time: 16:00 UTC (run "date -d '2014-11-19 16:00 UTC'" to see local time)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's that time of the week again! Things have been moving along smoothly after
the Beta release - and now Freeze is upon
Hey all,
Back in late October we agreed that not having AMIs uploaded was something we
should block on [0], but I felt like the "must boot" criteria didn't really
fit. I proposed to the cloud WG [1] a new criteria: "Cloud images must be
available in the following supported service registries: Ama
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 16:03:53 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-11-12/f21-blocker-review.2014-11-12-
# F21 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2014-11-12
# Time: 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 08:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's that time of the week again! Last week we had 15 proposed blockers, which
we managed to get down to 4 or so. This week we have 11 to go through. Also
Greetings Testers!
Tomorrow we'll be holding a testday for the Server product. Along with general
testing there will be a focus on freeIPA, openLMI, cockpit and Rolekit. If you
have some time, or want to get more familiar with all the new features Server
brings, drop by the #fedora-test-day channe
# F21 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2014-11-05
# Time: 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 08:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
The first TC of Final is upon us! Along with that, we've changed up the release
schedule a bit so we need to get to finding and knocking out these blocker
# F21 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2014-11-05
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
The first TC of Final is upon us! Along with that, we've changed up the release
schedule a bit so we need to get to finding and knocking out these blocker
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:29:44PM -0800, M. Miles Clark wrote:
> Hi All -
>
> I've been running Fedora for a while and decided to install the F21
> alpha on my new laptop. It's pretty good, but there are a few problems,
> so I thought I'd see what I could do to help out with testing.
>
> I'm p
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 16:05:38 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-10-29/f21-blocker-review.2014-10-29-
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 16:03:34 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-10-22/f21-blocker-review.2014-10-22-
# F21 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2014-10-22
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
We've already had one blocker review meeting this week (which is likely
why I forgot to send this email until now), but it's time for another!
With Go/No
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 16:04:23 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-10-15/f21-blocker-review.2014-10-15-
# F21 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2014-10-15
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
As testing of Beta TC3 continues, it's time for another blocker review meeting.
Currently we have 3 proposed blockers and 2 proposed FEs. We have 10 accep
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 11:49:33PM +0800, Marle Cua-chin wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm very excited to join the Fedora QA team, I would like to share
> whatever knowledge I have with regards to Fedora/Linux to the community and
> also to rest of the planet.
>
> I love using fedora as my personal wor
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 15:58:48 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-10-03/f21-blocker-review.2014-10-03-
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 07:56:43PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks!
>
> I spent some time today fiddling around with the installation validation
> matrix. I haven't applied the changes to Beta TC1 to give us some time
> to review/tweak them, but they're in the template:
>
> https://fed
Hey fellow fedorans!
I've made some slight edits to the existing "Test Overview" [0] on the wiki
and would like some feedback. It's meant as a high-level overview of all the
things we think we need to test for the Fedora 21 cloud product.
It's not intended to be an exhaustive list, just a basic
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 05:54:42PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> We kind of already have this, really, in that we don't *explicitly* say
> that all the requirements about desktop stuff don't apply to non-desktop
> installs, but everyone just understands it. We could add some fairly
> short
# F21 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2014-10-03
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Towards the end of today's blocker review meeting, we decided it would be good
for us to have a another meeting this week to deal with the unusually large
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 15:58:52 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-10-01/f21-blocker-review.2014-10-01-
Hello fellow Fedorans! I told cloud@ that I would work on some criteria to go
over, and here's what I have so far. These are pretty rough, but I think
they're servicable enough for the time being. There are only two I've thought
of for Beta, but I'm probably forgetting something. Patches welcome :
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 05:29:07PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks. So as I've been playing with relval, I've been wondering why
> we have 'TC' and 'RC' results page categories. That is, we have a
> top-level 'Test Results' category, then we have a category for each
> release which is a m
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:38:12AM +0100, Napoleon Quashie wrote:
> I have been using Fedora 21 since the alpha release and overall it has
> worked wonderfully (it has never one crashed and I use it every day), even
> to the extent of noticing a reduction in the memory consumed and processor
> usag
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
