On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 12:03:31PM -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 06/04/2013 11:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 10:36 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> I attempted to update my 19 this morning...what does this mean ?
>
> [frank@franksfedora19 ~]$ s
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 06:20:52PM +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> How much time?
> --
> Best Regards,
> Igor Gnatenko
Hopefully the next F19 stable push will happen today. Usually pushes
happen every day or so, but the signing & starting of the push are
manual processes, so it varies.
luke
--
tes
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 01:36:06PM +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> In bodhi package karma equal stable, but
> Pushed: False
> Why?
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/control-center-3.8.1.5-1.fc19?_csrf_token=36f159c87ba1ff882660c989e9ac2377d645d1c7
It's still pending and will go to stab
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 09:45:58AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 10:52 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
>
> > Out of 23255 total updates, 6375 received feedback (27.41%)
> > Out of 1259 total unique karma submitters, the top 50 are:
> > * autoqa (28787
Here are some fresh metrics generated today containing some new proventester
data.
Eventually these reports will be automatically generated and exposed via the
bodhi web interface. In the mean time, suggestions for new statistics to keep
track of are welcome.
luke
==
Excerpts from Brian Pepple's message of Sun May 01 16:58:47 -0400 2011:
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> > Today I was not able to use fedora-easy-karma, I get the following errors:
>
>
>
> > Anyone else is seeing this ?
>
> Yeah, I ran across the same thing. Haven't
> ACTION ITEMS
> ===
> 1. jlaska - check-in with lmacken on
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2011-January/000742.html
I applied this patch and will be pushing it out to production this week.
luke
--
test mai
Applied. Sorry for the delay, I'll push this into production ASAP.
luke
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 09:04:47PM +0100, François Cami wrote:
> Hello Luke, test@, bodhi@,
>
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:56:42 +0100
> > François Cami wrote:
> >
> >> Th
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 03:10:37PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 20:44 +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > The following Fedora 12 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:
[snip 59 critpath updates]
> Okay, this obviously sucks, and I'm really worried we cann
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 06:43:49PM +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org
> /updates/mailman-2.1.13-6.fc14https://admin.fedoraproject.org
> /updates/cabextract-1.3-1.fc14,libmspack-0.2-0.1.2010072
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:41:50PM +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Fedora Koji Build System
> wrote:
> > Package: Miro
> > NVR: Miro-3.0.3-2.fc13
> > User: bodhi
> > Status: failed
> > Tag Operation: untagged
> > From Tag: dist-f13-updates-testing-pending
>
On 07/15/2010 04:25 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Why is it possible to _delete_ such bodhi update requests,
> so users will have to solve riddles? I cannot even give feedback on
> that package. Please make it impossible to delete bodhi tickets for everything
> that has been pushed.
The next relea
On 06/29/2010 03:50 PM, James Laska wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 12:33 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 12:26 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>>
>>> I just discovered that it might be possible to use the command-line
>>> bodhi tool to gather this information.
>>>
>>> # bo
13 matches
Mail list logo
