Mohan Boddu wrote:
> EOL process takes some time and we cannot delay it to the next day
And why exactly would that be?
I do not think any user would complain about getting updates for one day
longer than originally announced.
Kevin Kof
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Interestingly, my local x86_64 compose did complete, but failed to boot
> with the error message in #1086446, as did the i686 composes from Koji. So
> there seems to be more than one issue here. I don't know yet whether
> 6.02-2.fc21 will work any better t
ome non-Linux (e.g. BIOS) 32-bit binaries (that neither BuildRequire nor
Require any i686 packages) in an x86_64 package (as has been done in the
past) or to require otherwise non-multilib x86_64 setups to ship i686
packages to be able to boot (his subpackage setup).
Kevin Kofler
(
