Heya,
Fedora RISC-V F42 images[1] are almost ready to go GA; new images were
refreshed yesterday, 14Apr2025. (NB: RISC-V is an "alternative" arch.)
Even if you don't have the hardware, the below images should work on
QEMU:
• "Fedora-Server-Host-Generic"
• "Fedora-Cloud-Base-Generic"
Th F42
On 01/21/2014 07:28 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
> On 01/21/2014 01:49 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>
> Or you can simply skip all that and share with us your ideas and
> thoughts how we can improve QA to make it more awesome then it already
> is ;)
> And we can see if we cant find the t
On 06/20/2013 08:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:18:18 +0530
> Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>
>> On 06/20/2013 11:12 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>>> Heya,
>>>
>>> I've been using F19 for a while. For the past couple of days
On 06/20/2013 11:12 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> Heya,
>
> I've been using F19 for a while. For the past couple of days, I don't see
> grub picking up
> latest kernel.
>
> -> Kernel in use (despite rebooting, after installing newer kernels):
> --
&g
Heya,
I've been using F19 for a while. For the past couple of days, I don't see grub
picking up
latest kernel.
-> Kernel in use (despite rebooting, after installing newer kernels):
--
$ uname -r
3.10.0-0.rc2.git1.2.fc20.x86_64
--
-> Available kernels:
--
$ rpm -q kernel
kernel-3.10
>
> Interesting part is a kernel from f18 works, and the 3.10-rc?? from
> rawhide-nodebug works
> as well.
Yes, I can certainly confirm the 3.10 RCs (and rawhide) builds have been
consistently
working for me, as I've been testing them w/ virt-preview kvm packages.
/kashyap
--
test mailing l
On 05/13/2013 02:59 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/12/2013 12:01 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>> Heya,
>>
>> That's what I see while I boot today's Rawhide Kernel.
>
> File a bug
I forgot to notify here that it went away w/ 3.10-rc1
Heya,
That's what I see while I boot today's Rawhide Kernel.
If you need more info, just ping me here.
==
...
[176092.303585] lock(&dev->device_lock);
[176092.307947]
[176092.307947] *** DEADLOCK ***
[176092.307947]
[176092.314943] 2 locks h
On 09/13/2012 02:28 AM, Scott Poore wrote:
> Has anyone done kickstarts with F18 with text only with kvm guest (on F16 or
> F17 host) with virt-install with --nographics?
>
> I thought I'd seen/heard that people had done text installs but, I can't seem
>
> I'm trying this:
>
> virt-install --c
On 09/12/2012 01:41 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2012-09-11 12:54, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 09/11/2012 01:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> Things can go to updates-testing just fine at present. freeze only means
>>> they can't go to 'stable'.
>>>
>>> Unless there's some reason why not which hasn
>
>
> for qemu, i've opened a bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814814
>
>
Just a side note: you may also want to subscribe to Fedora Virt list, where
more Virt devs
hanging out.
v...@lists.fedoraproject.org
/kashyap
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 04/20/2012 10:46 AM, cornel panceac wrote:
> One of the things that sounds interesting in the new fedora is gnome-boxes.
> However, every
> attempt i've made to boot a live cd (tiny core linux) in gnome-boxes, failed
> (nothing in
> journal). I've figured that i can try this also in qemu and s
On 04/12/2012 06:59 PM, David Lehman wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 11:08 +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>> On 04/12/2012 06:41 AM, David Lehman wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 11:08 +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm going giv
On 04/12/2012 06:41 AM, David Lehman wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 11:08 +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm going give it a try w/ btrfs partitioning. Meanwhile, I wasn't keeping
>>> up. Can someone
>>> confirm, does /boot still need to b
ugzappers volunteer triage team
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
>
> 2012/4/11 Kashyap Chamarthy :
>>
>>>
>>> I'm going give it a try w/ btrfs partitioning. Meanwhile, I wasn't keeping
>>> up. Can someone
>>> confirm, does /boot sti
>
> I'm going give it a try w/ btrfs partitioning. Meanwhile, I wasn't keeping
> up. Can someone
> confirm, does /boot still need to be ext3/ext4 for btrfs to work?
>
Ok, I gave it a try w/ the below command line, and an error "you have not
created a
bootloader stage1 target device. This can
On 04/10/2012 06:03 PM, Karel Volný wrote:
>
> hi,
>
>> I know that anaconda is having a bug in terms of installing to
>> btrfs Partitions and btrfs is generally disabled for now.
>> Anybody knows if a installation of F17 to btrfs is possible
>> if it already exists?
>
> I've tried Alpha install
k:
# yum install pki-ca
Just to note that having '389-ds-base' is a pre-requisite for having.
Meanwhile, I'll find
sometime tomm. to give this a shot on latest F-16.
/kashyap
>
> dogtag install via add/remove gui works for the current rel candidate
>
> On 10/31/2011 10:42
On 10/30/2011 06:54 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> Broken dependencies prevent install.
> I was not abled to work around by rpm-ing
> files in Packages.
I'm assuming you're running 'yum install dogtag-pki' Is that it?
What version of Fedora are you running F15? F16?
Can you paste the
On 08/24/2011 02:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks. So, another criteria discussion. It came up during Alpha
> that we're grievously lacking criteria to ensure kickstart installs
> work. So, we should kick that around a bit, I guess...
>
> kickstart is a very broad area; you can write extr
On 04/26/2011 07:35 PM, James Laska wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 16:35 +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So it's been a few days now with F15 beta, with the sleek Gnome3
>> installed.(Machine - DELL
>> Precision T5400). Apart from a few glitches,
Hi,
So it's been a few days now with F15 beta, with the sleek Gnome3
installed.(Machine - DELL
Precision T5400). Apart from a few glitches, this looks good.
Now, I'm aware of the 'Consistent-Network-Device-Naming' feature.
Question:
- In the stock F15 install, I don't see an 'ifcfg-em1
On 08/28/2010 06:05 PM, cornel panceac wrote:
>
>
> 2010/8/28 Kashyap Chamarthy <mailto:kashy...@fedoraproject.org>>
>
>
> -
> # ln -s /lib/systemd/system/multi-user.target
> /etc/systemd/system/default.target)
>
>
Hi,
I still notice fresh F14(Aug27-build) install(a kvm guest) doesn't boot into
runlevel-3
with systemd.
I added these two symlink's from Lennart's email, and rebooted without any
special kernel
parameters
-
# ln -s /lib/systemd/system/multi-user.target
/etc/sy
24 matches
Mail list logo
