Re: Heads up: GNOME 43.0 megaupdate is in testing

On 9/21/22 18:02, Kamil Paral wrote: Hi Kalev, while it's not essential, I find it unfortunate that Night Light controls are now broken, I think many people use it: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/issues/2056

Heads up: GNOME 43.0 megaupdate is in testing

Hi all, Just a quick heads up that the GNOME 43.0 final release megaupdate is now in F37 updates-testing: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0bd68bbb43 This is the GNOME version that's we'll be shipping F37 Final with, so please make sure to test it and file issues for things t

Re: Basic criterion proposal: g-i-s shouldn't take 2 minutes to launch

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:44 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:00 AM Adam Williamson < > adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> On Sun, 2021-03-14 at 11:13 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: >> > In the wake of the BZ 1924808[1] discussion in Thursday's Go/No-Go >> > meeting[2], I am pro

GNOME test day today

Hi all, GNOME 40 test days are starting today, and running all the way through Friday. If you can, come and join :) The GNOME 40.rc mega-update just landed in F34 updates-testing, https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-303f6623fa so if you are already on F34, just make sure to upda

Re: proposal: Default application functionality criterion reduction

On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:44 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 3:20 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > >> This proposal intends to reduce the scope of the “*Default application >> functionality*” release criterion [0]: >> >> All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical >>

Re: GNOME Test day iso

Releng just started a new F32 compose that should get us the image. We'll see in a bit how it goes. Kalev On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:59 PM Alessio wrote: > Hello. > How it is going with the test image iso? > > In addition, on the wiki it is state that: "It's also fine to use a > fully updated

Re: dnf upgrade dnf massacred dnf

On 3/11/19 07:26, Felix Miata wrote: Not enough freespace to download everything in advance and install/upgrade 1100+ packages before deleting everything. So after set-disabled rawhide and rawhide-modular I did my usual attempt to bunch packages via .bash_history: # dnf update dnf* rpm* syste

Re: Fedora 30 0222 drop

On 2/25/19 20:39, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2019-02-25 at 11:28 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Sat, 2019-02-23 at 16:25 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: >>> Testing of F30 Workstation pre-Beta 0222 drop: >>> >>> ISO file could not checked for integrity because the CHECKSUM file was

Re: Out today. but comments for release readiness

On 10/25/2018 01:57 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: I have a family thing that needs my full attention. However: 1. I know I'm normally mashing on the "ship it!" button, but this time around I think we should take caution and make sure we're confident about all of the issues around libdnf and

Heads up: today's rawhide and F29 updates-testing break gnome-shell login

Hi all, It turns out mozjs60 60.2.0 (in F29 updates-testing and rawhide) silently broke ABI and that broke gjs that gnome-shell uses. I've rebuilt gjs; if you've already updated and can't log in, then gjs-1.54.0-3.fc29 and gjs-1.54.0-3.fc30 should help. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FE

Re: GNOME: log in not possible/crash after update/upgrade

On 05/03/2018 01:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 22:01 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: today, I've updated my fedora (from 2018-04-17, with updates-testing). After reboot, I wasn't able to log in (session just crashed right after typing my password). The bug is already reported

Re: Cairo 1.15.12-1.fc29 has a serious regression

On 04/15/2018 03:21 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Cairo 1.15.12-1.fc29 has broken bino and gmplayer at least and likely > other things. 1.15.10-5.fc29 still works fine. > Bug 1567611: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567611 I can't seem to reproduce this with the cairo 1.15.12 build tha

Re: gthumb: ... Unable to initialize the Clutter backend: no available drivers found

On 04/10/2018 01:39 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > i'm currently digging around on google and in bugzilla, seeing if > someone else has reported and resolved this. thoughts? This is likely fixed with this mesa update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-10fbc1fcf6 (on its way to u

Re: The new gnome-software update with "third party repositories" support

On 03/19/2018 09:29 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Would it also be possible to use a different term than "Third > party repositories" in the software repositories dialogue? What's > happening now is that the repositories from the > fedora-workstation-repositories package come under "Third party > reposi

Re: The new gnome-software update with "third party repositories" support

Hi, Thanks for starting the discussion, Ankur! I was just about to send a request for testing to the test list. I just pushed gnome-software 3.28.0 to F27 updates-testing that implements Fedora Workstation Third Party Repositories as approved in https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/121

Re: Help test GNOME 3.28.0 megaupdate

On 03/16/2018 11:39 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 13:51 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: >> Fair enough, that's probably a prudent thing to do. I've split it out >> from the rest of the 3.28.0 update now: >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/up

Re: Help test GNOME 3.28.0 megaupdate

On 03/17/2018 03:23 PM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > Kalev, > > I loaded the ISO you provided onto a bare metal system (Lenovo > ThinkCenter M58P with E8400 processor) via DVD. I use US English. I > tried most of the settings in the Settings Panel (some don't apply to > this system like no bluet

Re: Help test GNOME 3.28.0 megaupdate

On 03/16/2018 01:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 11:52 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: >> >> I'd appreciate a lot if people could give it a quick spin and see if >> they can find anything that looks like a regression compared to the >> stable F28

Re: Help test GNOME 3.28.0 megaupdate

On 03/16/2018 12:35 PM, Felipe Borges wrote: > I have tried to boot up the image above but it fails for me. After > grub it spams intermittently the terminal with > > [dracut-initqueue[582]: Warning: dractur-initqueue timeout - starting > timeout scripts > > And after some time it falls back into

Re: Help test GNOME 3.28.0 megaupdate

On 03/16/2018 12:13 PM, Charles-Antoine Couret wrote: > I have an issue with Gnome-Shell which is crashing every time before > displaying applications. I have to downgrade to a beta release to be > able to use it. > > I reported a bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551749 > > Apa

Help test GNOME 3.28.0 megaupdate

Hi test list, I'm hoping we could have GNOME 3.28.0 in F28 Beta as a Freeze Exception. I've filed a bug tracking this, and I hope we can discuss this further during the blocker review meeting on Monday. Bodhi update for 3.28.0: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5ebe0eb1f2 FE bu

Re: Testcase upgrade gnome-software current workstation

On 03/03/2018 11:42 AM, Alessio Ciregia wrote: > 2018-03-03 11:08 GMT+01:00 Kalev Lember : >> There's probably something that has broken dependencies. Can you try >> doing 'dnf distro-sync --releasever=28 --best' (and press 'no' when it >> ask

Re: Testcase upgrade gnome-software current workstation

On 03/03/2018 09:18 AM, Alessio Ciregia wrote: > Hello. > I was following the test case "upgrade gnome-software current > workstation" [1] upgrading F27 to F28 using GNOME Software. > I got the warn as in the screenshot [2] stating that fwupdate related > software is incompatible with Fedora 28. Is

Re: Fedora 27 Final blocker status mail #1

On 10/20/2017 02:52 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > 4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494061 > ACTION: desktop team to investigate and fix Should be now fixed with https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c7e6d7da2b ___ test mailing

Re: Fedora Rawhide cannot boot up after upgrade to 20170117 snapshot

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Bowen Wang wrote: > Hi everyone, > After I upgraded to the 20170117 snapshot, I cannot boot up fedora > rawhide. I can see the loading screen with the fedora logo, but after > that, the screen just switch to the text mode, the last line in the text > mode is: > St

Re: gnome-software no notifications, but pending updates

On 12/23/2016 11:52 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > In gnome-shell if I go to restart (upper right corner, power button > icon) I have an 'install pending software updates' now for two days, > but there's no other notification that there are pending software > updates. > > Is this change in behavior exp

Re: F24 Beta status

On 04/27/2016 08:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Hey folks! Just to keep everyone in the loop, here's what's going on with F24 Beta: we have two outstanding accepted blockers that need fixing before we can spin a 'release candidate': http

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20151216 compose check report

On 12/16/2015 11:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: only it was too late - by the time he posted that, the new gsettings- desktop-schemas was already in the repos. So all the Workstation upgrade tests fail; the upgrade process itself works fine, but GDM does not start properly in the upgraded system.

Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

On 11/20/2015 03:56 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/20/2015 07:16 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: The biggest issue is this, I think. We probably need to encode "Special Blockers" into the Go/No-Go process. I don't think that assurance that it will be fix

Re: Fedora 23 Branched 20150905 compose check report

On 09/05/2015 10:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2015-09-05 at 11:54 -0400, Fedora compose checker wrote: >> Missing expected images: >> >> Kde Live i386 >> Workstation Live i386 >> Cloud base Disk i386 >> Minimal Disk armhfp >> Cloud base Disk x86_64 >> Kde Live x86_64 >> Kde Disk armhfp >

Re: oversized icons in nautilus

On 05/24/2015 05:32 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 05/24/2015 04:44 PM, Ronal B Morse wrote: >> On 05/24/2015 12:05 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>> [1] In xfce, try Settings->Xfce Theme Manager->Icons >> Ralf, in the Nautilus window running on Gnome, click on the middle >> button on the right side

How To Do Testing (was: Re: test Digest, Vol 134, Issue 49)

1) Install pre-release F22, for example http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_RC1/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-22_Beta-1.iso 2) Register an account on https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts 3) Run 'dnf update' daily 4) Run 'fedora-easy-karma' daily, and giv

Re: big problems after this morning f22 gnome mega update

On 03/27/2015 01:14 PM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Downgrading libinput to libinput-0.12.0-2.fc22.x86_64 solves my problem. > Many thanks. Great, thanks for testing. Can you file a bugzilla ticket against libinput and leave karma at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4500/libinput-0.

Re: big problems after this morning f22 gnome mega update

On 03/27/2015 06:05 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi guys, > > after installing this morning F22 updates (essentially gnome updates to > V3.16.0-1) I have big problems with the gnome3 desktop: > > 1. The mouse speed is veryy slow; changing the mouse speed by the > gnome-control-center has no ef

Re: gnome-settings-daemon conflicts with gnome-shell-3.13.91-1.fc22.x86_64

On 09/17/2014 11:52 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > And once again, F20 doesn't upgrade to Rawhide: > > # yum update > [...] > --> Processing Conflict: gnome-settings-daemon-3.13.92-1.fc22.x86_64 > conflicts gnome-shell < 3.13.92 > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: gnome-settings-daemon c

Re: What's wrong with Fedora 21 GNOME?

On 08/26/2014 10:20 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 08/26/2014 09:57 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> Where is the menu of Evince? Its Help system refers to it ("top right >> corner"), but I can't find it. > > I filed this earlier today at > https://bugzilla.gnom

Re: after update, suddenly gnome-screenshot won't start

On 09/05/2014 05:57 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:04 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: >> Can you file this downstream in bugzilla.redhat.com too? We should be >> able to propose this as an Alpha freeze exception and pull it in so >> that >> it gets

Re: after update, suddenly gnome-screenshot won't start

On 08/29/2014 02:36 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 19:19 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >> The desktop file is correct; it launches gnome-screenshot >> --interactive. >> So the program itself is indeed broken. > > This bug also exists in F21. I filed a bug a couple of days ago: >

Re: What's wrong with Fedora 21 GNOME?

On 08/26/2014 09:57 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Where is the menu of Evince? Its Help system refers to it ("top right > corner"), but I can't find it. I filed this earlier today at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735446 -- Kalev -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Thursday's rawhide and mutter

On 05/01/2014 03:13 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > In today's rawhide there is a file conflict between mutter and > mutter-wayland. There is already a new build of mutter which obsoletes > mutter-wayland. So you can either grab the latest mutter or manaully > remove mutter-wayland, if you want today'

Re: No display after update

2013-06-12 15:07, Kalev Lember skrev: > 2013-06-12 13:18, Lawrence Graves skrev: >> I installed Fedora 19 TC2 and after update it failed to display . > > Likely https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973542 ... and now with a fix: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnom

Re: No display after update

2013-06-12 13:18, Lawrence Graves skrev: > I installed Fedora 19 TC2 and after update it failed to display . Likely https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973542 -- Kalev -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Please help test packages!

2013-05-26 21:37, John Reiser skrev: > What should I expect? I get no error, but no much more: > > $ fedora-easy-karma > Getting list of installed packages... > Getting list of packages in updates-testing... > $ echo $? > 0 > $ > This probably means that you don't have the updates-t

Please help test packages!

Hi, We are now out of the Beta freeze and this means time to test! With the freeze lifted, people are going to be rushing to get last minute fixes in, during the short window before the Final freeze. F19 already has a large number of unapproved updates queued in updates-testing. Could folks that

Re: Vmware Workstation 9

2013-05-18 02:22, Lawrence Graves skrev: > Able to install Workstation 9 but can't get a visual. Any ideas what's > going on. Welcome all imput. Likely the the same issue that's reported here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700495 Can you try if 'yum downgrade gtkmm24' fixes it for yo

Karma requests -- oversize desktop live media

Hi, I have collected here a few builds that should help cut down the live media sizes. It would be great to have them in stable before the Beta freeze tomorrow. Could someone help me test them, please? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7885/file-roller-3.8.1-4.fc19 https://admi

Re: Frequent evolution crashes anyone?

On 01/07/2013 10:50 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 09:32:05 +, Peter Robinson wrote: >> downgrading from gtk3 3.6.3 to 3.6.2 seems to have fixed this for me. >> >> "yum downgrade gtk3*" > > Above bug also crashes evince occasionally: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/892209 See

Re: Uh-oh something has gone wrong....

On 12/19/2012 08:31 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > After installing updates from rawhide 20121219 had to revert clutter, > clutter-gtk and mutter to get desktop back. Don't know what is causing > this or who to bz. If anyone knows, tell me and I will bz. Hi Clyde, I think I've fixed this up. Ther

Please help test packages! (was: Fedora 18 updates-testing report)

Hi, F18 currently has a huge number of unapproved updates queued in updates-testing. Could folks that are on F18 please run fedora-easy-karma occasionally and file karma as appropriate? And please don't only file negative karma, positive karma is also very much needed in case you don't notice any

Re: today's yum dependency issues for rawhide

On 07/11/2012 06:12 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > --> Processing Dependency: libudev.so.0()(64bit) for package: > vlc-core-2.0.1-1.fc18.x86_64 I believe this is holding back most of your updates. Is vlc-core a rpmfusion package? It should be rebuilt for libudev ABI change. File a bug with rpmfusion

Re: FC17 upto FC18/ Rawhide???

On 06/12/2012 08:24 PM, Rob Healey wrote: > I sit and wait and wait and wait some more, all that I ever get is a > mouse pointer with a waiting symbol. I never get anywhere farther than > the mouse cursor which does move all around the screen if I play with it Try booting into the single user

Re: gtk3-3.5.2-1 ???

On 06/08/2012 12:44 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Well, what do you mean by 'use it', exactly? F17 has GTK+ 3.4. 3.5 is a > new major version - it's not API/ABI compatible. If you were going to > backport it to F17 you'd have to either install it alongside 3.4 - in > which case you would not, in pra

mass closing F15 bugs in bugzilla?

Hello, What's the plan for handling the upcoming F15 end-of-life in Bugzilla? In the past, as per the bugzilla housekeeping page [1], the bugs for EOL releases have been mass closed and the rawhide bugs have gotten rebased for the new current release. Are there any plans to do that for F15 as well

Re: Lots of schema related warnings on yum update

On 04/25/2012 12:50 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > I get these schema warnings on updating my F17 system: >> warning: Schema 'org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Logger' has path >> '/apps/telepathy-logger/'. Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or >> '/system/' are deprecated. [...] > How shou

Re: /usr/bin/sync hangs up if called in

On 04/15/2012 01:50 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 04/15/2012 10:18 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: >> Calling /usr/bin/sync manually will hang up. System continues to operate >> and reboots normally. >> >> This happens with kernel-3.3.1-5.fc17, kernel-3.3.2-1.fc17 and &

Re: /usr/bin/sync hangs up if called in

On 04/15/2012 10:18 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Calling /usr/bin/sync manually will hang up. System continues to operate > and reboots normally. > > This happens with kernel-3.3.1-5.fc17, kernel-3.3.2-1.fc17 and > glibc-2.15-32.fc17.x86_64. > > Anybody sees this too? I just ran into the same thi

Re: Proposal: stop holding composes for preupgrade bugs at Alpha and Beta phases

On 04/10/2012 09:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 22:15 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> I think we want preupgrade to work for at least beta. I think just not >> blocking the composes, but requiring it to work for beta is better than >> waiting until final. > > That's the int

Re: Weird F17 effect: New gdm-3.4.0.1 presents mysql server account on the login screen

On 03/31/2012 12:04 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Ray Strode wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> on gdm? why not filtering out by defaul the famous non-human users, >>> like >>> mysql and postgresql? >> We could do that, but it's not a very scalable or upstream friendly answer >> (since

Re: Dependency problems

On 10/24/2011 01:49 AM, Richard Marko wrote: > ** Found 2 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: > gnome-python2-gtkhtml2-2.25.3-34.fc15.x86_64 has missing requires of > gnome-python2-extras = ('0', '2.25.3', '34.fc15') This one should be fixed with the gnome-python2-extras bui

Re: [Test-Announce] Note for people with EFI installs: install grub-efi!

On 10/12/2011 06:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:29 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote: >> I can think of two ways to convince yum to always install grub-efi on >> upgrades: >> a) have grub2 require grub-efi; or >> b) have grub-efi obsolete grub.

Re: [Test-Announce] Note for people with EFI installs: install grub-efi!

On 10/12/2011 04:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed > stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new grub-efi > subpackage. If you have an EFI install of F16 you will need to have > grub-efi installed or else your system wo

Re: Cannot lock screen with gnome-screensaver-3.1.91-1.fc16 from bodhi

On 09/08/2011 01:12 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Not yet because fetching many packages from koji before they are listed > as pushed in the corresponding bodhi tickets is beyond my time. By the way, there's a very simple yet not widely known bodhi feature for downloading the whole update set. I o

Re: [Test-Announce] 2011-09-05 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting (?)

On 09/05/2011 05:53 PM, Kamil Paral wrote: > No responses, so let's do an email check-in today. I have hopefully fixed the bug that rendered freshly installed Alpha systems unbootable after upgrading grub2. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/grub2-1.99-5.fc16 -- Kalev -- test mailing lis

Re: Firefox crash

On 08/28/2011 11:30 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > $ rpm -q firefox xulrunner > firefox-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64 > xulrunner-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64 > > crashes for me (and opens its own crash handler dialog) when trying > to browse pages at http://bikemap.net > > This is _without_ Adobe's Flash plugin in cas

Re: persistent gnome dep problems (F16 alpha rc3-5, alpha), --skip-broken wants to haul in 32-bit libs

On 08/25/2011 08:12 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > I've worked my way through this kind of mess a couple of times now, most > recently yesterday. Here's my experience: > > - Do a big rawhide update - in this case, at least two weeks worth. A bit off topic, but I would personally encourage everybo

Re: SOLVED Re: Mock for more than one config\arch?

On 07/12/2010 12:50 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 12/07/10 10:01, Kalev Lember wrote: >> for ARCH in fedora-12-i386 fedora-12-x86_64 fedora-rawhide-i386 ; do >>mock -r $ARCH mypackage.src.rpm >> done >> > > Is it basically bash script? > I'm not ex

Re: Mock for more than one config\arch?

On 07/12/2010 11:39 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > I'm doing something wrong but what is the correct sequence to build for > more that one arch, mock --help\man not throwing much light for me. > > mock -r fedora12.i386 fedora12.x86_64 fedora 13.xx fedoraDevel.xx > --rebuild --resultdir=/some/local/path