Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

+1 On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 6:53 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Yup +1 from my side too. Xen is hardly tested since a lot of time. > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:07 PM Geoffrey Marr wrote: > >> Since F24, I haven't seen or heard of anyone who uses Xen over KVM >> anywhere other than this thread.

Re: Let's stop using wiki for test results

Hi Rolf! I was not around teh internetz over the weekend, but I took the liberty of creating the page for your testday just now. I also put the the results already tracked in the wiki into the app, and added a reference to the tool to the wiki testday. Regards, Joza - Original Message

Re: Let's stop using wiki for test results

- Original Message - > From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" > To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 3:42:13 PM > Subject: Re: Let's stop using wiki for test results > > Hmm when was it decided that we should write our own app to replace the > wiki instead of trying to

Re: Let's stop using wiki for test results

to work with them on using the app. BTW: I'm open to name suggestions, now it's just "the Testday App" :D and it lives here: http://testdays.qa.fedoraproject.org/testdays/ Regards, Joza - Original Message - > From: "Cole Robinson" > To: "For te

Re: Validation tests not yet run against Final

Just a note: we also have a script which can go through wiki matrices to make statistics, so it might be useful (at least) as a source of inspiration. https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/stats/testcase_stats Run: $ python testcase_stats.py 19 "Final TC3 Install" to get stats

Re: Fedora 18 issues with translations and keymaps

via common bugs. Joza - Original Message - > From: "drago01" > To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" > > Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 4:15:29 PM > Subject: Re: Fedora 18 issues with translations and keymaps > > On Th

Re: Fedora 18 issues with translations and keymaps

I'm absolutely +1 with jeischmann and jreznik on this matter. Keyboard layouts are broken almost every other (if not every one) Fedora release. The same exact encrypt-prompt issue was (at least) in F16, and we released it anyway. I'm not saying that we should just blindly say "it's late, let's s

Re: Partitioning related testcases (F18 Installation Matrix template changes)

OK, I've replaced the testcases, incorporating your suggestions. At the end, I decided to go with the 'old style' encrypted install (basic autopart with enabled encryption). The testcases now are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/

Partitioning related testcases (F18 Installation Matrix template changes)

Hi, I'd like to replace the following test cases: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_(encrypted)_install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_(use_all_space)_install https://fedo

Re: How to interpret F18 Blocker criterion

I'm most certainly for _keeping_ the criterion, and I'm not necessarily against expanding it also to MacOS, but that's about it (IMHO). J. - Original Message - > From: "Adam Williamson" > To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" > > Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Re: F18 Criterions/Testcases interconnection

- Original Message - > From: "Kamil Paral" > No, this is a game of "spot five differences" :-) At least one versus > all virtual consoles. This can be part of the same test case, marked > as Alpha/Beta OK, I'll update the summary page/matrix accordingly. Also I'll try to highlight this

Re: F18 Criterions/Testcases interconnection

> Well I see your point, but it kind of cuts both ways - Josef clearly > got > confused by a few cases where we overload test cases to test several > different things, so you can argue that it's actually more > 'accessible' > when we try to stick to 'one test case tests one thing'. But your > appro

Re: Installation Matrix Template - new Anaconda related changes

> The list I'd come up with so far looks like this: > > 1. autopart empty disk > 2. autopart existing empty space > 3. autopart wipe entire disk > 4. autopart alongside existing > 5. autopart shrink > 6. autopart multidisk > > so for 1) you feed it an entirely empty disk and let it autopart into

Installation Matrix Template - new Anaconda related changes

= Obsoleted Testcases = * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Package_Sets_Package_Groups_Check = Questions/Discussion = == QA:Testcase Anaconda autopart (use all space) install == The current word

Re: F18 Criterions/Testcases interconnection

Beta is done , some issues I've come around: -- 5. The installer must be able to use the HTTP, FTP and either NFS or NFSISO remote package source options - The testcase

F18 Criterions/Testcases interconnection

Hi, I started to connect criterions to testcases for the F18 testing. So far, the Alpha is done (the messy page with criterions & links to testcases can be found here ), and it looks all right. Some problems I'v

F18 Install test matrix - moved 'upgrade' testcases

Hi, since all the upgrade testcases are basically 'obsolete', as we are still waiting for FedUP, and Anaconda does not have any means of upgrading installed system, I created a new sub-category of 'Currently Unsupported Testcases' in the General Tests subsection of https://fedoraproject.org/wi

Re: New testcase proposal: Dualboot with Windows

Hello gang, as there were no opposing voices, I'll add the test to the test matrix template. Once again, kudos to adamw for providing the base test. Joza - Original Message - > From: "Josef Skladanka" > To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora re

Re: New testcases proposal - Installation from USB-written images (0/5)

Hi, as there were no objections, I added the testcases from this 'series' of emails to the Install Test Matrix Template [1] Regards Josef [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_17_Install_Results_Template#USB_Stick - Original Message - > From: "Josef Skla

New testcase proposal: Dualboot with Windows

Hello, I'd like to propose new Testcase, to cover the Final criterion: "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an existing clean single-partition Windows installation and either install a bootloader which can boot into the Windows installation, or leave the Windows boot

Re: Installation from USB-written images (5/5): DVD.iso + Livecd-iso-to-disk

50 AM > Subject: Re: Installation from USB-written images (5/5): DVD.iso + > Livecd-iso-to-disk > > On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 08:17 -0500, Josef Skladanka wrote: > > This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses USB stick > > and transfers the DVD.iso to it usin

Re: Installation from USB-written images (1/5): Live.iso + dd

Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:23:46 AM > Subject: Re: Installation from USB-written images (1/5): Live.iso + dd > > On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 07:58 -0500, Josef Skladanka wrote: > > This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses dd to > > transfer the Fedora Live.iso to USB

Installation from USB-written images (5/5): DVD.iso + Livecd-iso-to-disk

This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses USB stick and transfers the DVD.iso to it using Livecd-iso-to-disk, the installation can be successfully finished. Installer should be able to use the DVD local package source options, but this is caused by the way LITD writes the image to t

Installation from USB-written images (4/5): DVD.iso + dd

This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses USB stick and transfers the DVD.iso to it using dd, the installation can be successfully finished. Even though this technically is DVD.iso, we do not require anaconda to successfully use the DVD local package source options (F17 Alpha Release

Installation from USB-written images (3/5): Live.iso + LiveCD-tools

This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses LiveCD tools to transfer the Fedora Live.iso to USB stick, the boot process works 'as expected'. I propose this as a Alpha verification testcase. --- = Description = This test verifies that Fedora Live Image can be

Installation from USB-written images (1/5): Live.iso + Livecd-iso-to-disk

This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses Livecd-iso-to-disk to transfer the Fedora Live.iso to USB stick, the boot process works 'as expected'. I propose this as a Alpha verification testcase. --- = Description = This test verifies that Fedora Live Image c

Installation from USB-written images (1/5): Live.iso + dd

This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses dd to transfer the Fedora Live.iso to USB stick, the boot process works 'as expected'. I propose this as a Alpha verification testcase. --- = Description = This test verifies that Fedora Live Image can be booted fro

New testcases proposal - Installation from USB-written images (0/5)

Hello, as per [1] and [2], I'd like to propose five new testcases, which focus on testing the ability to boot/install Fedora using USB stick as the installation/boot medium. Even though, there is no Release Criterion specifying the supported installation media, the [2] mentions 'Common Boot med

2010-06-21 @ ** 15:00 UTC ** - Fedora QA meeting minutes

== #fedora-meeting: Fedora QA Meeting == Meeting started by jlaska at 14:59:57 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-06-21/fedora-qa.2010-06-21-14.59.log.html . Meeting summary --