On 02/25/2013 11:13 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:02:33 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
- it means that the report data doesn't contain 'installed_package' field
- Updating to the latest abrt should help:
abrt-2.1.1
libreport-2.1.1
btparser-0
On 02/23/2013 12:04 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
So, recently ABRT has started intercepting a few crashes but refusing to
let me report them:
/usr/bin/nm-applet Process /usr/bin/nm-applet was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
| Processing failed.
|
| --- Running report_uReport ---
| Server side erro
On 05/23/2012 06:06 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
During F17 RC testing, twice now [1][2] I've been unable to submit
bugs using abrt because the backtrace was considered "unusable" by
abrt.
1. Is there a problem with the debuginfo's or abrt functionality
during this F17 final RC stage?
2. What happ
Hi,
the new retrace server HW is finally set up and running. Since it has
the same name as the old one (retrace.fedoraproject.org) no special
configuration is needed, it *should* just work.
pros:
- support for F16 (so we can use it on liveCD (need to fix: 742609))
- support for rawhide (testers
Forgot to add a fedora-test-list to CC. Please join if you have time.
Thank you,
Jirka
Original Message
Hi all!
Just a reminder that on Monday is the ABRT & libreport testday.
The testday is focused mainly on libreport integration - unified problem
reporting mechanism [1]. Th
On 05/20/2011 04:48 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Fri May 20 10:28:21 UTC 2011 Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>> It was probably running under different user then who is running the
>> abrt-gui so gui can't access it and doesn't show it. You can try to run
>> the gui as roo
On 05/14/2011 05:28 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> May 14 11:23:24 nbecker1 abrt[17229]: saved core dump of pid 17226
> (/usr/libexec/colord) to
> /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2011-05-14-11:23:24-17226.new/coredump (18477056 bytes)
>
> But run abrt-gui doesn't show anything.
>
> So 2 problems, colord dumping and
On 05/16/2011 01:07 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>
>> On 05/15/2011 09:05 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>>> Here's another one.
>>>
>>> May 15 14:32:40 nbecker1 kernel: [13788.265548] at-spi-registry[3807]:
>>> segfault at
On 05/15/2011 09:05 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Here's another one.
>
> May 15 14:32:40 nbecker1 kernel: [13788.265548] at-spi-registry[3807]:
> segfault
> at 18 ip 003ad50259a1 sp 7fff8ed82dc0 error 4 in
> libgconf-2.so.4.1.5[3ad500+3b000]
> May 15 14:32:40 nbecker1 abrt[3808]: saved cor
On 05/15/2011 01:06 PM, Frederic Muller wrote:
> On 05/15/2011 07:01 PM, Frederic Muller wrote:
>> On 05/15/2011 06:47 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>>> On 05/15/2011 12:18 PM, Frederic Muller wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> I just did a rm -Rf * on
On 05/15/2011 12:18 PM, Frederic Muller wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just did a rm -Rf * on /var/cache/abrt-di/ as it was 3.2GiB and growing.
>
> After checking the 927 bugs related to abrt I could only find this one
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529573 which matches my
> issue but relates to
On 04/01/2011 03:33 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
> Nautilus crashed and abrt popped up.
>
> First, I selected the option to do send the report to the remote analyzer.
>
> That hung with
>
> Certificate is signed by an untrusted issuer:
> 'E=mto...@redhat.com,CN=retrace01.fedoraproject.org,OU=BaseOS,O=Re
>
> I just tested this again and it still doesn't appear to be working. Task
> ID was 395668768 and password ZE8NvUgmhlUKXI1KQWY4gxePcoq4b341 if you
> want to check it out yourself. The log ends with:
>
>
file:///var/cache/abrt-retrace/fedora-15-x86_64-updates/repodata/repomd.xml:
[Errno 14
On 02/24/2011 10:08 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>
>> The new ABRT version will have option to use the retrace server instead of
>> the local retracing. The new version should be out in a few days (at least
>> in
On 02/23/2011 10:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 12:46 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 19:50 +, mike cloaked wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Adam Williamson
>>> wrote:
>>>
What we really want is to use the retrace server:
On 02/23/2011 08:50 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> What we really want is to use the retrace server:
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RetraceServer
>>
>> I should test using that and document it.
>
> Maybe I am a bit dim but I can
On 02/23/2011 08:38 PM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> Just curious, but has anyone considered something like Microsoft's
> symbol server system, which can download symbols for specific executable
> files from one or more central repositories?
>
> They have public servers which can be used to download s
17 matches
Mail list logo
