-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/07/2010 09:55 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> Hi,
> I just made a fresh install of Fedora 14 and it seems that KMS+gnome is a
> bit of a cpu hog. I can boot into runlevel 3 and the load will move towards
> 0 but when I move to runlevel 5 and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/23/2010 09:16 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> I have been seeing this in rawhide for a while now when I get a selinux
> denial and click show. Can't find where to bz it. No module sealert
> listed. No selinux nec that I can see.
>
> Opps, seale
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/22/2010 05:29 AM, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> Using top I found it is Xorg - taking up nearly 100% of CPU time . .
>
> Is there some way to find out what it is about Xorg in particular?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phil.
By any chance are you using the radeon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/01/2010 02:40 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Up-to-date Fedora 14 Beta (Oct 1st):
>
> "init 1" (or also "init 3") run from within a GNOME session here
> doesn't terminate X.
>
> Is it just my installation or reproducible?
>
> $ rpm -qf /sbin/in
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Jeff Raber wrote:
>>
>> Bug 622149 looks suspciously like a duplicate of
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610967 but it is not
>> marked as such. There is also
>
> I just closed bugs 610967 & 626026 as dups of 6221
>
> Bug 622149 looks suspciously like a duplicate of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610967 but it is not
> marked as such. There is also
I just closed bugs 610967 & 626026 as dups of 622149 which is
blocking F14Target[1].
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626026
> whic
shooting this type of issue here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_kernel_problems#Diagnosing_.22My_machine_locked_up.22
Regards.
Jeff Raber
IRC: jra...@freenode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://e
On 07/22/2010 12:07 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
> As announced last week on the development list, all Fedora bugs with a
> version of "rawhide" (with some exceptions) will be rebased to version
> "14" on the Fedora 14 branching date (currently scheduled for 2010-07-27).
> http://lists.fedoraproject.
On 06/18/2010 01:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I want to keep to the 'Test Day' because the concurrency aspect - having
> everyone in IRC, including a developer to give a very fast feedback/fix
> loop - is one of the key features, and you can't maintain that over a
> period longer than a day.
>
>