- Original Message -
> On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 22:29 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > Great to see this come together, thanks for the cc. The page looks
> > great. It does a good job of describing what a TC and RC are, and
> > the
> > "whys" for requ
- Original Message -
> Hey, folks.
>
> So I've been doing the TC / RC requests for a while, and James did
> them
> before that. It occurred to me that while it's theoretically
> 'obvious'
> how this happens, and mostly defined by the release validation
> process,
> in practice it's probabl
On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 04:55 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > 2. Ask Anaconda team to provide us with their "official" and
> > > supported solution.
> > >
> > > After inspecting updates.img, there is a lot of code copied from
> > > (some old version of) anaconda. That doesn't seem to me as a good
>
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 07:49:28AM -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 12:19 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > I've been mirroring 16 trees locally for a while now, and don't
> > > recall there being a single day yet that there has been an images/
> > >
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 17:25 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 4:01 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > The best
> > option at this time might be to install Fedora 15, while adding the
> > Fedora 16 branched repos during install.
>
> I've just done th
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 11:44 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2011/08/09 10:01 (GMT-0400) James Laska composed:
>
> > I checked in with the kind folks in #anaconda ... for fresh Fedora 16
> > installations, only grub2 will be used.
>
> Then there needs to be an option
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 09:08 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:59 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> >> Can grub be passed to the installer to prevent grub2 being used as the
> >> bootloader?
> >
> > no. but you could do package
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-08-05/f16-blocker-review.2011-08-05-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-08-05/f16-blocker-review.2011-08-05-17.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-08-05
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 22:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/04/2011 08:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Don't quite see what you mean. We're behind because the TC1 images
> > were delayed by a week, that's pretty much it. The shape they're in
> > when they arrive is a function of the develope
# F16 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #4
# Date: 2011-08-05
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Mark your calendars ... the fourth Alpha blocker review meeting starts
at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers this Friday. We'll review p
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 11:23 +0530, Srinivasa Narayanappa wrote:
> Hello All,
Hi Srinivasa,
Thanks for participating in testing TC1!
> I have tried to install the FC16 Alpha TC1 on VMWare virtual machine,
> after selecting the hard disk for the portioning getting the error
> message as "no usable
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 21:21 -0500, John Watzke wrote:
> Honestly I rather having the extra TC build to weed out any potential
> blocker that could arise during fixing and spinning of the known blockers.
> I've seen that happen in the past and an extra spin can help make sure RC is
> better at the s
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 18:16 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Test Compose 1
> (TC1) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
> download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
> images arrive a few hours afte
==
#fedora-meeting: fedora-qa-meeting
==
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-08-01/fedora-qa-meeting.2011-08-01-15.10.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-08-01/fedora-qa-
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2011-08-01
# Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting tomorrow. I drafted an initial
agenda based on the pr
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-29/f16-alpha-blocker-review.2011-07-29-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-29/f16-alpha-blocker-review.2011-07-29-17.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 07:55 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:16:17 -0400
> James Laska wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the heads up Andre. Is dl.fp.org a distinct server,
> > different than alt. and serverbeach1.? Or is it some mirrormanager
> > magic that
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 14:52 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'm currently surveying the QA release calendar:
>
> http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-16/f-16-quality-tasks.html
>
> to check we have SOPs for all tasks on it. As part of that, a couple of
> tasks have emerged that we don't r
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 00:31 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> After discussing with smooge and nirik on #fedora-admin, decided to change the
> 16 Alpha TC1 test matrix pages to use dl.fp.o instead of serverbeach1.fp.o and
> alt.fp.o for download links. If no problems are seen, the template pages can
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 17:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 14:35 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > The asymmetry there was intentional and I sort of like it; I think it's
> > > a bigger problem if we install to your type of storage then shut it
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 23:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 07:56 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > We also need a test case for this, of course.
> >
> > Good point. Unless anyone else wants a shot at it, I'll draft something
> > up s
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 10:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 07:56 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > s,systems',system's,g
> >
> > Doh, thanks :)
> >
> > > I think we don't really need reboot to work; shut down and th
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 16:17 +0300, Frederick William New wrote:
> Perhaps the same text could be copied into all test cases in Kickstart
> Delivery - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Kickstart_Delivery
I've made the proposed change to all kickstart tests linked in the above
category.
Thanks
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 18:45 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:30 +0300, Frederick William New wrote:
> > > Comment:
> > >
> > > Replying to [comment:1 rhe]:
> > > > Agree. add a expected result in each kickstart test like：
> > > >
> > > > *
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Q
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 19:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I made a small change to the blocker meeting SOP -
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting#Review_Proposed_Blocker_Bugs
> - just to make it explicit that it's okay to delay the decision on a bug if
> needed informatio
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 21:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:08 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > The installer must be able to complete an installation using the
> > entire disk, existing free space, or existing Linux partitions
> >
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 14:24 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Unfortunately, I have a conflict with the scheduled meeting time
> tomorrow. Is someone else available to #chair the meeting?
Just a reminder, I have a conflict with the scheduled meeting time
today. I haven't heard if anyone i
Greetings gang,
I noticed that the nightly live image build failed [1]. I spoke with
mclasen on IRC and it seems to be a result of a recent
evolution-data-server build. Mbarnes is investigating, stay tuned.
Error creating Live CD : Failed to build transaction :
gnome-panel-3.0.2-2.fc16.x86_64 r
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 21:58 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> On 07/24/2011 07:24 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> > # Date: 2011-07-25
> > # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> > # Location: #fedora-
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2011-07-25
# Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting tomorrow. Please add any topic
suggestions to meeting
Greetings,
During the second Alpha blocker review meeting [1], I took an action
item to propose several adjustments to the release criteria.
Because of bug#723144, it was agreed that the existing installer
partitioning-related Alpha criteria could be adjusted slightly to
accommodate the new "[ ]
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f16-blocker-review.2011-07-22-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f16-blocker-review.2011-07-22-17.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-22/f1
Greetings all,
As a follow-up to my discussion on documenting release criteria for
secondary architectures [1], I've come up with a draft which implements
approach#4 - wiki templates. The approach doesn't seem horrible to me,
but I tend to spend a fair amount of time fiddling with wiki anyway.
# F16 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2011-07-22
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
!!! ALL-CAPS RED-ALERT OMG LOL !!!
Fedora 16 Alpha test compose is less than *one* week away (Jul 26) and
F16 Alpha isn't far behind
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 10:17 -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> On 07/20/2011 08:50 AM, Sergio Rubio wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Hongqing Yang wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi, Sergio,
> >
> > Hi Hongqing,
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks for sharing. Now I and Tao Wu are working on the project Fedora
>
- Original Message -
> On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 06:05 -0400, Tao Wu wrote:
> > Greetings folks,
> >
> > Just wanted to summarize how testing held up for the rawhide
> > acceptance test run of Fedora 16. Thanks for your attention. It is
> > unfortunately that the rawhide installation version ha
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 17:49 +0200, Sergio Rubio wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Posted this to the wrong mailing list (David Cantrell suggested using
> this one instead).
>
> Linking to avoid re-typing :), my apologies:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2011-July/msg00090.html
>
>
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 06:05 -0400, Tao Wu wrote:
> Greetings folks,
>
> Just wanted to summarize how testing held up for the rawhide acceptance test
> run of Fedora 16. Thanks for your attention. It is unfortunately that the
> rawhide installation version has not passed the major test, please
As usual, you can find meeting minutes and IRC transcript on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20110718
TOPIC: Previous meeting follow-up
1. j_dulaney will check-in with desktop team for guidance on s-c
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 20:43 -0400, Joey Boggs wrote:
> On 07/13/2011 01:19 PM, Joey Boggs wrote:
> > It seems there are some issues with the current Spins approval
> > process, but to workaround I've been asked to contact each of your
> > lists to get acks for approval to keep the ball rolling.
>
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 00:57 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> On 07/18/2011 12:37 AM, James Laska wrote:
> > # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> > # Date: 2011-07-18
> > # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> > # Location: #fedora-
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 10:03 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings folks,
>
> To better facilitate self-hosting our weekly QA meeting, I documented
> the process I follow to prepare, host and recap the meeting. There are
> some aspects where I diverge from the documented behave.
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2011-07-18
# Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting tomorrow. Please add any topic
suggestions to meeting
#fedora-bugzappers: F16-Alpha Blocker Review
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-15/f16-alpha-blocker.2011-07-15-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraprojec
- Original Message -
> # F16 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #1
> # Date: 2011-07-15
> # Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
> # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Just a reminder that the first Fedora 16 Alpha blocker bug review meeting
starts in under 1 hour
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 11:31 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 11:16 AM, James Laska wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 20:58 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >> On 07/13/2011 08:11 PM, James Laska wrote:
> >>> Quite a bit
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 18:36 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 19:25 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 07/13/2011 07:17 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > > Your ideas are consistent with how we've handled this before, I don't
> >
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 20:58 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 07/13/2011 08:11 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > Quite a bit smaller than the 100+ bugs on the list. Was that decision
> > from a recent FESCO meeting?
>
> It's the one held on 15 June.
>
&g
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 19:25 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 07/13/2011 07:17 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > Your ideas are consistent with how we've handled this before, I don't
> > think I could have articulated nearly as well though:) My
> >
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 11:52 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 13:22 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 14:28:33 -0400,
> > James Laska wrote:
> > > == Suggested Meeting Preparation ==
> >
> > Is there a plan
# F16 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2011-07-15
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Hard to believe, but the "vacation" is over. Fedora 16 Alpha test
compose is a few weeks away (Jul 26) and the Alpha is about a month
Hi Joey!
Thanks for reaching out to Fedora QA.
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 13:19 -0400, Joey Boggs wrote:
> It seems there are some issues with the current Spins approval process,
> but to workaround I've been asked to contact each of your lists to get
> acks for approval to keep the ball rolling.
>
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 13:00 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:48:28 -0400,
> James Laska wrote:
> >
> > Okay, I've added some wording around your suggestion. Also, I fixed the
> > missing #meeting-name command.
>
> I thought of ano
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 13:03 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On mar, 2011-07-12 at 12:48 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 11:29 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:39:45 -0400,
> > > James Laska wrote:
> > > > O
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 11:29 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:39:45 -0400,
> James Laska wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 11:18 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:03:09 -0400,
> > > James Laska wrote:
&g
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 11:18 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:03:09 -0400,
> James Laska wrote:
> >
> > Any feedback is appreciated. If nothing comes up, I'll move this out of
> > my User:Jlaska space, and link to it from [[QA/Me
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 00:05 +0800, Gerard Braad wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 23:16:54 +0800,
> > Gerard Braad wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:03 PM, James Laska wrote:
> >> > To better f
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 08:40 -0400, Petr Schindler wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm Petr Schindler (my nick is pschindl) and I'm new here. I work in
> fedoraQA team on AutoQA project. I'm looking forward to learn
> something new and to get some experiences with opensource development.
Welcome to the team Petr
Greetings folks,
To better facilitate self-hosting our weekly QA meeting, I documented
the process I follow to prepare, host and recap the meeting. There are
some aspects where I diverge from the documented behave. For example, I
simplified the meeting recap process. So long as the #chair make
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20110711
TOPIC: Gnome Shell duplicate application names
===
* Renaming of xfce-terminal application being discussed upstre
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2011-07-11
# Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
Quite a few topics to discuss today. Many of them are quick updates, so
I don't anticipate going longer than our time slot. As a
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 12:49 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Friday, July 08, 2011 10:10:33 AM James Laska wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:15 +, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > > 2. Highlight differences - Draft individual wiki pages for each
> > > >
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 10:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > > > Any ideas
> > > > for naming, etc? Any comments on the test cases written so far? Thanks!
> > >
> > > One thought, the 'base' matrix page looks a bit sparse.
> >
> >
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 08:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 11:03 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > If doable we should try to come up with a solution aimed at/fits
> > > multiple release cycles
> >
> > How do you mean ... something
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:15 +, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > 2. Highlight differences - Draft individual wiki pages for each
> > arch for each milestone (Alpha, Beta, Final). However, instead
> > of duplicating all applicable primary arch content, only
> > highlight th
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 17:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:24 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > 4. Inline exceptions - No new pages created, simply modify the
> > existing criteria pages to indicate which arches criteria apply
> >
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 21:08 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 07/07/2011 08:24 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > Greetings folks,
> >
> > I'm interested in developing a solution to allow Fedora secondary
> > architectures [1] (specifically ppc64 and s
Greetings folks,
I'm interested in developing a solution to allow Fedora secondary
architectures [1] (specifically ppc64 and s390x for now) to leverage our
existing release criteria [2]. This isn't really a tremendously
difficult technical challenge, more of a content organization conundrum.
The
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 14:14 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > > I dunno, that was just the wording I came up with at the time, I
> > > think :) If we can clarify it, that's all to the good.
> >
> > Is it better/same/worse as follows ...
> >
> >
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 16:52 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 13:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 15:39 -0400, James Laska wrote:
There was one additional change made to the wiki that wasn't previously
discussed. I removed the Beta
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 12:53 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks. So, right now, as most of you know, we have two release
> validation 'matrices' - sets of tests we run and document on each
> candidate build of Fedora to check compliance with the release criteria.
>
> A few of us have been w
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20110627
TOPIC: Gnome Shell duplicate application names
==
* On the terminal issue... xfce "terminal" is getting renamed to
"xfce
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2011-06-27
# Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's that time again. I've included a few topics for discussion below.
As always, feel free to respond to this mail with addition
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 13:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 15:39 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > On the deletion of the 'primary architectures' mention from 4: we should
> > > probably replace this with something in the preamble, similar
Thanks for the feedback! Some follow-up below...
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 10:46 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > Greetings testers,
> >
> > I've been playing with some ideas on how to allow secondary
> > archi
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 13:07 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 06/23/2011 10:46 AM, James Laska wrote:
> > Greetings testers,
> >
> > I've been playing with some ideas on how to allow secondary
> > architectures to leverage the primary release criteria. I have som
Greetings testers,
I've been playing with some ideas on how to allow secondary
architectures to leverage the primary release criteria. I have some
ideas/challenges that I'll send to the list for feedback later.
However, in preparation for those ideas/concerns, I'd like to propose
several changes
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 14:54 +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
> ha! - there is genuine bug
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715584
That should have been corrected already
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699770). I've DUP'd your
bug, and reopened the original as it doesn't appea
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20110620
TOPIC: Gnome Shell duplicate application names
* Upstream GNOME not interested in resolving duplicate application
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2011-06-20
# Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's that time again. I've included a few topics for discussion below.
As always, feel free to respond to this mail with addition
Greetings,
I'd like to draw attention to the QA retrospective wiki page, and
initial draft of recommendations, for Fedora 15.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_QA_Retrospective#Recommendations
During the release, some of you have been documenting issues (good +
bad) as they happen. We ha
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 13:51 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> Oh, I noticed it yesterday as well. I just modified the 'name' a bit to
> include letters. It seems work now.:)
Oops, I changed the template in the staging instance, and thought I
carried that change forward into production. Thanks for fixing :)
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2011-06-13
# Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
I'm afraid I don't have a slew of topics that demand meeting time today.
However, there are a few items worthy of a mailing list u
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 13:06 -0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I was writing [1], I've noticed that using | , = and - breaks
> command rendering so I've replaced those chars with HTML codes (see
> below), if there's better solution, please tell me
>
> {{command| ifconfig | grep in
Minutes and IRC log can be found on that wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20110606
TOPIC: Release criteria updates
==
* vhumpa started a discussion on test + desktop lists last week -
http://lists.fedorapr
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2011-06-06
# Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's that time again. I've included a few topics for discussion below.
As always, feel free to respond to this mail with addition
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 14:04 +, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> On 06/01/2011 02:00 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I was reading some test-cases to improve my skills, and suddenly I've
> > noticed that tags are not rendered correctly, here's some examples
> > with this issue (there's
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 10:20 +0200, A.J. Werkman wrote:
> I just updated a F14 system to F15. After the update I can't login via
> the console. Login through the network over ssh is possible.
How did you update (DVD, preupgrade or yum)?
> Does this mean that the update procedure hasn't translate
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2011-05-30
# Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings folks,
I won't be available on IRC to host the QA meeting today. However, if
there is interest, and someone doesn't mind walking the agend
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 19:59 +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:09 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 18:56 +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 6:55 PM, mike cloaked
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20110523
TOPIC: F-15-Preparations
=
* Behold, the hot dog! -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers
*
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 18:56 +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 6:55 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
>
> > Attaching the root.log from the chroot.
>
> And additionally the versions of lorax and pungi within the chroot are:
> lorax-0.4.6-1.fc15.i686
> pungi-2.5-2.fc15.noarch
>
> Any add
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 13:13 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 05/23/2011 12:35 PM, James Laska wrote:
>
> >
> > I just completed a F-15 DVD install (no online repos enabled) on
> > baremetal. After installation and boot-up, the network is not enabled
> > (as e
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 18:34 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 22 May 2011 14:43:07 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > That's not accurate. The entry 'Network Settings...' at the bottom of
> > the network applet menu launches the control center Network applet,
>
> But if you install from a DVD
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 22:07 +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
> I have been trying to build f15 from the development/f15 plus f15
> updates repos using pungi from a mock chroot. I have been doing this
> process since f11 days.
>
> I use a standard .cfg file to create the chroot with the mock -r
> comma
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2011-05-23
# Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings,
Likely a brief meeting today. I don't have a large agenda planned. As
always, please respond to this email with any discussion topics or
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 16:17 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings testers,
>
> As requested in ticket#164 [1], a multi-spin DVD ISO image will be
> provided along-side Fedora 15. Ideally, this image would be prepared
> and tested at each milestone. For Fedora 15, the Multi-Spin
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 02:09 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 05/18/2011 02:03 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:
> > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I hope that's acceptable to all! If not, or anyone has ideas for
> >> improvement, do say so...
> > As a formerly
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 20:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 02:04 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 05/18/2011 01:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > to specify the basis on which QA's 'vote' at this meeting is cast. It's
> > > really entirely deterministic; there's
Greetings testers,
As requested in ticket#164 [1], a multi-spin DVD ISO image will be
provided along-side Fedora 15. Ideally, this image would be prepared
and tested at each milestone. For Fedora 15, the Multi-Spin DVD image
is not part of the release criteria, and completion of the tests is onl
1 - 100 of 517 matches
Mail list logo
