Thanks Andre! So far RC5 works fine for me, it fixes the selinux issue
on x86_64[1] and saving traceback to bugzilla problem[2]. So anyone
wants to try it, go ahead and help testing!
Thanks!
Hurry
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730863
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:46 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
>
> Security Lab:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Security_Lab_Test
>
Thanks Andre. I noticed the security lab test page doesn't contain a
link to the spins for testing ever since TC1 cycle. Anyone knows please
add
It's probably by design as I looked up the anaconda/changes page[1] and
found two features related:
* x86 uses GPT disklabels by default on all machines, even non-EFI.
* If a GPT boot disk is used on a non-EFI machine, a warning will be
displayed.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Chang
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 12:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Downloaded Fedora 16 Alpha TC1 netinstall iso x86_64 for a first brief
> look. Booted the included isolinux kernel+initrd. Cancelled the first
> LUKS passphrase prompt, but entered the passphrase for an experimental
> /home LV, which is s
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 00:31 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> After discussing with smooge and nirik on #fedora-admin, decided to change the
> 16 Alpha TC1 test matrix pages to use dl.fp.o instead of serverbeach1.fp.o and
> alt.fp.o for download links. If no problems are seen, the template pages can
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:05 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 18:45 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:30 +0300, Frederick William New wrote:
> > > > Comment:
> > > >
> > > > Replying to [comment:1 rhe]:
> > > &g
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:30 +0300, Frederick William New wrote:
> > Comment:
> >
> > Replying to [comment:1 rhe]:
> > > Agree. add a expected result in each kickstart test likeļ¼
> > >
> > > *
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Kickstart_Http_Server_Ks_Cfg
> >
> > The added expect
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:08 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> During the second Alpha blocker review meeting [1], I took an action
> item to propose several adjustments to the release criteria.
>
> Because of bug#723144, it was agreed that the existing installer
> partitioning-related Al
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 17:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks. Today's validation testing extension day: I've put the base
> validation process into 'production', and Athmane's done the same for
> the security lab spin validation process. Changes involve the SOP:
>
> https://fedoraproject
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 15:39 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback! Some follow-up below...
>
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 10:46 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > > Greetings testers,
> > >
> > > I've been playing with some ideas
Oh, I noticed it yesterday as well. I just modified the 'name' a bit to
include letters. It seems work now.:)
Thanks,
Hurry
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 01:15 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> Hello testers,
>
> Mediawiki 1.16 tag syntax has changed a bit [1], this breaks
> Result template see[2]
>
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 18:26 -0400, John Dulaney wrote:
> I am working on a draft btrfs test case (1) under the assumption
> that it will be default for F16. I'd appreciate any additions or
> suggestions for addition. Note that it isn't finished yet, I'm just
> done for the day.
>
> John.
>
>
>
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 18:57 +, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> On 06/01/2011 01:51 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 14:04 +, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> >> On 06/01/2011 02:00 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> ... SNIP ...
> >
> > I've made those changes to the pages you highlighted. T
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 13:50 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> On Sunday, May 29, 2011 13:44:56 Garry T. Williams wrote:
> > I upgraded to F15 from F14 using the DVD yeterday. I experienced a
> > few glitches:
>
> 6. Oh, I forgot to mention that there was no operating system log after
> the upgra
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 13:44 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote:
> I upgraded to F15 from F14 using the DVD yeterday. I experienced a
> few glitches:
>
> 1. I was not asked to include the updates repository during the
> update process. Sad. Now I will have to do an update after first
> boot.
>
> 2
Greetings testers,
Three Final Release candidates were posted recently, and validation
tests were heavily executed from RC1 to RC3 to verify that they meet the
final release criteria[1]. The FINAL Go/No-Go Meeting will be held later
today based on the status of RC3, whose validation test results
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 09:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 08:42 +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
>
> > Following up on my post:
> >
> > I booted into run level 3 and did a yum update. It found 12
> > packages
> > to install, 184 to updat
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 00:27 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here's my test result of PreUpgrading from F13 to F15, I've also updated
> F15RC3 test result wiki page.
>
> System: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Athmane/Fedora_Testing
>
> Test case:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 01:46 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/16/2011 01:02 AM, BeartoothHOS wrote:
> >
> > After several false tries, I did get a DVD which upgraded my
> > previous release candidate (from preupgrade on F140, or said it had. Fwiw,
> > the situation is unchanged, despite th
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 04:33 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Andre Robatino
> wrote:
> As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Final Release
> Candidate 2
> (RC2) is now available for testing. Please see the following
> pa
Thanks, and notice that X would fail to start after DVD default install,
see the bug for more info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704042
Hurry
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 05:51 -0400, Vitezslav Humpa wrote:
> Great! I will do some desktop testing like last time.
>
> - Original Mes
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 12:26 +0530, Pratyush Sahay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Tried installing F15 TC1 from a USB DVD media, created using
> UNetBootin from F15-i386-dvd.iso image.
> The installer exits after the "Boot Loader OS list" step, the error
> being shown :
>
> No Network Available.. some of th
Greetings testers,
Final TC1 was online at the beginning of this week, and validation tests
were under executing during the week. It's exciting to see that less and
less issues were identified from previous candidates to the current,
hereby the test results were summarized as below:
**
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 21:30 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:29:32 -0400
> Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> > Or do I no longer need the install.img file and can go
> > back to just pointing to the iso image itself like I used
> > to do before things changed a while back?
>From F-15, just
Hi Andre,
Thanks for the deltaiso executable, it works great. From the notes on
'what to test' part[1], I spent some time reading the explanation from
the two mails you linked to finally find these executables. Then I think
if it would be more convenient if there's a direct link to them saying
th
Greetings testers,
As you've known that Beta has been declared gold, validation tests were
being executed to guarantee that Beta RC2 could finally meet the beta
release criteria[1]. During the tests, as expected, no beta blockers
were found and the results were summarized as below:
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 03:48 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> 1) In the boot menu, there is a "Verify and Boot" option, but I didn't see any
> evidence of a verify being done. I know that the netinst install disc no
> longer
> has a mediacheck. Is this also true for live images? If a verify is being
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 12:40 +0600, Angel wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Andre Robatino
> wrote:
> As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Beta RC1 is now
> available
> for testing.
>
> Did this version include the latest GNOME 3 which released on 6th?
It
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 22:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 23:38 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Beta RC1 is now available
> > for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and
> > testing instructions.
>
> Heads
Thank you, Andre.
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 23:38 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Beta RC1 is now available
> for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and
> testing instructions.
>
> Installation:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Te
Greetings testers,
Thanks for your involvement and attention on this test event. During
that day preupgrade-1.1.9-1 was built on time for testing, for most
testers, preupgrading went on smoothly before encountering the lorax
issue[1]. The bugs filed were summarized here:
Bug 688761 - NEW - preup
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 18:30 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 05:02 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Gregory Woodbury
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 05:02 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Gregory Woodbury
> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:26 AM, He Rui
> wrote:Let me point to Bugzilla #684054.
>
>
Greetings everyone,
Preupgrade test day is coming up tomorrow! It's available at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Current
As you've noticed that install.img is included in initrd.img From F-15
builds, the procedure of preupgrade need be changed accordingly.
Therefore, packages with pat
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 16:23 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 17:06 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 10:19 -0500, James Laska wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 18:01 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:43 -0500, Jam
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 16:23 -0400, Andrew Ross wrote:
> > > Sorry ,I am not clear about the necessity of import result form
> > > another test run,is it mean those test run very similar, so why make
> > > a
> > > new run?Do you explain some more detail about this feature's
> > > scenario ?
> > >
>
Hi Danqing,
Many thanks for replying this mail.
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 16:59 +0800, Danqing Li wrote:
> Hi ,thank you very much for this great feature requirement list.
>
> On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:01 PM, He Rui wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:43 -0500, James Laska w
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 10:19 -0500, James Laska wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 18:01 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:43 -0500, James Laska wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 18:06 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> >
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:43 -0500, James Laska wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 18:06 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Now let's continue the discussion[1] about TCMS management. After the
> > feature comparison between wiki and nitrate, the features wh
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 15:19 -0300, Igor Pires Soares wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm really glad we successfully finished our internationalization and
> localization testing marathon for these release cycle. I'm also glad to
> see that some bugs are already closed or modified. For Fedora 15 the
> intentio
Greetings,
Now let's continue the discussion[1] about TCMS management. After the
feature comparison between wiki and nitrate, the features which are
supported in current wiki, but not in nitrate have been identified[2].
Among these, I priorized some of them as Must-have features, which were
summar
On 03/02/2011 08:58 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> This should also be listed as an F15Beta issue:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678689
>
> In a nutshell, you can't install F15Alpha RC1/2 to an intel IMSM RAID.
>
There should be more F15Beta/F15Blocker install bugs than listed. This
Greetings,
F-15-Alpha-RC2 was recently online and tested. As expected, the keyboard
layout issue, firstboot crash and mesa 32-bit were confirmed fixed in
this build. Later Go/No-Go meeting will be held to determine if it meets
Alpha release criteria[1]. Here installation and desktop bugs are liste
Greetings everyone!
Tomorrow we will continue the localization and internationalization test
day focusing on: I18n Desktop[1]. Tests on this day will mainly cover
the yum langpack, font/rendering in applications as well as the input
method.
If you are interested, feel free to post your results o
Greetings,
Thanks for your attention on F-15 Alpha RC#1 test event. Alpha priority
tests and most of other test cases against installation and desktop have
been executed and a list of bugs are classified as below:
Installation *
* F15Alph
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 15:39 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 03:35 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 02/11/2011 03:32 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >> Has anyone been able to boot the F15 Alpha TC1 image as a kvm guest? On my
> >> CentOS 5.5 host I get some kind of kernel crash.
> >>
> >
> >
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:12 +0100, Christoph Frieben wrote:
> 2011/2/10 Andre Robatino:
> > Fedora 15 Alpha TC1 is now available [1].
>
> Beware: unlike the earlier snaphot "Fedora 15 Alpha TC1" of last
> month, the current installer v15.19 will ultimately --abort-- after
> choosing "create custom
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 23:52 -0600, John Watzke wrote:
>Should we expect to still be hooked up to the rawhide repo for TC1
> or should we manually change over to updates-testing?
F-15 is supposed to be branched at this time, but currently the default
repo is still rawhide. Is branching delayed?
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 23:05 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 19:02 +, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
>
> > > I do like litmus! It's a nice evolution from testopia for
> > upstream
> > > mozilla. We don't currently have an 'unclear' test result.
> >
Greetings,
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 14:09 -0500, James Laska wrote:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2011-01-24
> # Time: 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 17:00 CET) [1]
> # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
>
> Greetings folks,
>
> This is a reminder that we have a QA meeting sched
Greetings,
Many thanks for Samuel's comments, I found out many valuable things to
think, identify and add to use cases/feature comparison.
The questions also remind me that many testers so far may be still not
familiar with Nitrate, therefore can't give any suggestion upon it. So
I'll introduce N
Please ignore the last mail.
Hi James,
Wow, firstly, many thanks for your careful review of all the items.:)
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 16:08 -0500, James Laska wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 19:36 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> > Greetings!
> >
> > Wiki workflow/use cases are reorg
Hi James,
Wow, firstly, many thanks for your careful review of all the items.:)
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 16:08 -0500, James Laska wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 19:36 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> > Greetings!
> >
> > Wiki workflow/use cases are reorganized and grouped by general and
Greetings!
Wiki workflow/use cases are reorganized and grouped by general and main
test events(runs) use cases. The general cases cover the basic uses of
wiki, and the events cases covers the detailed certain steps for
organizing the events.
Please review it:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/t
Hi Hongqing,
Glad to see you here! I know there maybe many staff for you to learn at
the beginning, but based on your background, you'll adapt the
environment and 'Fedora QA style' pretty soon. Here are some
introduction pages for your reference:
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA
[2] https://
Hi Chen Gang,
Gerard is right, you need double check what he suggested. Btw, you've
been well known in the Chinese list already, I've seen they gave you
different suggestions and welcomes there[1][2]. Subscribe it and say
hello to them!
Thanks,
Hurry
[1]
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/piperma
Greetings Xuan.ai,
How are you doing?! It's really exciting to see you here and thanks for
your passion on the testing of Fedora. The QA page[1] gives an
introduction of what Fedora QA routines are, and please refer to the
join page[2] to get involved regarding to your interest. And I'm sure
this
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 21:52 +0800, Chen Gang-Cuble wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I'm a Chinese man, I'm a software engineer. Familiar with C/C++. I have
> about 7 years experience on software developing.
>
> I'm new to Linux. I have read a few books before, but just began to use
> it a few days ago. I have j
On 10/26/2010 07:40 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> - "Kamil Paral" wrote:
>
>
>> In this test case
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
>>
>> there's this sentence:
>> # On the Save dialog, choose Remote server from the destination
>> list.
>>
>
Greetings,
As you can see in the bug list summarized below, Test results of
F-14-Final-RC1 are positive so far, no blocker bugs were found when
executing the tests. Many thanks for the hard working of developers,
rel-engineers, and testers to keep improve the quality of Fedora.
=
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 12:40 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:14 +0200, Christoph Frieben wrote:
> > 2010/10/25 Qiang Li:
> > > What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?
> >
> > You grab the most recent install media, e.g. F14 RC1, and add the
> > rawhide repo
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 04:43 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> In this test case
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
>
> there's this sentence:
> # On the Save dialog, choose Remote server from the destination list.
>
> However, after hitting Save butto
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 09:23 +1100, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> People,
>
> When do the other Live CD ISO's follow?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phil.
Hi Phil,
Jkeating Replied in the ticket[1] saying "Some are posted now. More
tomorrow".
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4168
>
> On 2010-10-22 0
Greetings testers,
Fedora 14 Final TC validation test event has come to an end, this time
we have more testers participating in the events and therefore more bugs
were identified including blocker bugs, so many thanks for the ones who
leaded/attended/payed attention on the test event. As before, t
Greetings folks,
We've nearly finished all the tests in the installation test result page
with the contribution of testers and now there's only one test left for
testing:
QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_efidisk.img
This test validates booting from a efidisk.img on a system capable of
supporting EFI. Th
Thanks for sharing this Mike, it's very useful for testing the anaconda
package in the updates-testing repo.
Cheers,
Hurry
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 17:17 +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
> There is currently version anaconda-14.20-1.fc14 in updates-testing
> but I seem to be the only one who has tested i
Hi Tom,
Your problem seems similar to the commonbug below:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F14_bugs#Error_setting_up_repository_-_16.2C_Device_busy
There's an updates.img in the link to work around the problem. Does it
work for you?
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 19:23 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 10:42 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> I would like to have a clear story from anaconda or whoever on what
> exactly is supported in terms of writing the DVD image to USB, and what
> isn't. I've never been particularly clear on that point. It would be
> good to clear it up a
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 21:05 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On 26/09/10 19:24, Steven Haigh wrote:
> >
> > I have lodged this:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637495
> >
> > I have attached to it what I saw looked to be the required logs.
>
> For the record, installing on a laptop wit
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 16:44 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
> On 26/09/10 13:53, He Rui wrote:
> > Hi Steven,
> >
> > On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 03:43 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've tried just about everything over the last 12 h
Greetings,
It's time to summarize F-14 Beta RC validation tests. Apologies for the
absence of some RC3 install testing, but I'm glad to see that it went on
smoothly, so special thanks for the ones who helped executing the cases.
Though Beta has been declared gold based on the Beta release
criterio
Hi Steven,
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 03:43 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've tried just about everything over the last 12 hours to get F14 Beta 3 to
> install from DVD with no success.
>
> I've been booting from the DVD and found that at the repo selection screen,
> only internet repos a
Thanks for your announcement, Andre. I will be away on holidays in the
following three days, so testers please help validate the DVD, CD and
Live Image installation tests[1]. Thanks in advance!
Rgds,
Hurry
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
On Tue, 2010-09
Greetings testers,
Again, thanks to the hard working of developers, release engineers and
testers, F-14-Beta-TC1 was posted and the tests have been executed. Here
I summarize the test results from installation and desktop sides grouped
by release criterion:
* *Installatio
Greetings Testers,
Anaconda Translation&Keyboard Test Day is coming up tomorrow:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Current
This day will mainly focus on the translation and keyboard in different
languages during installation. Test cases have been well prepared on the
wiki page with the he
Greetings testers,
As scheduled, F-14 Beta Test Compose is going to be available soon,
please keep attention on it and execute the installation[1] and
desktop[2] tests to help ensure that the F-14 Beta Release Criterion is
met[3].
Test result pages with detailed testing instructions are at:
h
Greetings,
Many thanks for the ones who attended this test day, though we don't
have much attendance, the general tests for preupgrade have been nicely
covered with its bugs filed and verified.
The common issue testers encountered during preupgrade has been
identified to be an anaconda bug:
62
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 18:56 -0600, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> When trying to install Alpha 14, it comes to a halt with this error
> message:
> Line 65 does not end with %%end. I don't understand that. Please
> advise.
Did you install with kickstart file? If yes, you need the "%end" there
in the
Greetings,
Preupgrade test day is coming up tomorrow:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Current
Several problems have been reported when preupgrading to F-14 Alpha,
this day we will focus on preupgrade[1] to summarize the issues. The
tests were designed to cover general circumstances, incl
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 08:51 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:24 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I just created a case for testing preupgrade-cli. Anyone who is
> > interested in it or used to upgrade by using this command pleas
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 18:08 -0400, Andy Lawrence wrote:
> Please see bug:
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627377
>
>
> Any suggestions on further info/help I can provide?
>
I've filed a bug#624971 earlier about this issue, and probably like
Chris Bagwell said, it misused /im
Greetings,
I just created a case for testing preupgrade-cli. Anyone who is
interested in it or used to upgrade by using this command please help
review this test:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Preupgrade_cli
Any suggestion/correction/comment is welcomed. And preupgrade test
day[1] i
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 21:37 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627058
>
I can reproduce this hard disk install issue. I've also made some tests
and it's probably because that the directories specified under the disk
are not honored as kernel parameters, which m
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 09:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 19:04 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> > Greetings testers,
> >
> > Thanks for all your attention and participation on the F-14 Alpha RC
> > validation test events, especially for Andre's le
Greetings testers,
Thanks for all your attention and participation on the F-14 Alpha RC
validation test events, especially for Andre's leading of the events,
quite a mount of bugs were identified and fixed until RC4 was posted and
finally meets Alpha Release Criteria[1].
As always, here I summari
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 08:08 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 17/08/10 22:17, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 21:45 +0200, Zoltan Kota wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Is there a recommended way to upgrade my F13 system to F14
> >> (branched/alpha)? I couldn't manage to install F14 alpha R
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 15:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 19:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi, folks. Quite a lot of release criteria proposals came out of today's
> > go/no-go meeting. I'll propose them formally for discussion and addition
> > to the official criteri
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 23:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
> > status is unclear:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985
>
> A follow up to th
Greeting,
I have an urgent thing to deal with tomorrow morning, will be back at noon.
Thanks,
Hurry
--
Contacts
FAS name: Rhe
IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa
Email: r...@redhat.com
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 04:42 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> - "He Rui" wrote:
> > I don't intend to cover all the memtest features, but think we should
> > at
> > least check if there's a test result shown to reflect the test,
> > that's
>
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 03:18 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> - "He Rui" wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2. Test report is shown once a test is completed.
> > >
> > > The test is never completed, it runs infinitely over and over
> > again.
> &g
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 02:30 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> - "Andre Robatino" wrote:
>
> > James Laska redhat.com> writes:
> >
> > > I believe the {netinst,boot}.iso are intended to fit on a 700M cdr.
> >
> > I edited
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_ISO_Size
> >
Hi Kamil,
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 06:27 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> I want to discuss the QA:Testcase Memtest86 [1] from our F14 installation
> matrix.
>
> The test case is a little weird to me and took me quite some time to
> understand what to test and when to report outcome.
>
> > How to test:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 12:47 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 08:31 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > In our F14 installation matrix [1] we have these test cases:
> > * QA:Testcase_Mediakit_Repoclosure
> > * QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts
> > specified for "Live.iso installation" se
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 13:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 09:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 18:09 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 02:28 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> > > > With the def
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 00:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 00:49 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
> > pages for download links and testing instructions.
> >
> > Installation:
> >
> > https://fedoraproj
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 02:28 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> With the default driver of the basic video driver,
> RC3 still goes to a blank screen using Core Duo
> and ATU 5670 display card. The keyboard still
> seems to work but without a working graphics
> it's hosed.
>
> As before
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 13:41 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi F14 testers,
>
> I'm having a F14/RC1 (i686)running, and now I burned the F14/RC2/DVD
> (i686), booted from that DVD with saying "update an existing system". I
> answered the question
> for the partition to update (is the F14/RC1). Then
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 20:11 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 08/08/10 17:50, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >> Have uploaded boot image using virt-manager (rawvirt.repo)
> >> http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-080810-134240.php
> >>
> >> Thought this was a fixed bug?
> >
> > It should be. Can you
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 14:08 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There's a kernel panic in the first stage of anaconda in x86_64 boot.iso
> (probably in other x86_64 images as well):
>
> Bug 621775 - kernel panic- not syncing: VFS : unable to mount root fs on
> unknown-b
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
