On 11.06.2015 11:06, poma wrote:
> On 31.05.2015 20:08, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> And already we have fought for this user's side simplification, but it
>>> seems developers are very persistent when they do not need to be.
>>
>> In the past changes with this effect were reverted. This time they w
On 09.06.2015 15:45, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> On 09.06.2015 15:28, poma wrote:
>> On 09.06.2015 13:39, poma wrote:
>>> On 08.06.2015 16:25, poma wrote:
>>>> On 08.06.2015 16:23, poma wrote:
>>>>> On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote:
>>>>>> On
On 09.06.2015 15:28, poma wrote:
> On 09.06.2015 13:39, poma wrote:
>> On 08.06.2015 16:25, poma wrote:
>>> On 08.06.2015 16:23, poma wrote:
On 03.06.2015 08:13, poma wrote:
> On 01.06.2015 09:15, poma wrote:
>>
>> "Failed to mount /sysroot" occurs with recent Rawhide Live images.
On 12/14/2013 01:49 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 15:49 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Dec 13, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>> I meant to write this test case anyhow, but today's brown paper bag bug
>>> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-10871/dracut-029-1.fc19
Thank you!
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 21.03.2013 07:44, schrieb Andre Robatino:
> *IMPORTANT*: All DVDs and Lives are oversized, so will not fit on the
> standard media. The 64-bit DVD and netinst should hopefully be posted
> soon.
>
> As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alph
Am 18.03.2013 10:44, schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 21:18:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>>> No worries. The trouble has started _after_ updating with --nogpgcheck,
>>> however. The updated installation doesn't boot anymore with errors
>>> about systemd, plymouth, dbus, connec
Am 15.03.2013 18:39 schrieb "Adam Williamson" :
>
> On 15/03/13 05:09 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>>
>> In case you were not bitten by Schrödinger's Cat in Grub or got around
her, you
>> might run in dracut/systemd problems in the initramfs.
>>
>> Y
Yes
Am 15.03.2013 18:40 schrieb "Dennis Gilmore" :
>
> And you also built for rawhide? If not it will never get the fix
>
>
> Harald Hoyer wrote:
>>
>> They are in F19, so the nightly compose should pick them up, shouldn't
it?
>>
>> Am 15.
to use nightly
> composes.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Martin Holec
> Desktop QE, Red Hat Brno
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Harald Hoyer"
> To: "test@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Beta"
>
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 201
Am 15.03.2013 16:00, schrieb John Reiser:
>> # koji download-build --arch=$(arch) systemd-198-6.fc19
>> # koji download-build --arch=$(arch) dracut-026-48.git20130315.fc19
>> # rpm -Fvh systemd*.rpm dracut*.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> systemd = 198-4.fc19 is needed by (installed) libg
In case you were not bitten by Schrödinger's Cat in Grub or got around her, you
might run in dracut/systemd problems in the initramfs.
You will have to update to at least
systemd-198-6.fc19 and dracut-026-48.git20130315.fc19
for a working initramfs.
# koji download-build --arch=$(arch) systemd-19
Am 09.07.2012 12:09, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
> Am 09.07.2012 09:44, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
>> Do not install dracut-020-51!
>>
>> Sorry for those, who have been bitten by dracut-020-51. Instead of
>> installing to
>> the /var/tmp/initramfs.* directory, it installed i
Added an automatic test in the dracut testsuite, so that this never happens
again.. Sorry for the inconvenience. Yes, rawhide sometimes eats babies.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Am 09.07.2012 09:44, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
> Do not install dracut-020-51!
>
> Sorry for those, who have been bitten by dracut-020-51. Instead of installing
> to
> the /var/tmp/initramfs.* directory, it installed in your real root.
>
> To remove most (if not all) of the fi
Do not install dracut-020-51!
Sorry for those, who have been bitten by dracut-020-51. Instead of installing to
the /var/tmp/initramfs.* directory, it installed in your real root.
To remove most (if not all) of the files, it has installed, do the following:
# rm /.bash_history
# rm /dracut-state.
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(0,0)
this means there was no initramfs even loaded
check your bootloader config and the existence of the initramfs image
Am 23.05.2012 13:09 schrieb "Frank Murphy" :
> On 23/05/12 11:10, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Am 23.05.2012 11:17, schrieb Frank Murphy:
> Anyone else have a kernel-panic
> with initramfs created by:
> dracut-018-74.git20120522.fc18
>
>
How exactly does the kernel panic look like? Normally, you are dropped to a
shell.
you can get more debug info, if you add "rd.debug rd.shell loglevel=
Am 05.02.2012 16:45 schrieb "Bruno Wolff III" :
>
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 13:43:14 +,
> Rawhide Report wrote:
> > Compose started at Sun Feb 5 08:15:09 UTC 2012
>
> Trying to update to today's rawhide is either broken or has a seriously
> misleading error message. When I tried I got:
> Run
you forgot to convert with dracut before yum upgrade... right??
Am 30.01.2012 22:11 schrieb "Orion Poplawski" :
> On 01/30/2012 12:17 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> On 01/27/2012 06:10 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>>
>>> Until the rawhide repository gets al
gt; On 01/27/2012 02:10 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
>
>> SELinux relabelling should take effect after you rebooted your updated
>> system
>> and can take a long time (at least in a VM it takes insanely long and is
>> still
>> not finished). We are currently investigating
Am 27.01.2012 14:10, schrieb Harald Hoyer:
> ...
> Download and install the most recent dracut package from rawhide:
> # yum --enablerepo=rawhide update dracut
> ...
you should have at least: dracut-014-77.git20120126.fc17
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
Hello Testers and rawhide Users,
Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The directories
/bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks:
/bin → /usr/bin
/sbin → /usr/sbin
/lib → /usr/lib
/lib64 → /usr/lib64
Some reasoning behind this change is outlined here:
http://w
fix: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/systemd-33-2.fc16
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Am 30.05.2011 00:28, schrieb sean darcy:
> yum upgrade systemd
> ..
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package systemd.x86_64 0:26-1.fc15 will be updated
> --> Processing Dependency: systemd = 26-1.fc15 for package:
> systemd-sysv-26-1.fc15.x86_64
> ---> Package systemd.x86_64
Am 16.05.2011 20:03, schrieb Bill Nottingham:
> Tom Horsley (horsley1...@gmail.com) said:
>> I've been fooling with the systemctl (unfortunately similar
>> to the sysctl name) tool, and I see "units" for all the
>> devices on my system with long names something like
>> sys-pci-yadda-yadda.device.
On 09/15/2010 10:38 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> drago01 (drag...@gmail.com) said:
>>> Will there be the same reversion in rawhide too?
>>
>> No.
>
> In fact, I'm strongly debating flipping it so systemd is mandatory; it
> enables us to actually merge the changes that allow for cleaner
> startup/
On 09/09/2010 07:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:45:59 +0200
> Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>
>> 2010/9/9 Harald Hoyer:
>>> On 09/07/2010 02:41 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I want to compare systemd and
On 09/07/2010 02:41 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to compare systemd and upstart boot speed (I don't expect much,
> so I won't be disappointed :))
>
> systemd
> http://i56.tinypic.com/ilk4fq.jpg
>
> upstart
> http://i53.tinypic.com/dnhrvm.png
>
> both starts system in 31 seconds, bu
29 matches
Mail list logo
