Thanks to everyone who participated in the FCOS 35 test day/week

2021-10-20 Thread Dusty Mabe
l/416 The full test day results page can be viewed at: https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/122 We do still have some platforms that weren't tested so feel free to execute those test cases! Dusty Mabe ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedorap

Re: Fedora 32 Final validation testing: Cloud

2020-04-15 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 4/15/20 3:42 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! So I'm checking over the F32 Final validation test results > for the current RC (1.3) and one thing we're missing is Cloud tests: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_32_RC_1.3_Cloud > > so far we only have the results fro

Re: Validation testing enhancement: AMI information

2019-11-14 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 11/13/19 6:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! Hey Adam! > > So as part of the 'xen -> ec2' criteria migration, I noticed that it's > not really easy to find the appropriate AMIs for testing validation > candidate composes in EC2. I decided to make that better! > > I've enhanced wik

Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen

2019-11-02 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 11/1/19 5:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 14:58 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 7:16 PM Adam Williamson >> wrote: >>> OK, so, to move forward with this (and looping in cloud list): does >>> someone want to propose a set (ideally small - 2 would be gre

Re: Proposing new release criteria

2019-09-30 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 8/29/19 10:33 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > I don't know the formal process for proposal but here is a shot at a bare > minimum > start for trying to add containers to the existing release criteria. This is > a suggestion > after we found podman can't pull containers

Re: Proposing new release criteria

2019-08-30 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 8/30/19 9:36 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:33 PM Dusty Mabe <mailto:du...@dustymabe.com>> wrote: > > I don't know the formal process for proposal but here is a shot at a bare > minimum > start for trying to add containers to the ex

Re: Proposing new release criteria

2019-08-29 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 8/29/19 2:36 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote: > On 8/29/19 2:16 PM, Mairi Dulaney wrote: >> On Lùna 29, 2019 aig 10:33:09m -0400, sgrìobh Dusty Mabe: >>> I don't know the formal process for proposal but here is a shot at a bare >>> minimum >>> start for

Re: Proposing new release criteria

2019-08-29 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 8/29/19 11:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2019-08-29 at 10:33 -0400, Dusty Mabe wrote: >> I don't know the formal process for proposal > > Congratulations, you found it - mail this list, ideally including at > least one of the strings 'criter' or

Re: Proposing new release criteria

2019-08-29 Thread Dusty Mabe
> I don't know the formal process for proposal but here is a shot at a bare > minimum > start for trying to add containers to the existing release criteria. There is at least one deliverable that delivers podman in the image (Silverblue). Silverblue isn't release blocking. I don't know if there

Proposing new release criteria

2019-08-29 Thread Dusty Mabe
I don't know the formal process for proposal but here is a shot at a bare minimum start for trying to add containers to the existing release criteria. This is a suggestion after we found podman can't pull containers from a registry in f31 [1]. New section for Containers and Container tools: - A

Re: Fedora-29-updates-20190823.0 compose check report

2019-08-23 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 8/22/19 10:46 PM, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64) > > ID: 434613Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi > URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/434613 > > Passed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64) > C

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 28 Candidate RC-1.1 Available Now!

2018-04-25 Thread Dusty Mabe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 04/25/2018 02:36 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 28 Candidate RC-1.1 is now > available for testing. Here are the Cloud Base AMIs for RC-1.1: Fedora-Cloud-Base-28-1.1.x86_64 ap-northeast-1 ami-a600e6d9

Re: Fedora-Atomic 27-20180407.0 compose check report

2018-04-07 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 04/07/2018 03:54 AM, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) > Can we get these emails to go to ato...@lists.fedoraproject.org? Dusty ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Cloud Base validation tests missing for Fedora 28 Beta

2018-03-29 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 03/29/2018 08:56 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 03/28/2018 09:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> Hi folks! I noticed that none of the Base validation tests for Cloud >> have been run for F28 Beta: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Ba