On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 11:31 +0200, Cristian Sava wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 11:06 +0200, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I installed a f23 server (fedora server only) and I configured 2
> > bridged interfaces.
> > Now I allow forward traffic betw
On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 11:06 +0200, Cristian Sava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed a f23 server (fedora server only) and I configured 2
> bridged interfaces.
> Now I allow forward traffic between br0 and br1:
>
> [root@s ~]# firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD
Hi,
I installed a f23 server (fedora server only) and I configured 2
bridged interfaces.
Now I allow forward traffic between br0 and br1:
[root@s ~]# firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -i
br0 -o br1 -j ACCEPT
success
[root@s ~]# firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FOR
Tried Fedora server (cli, no graphics) and it does not shutdown nor
> > I
> > can get root rights even I am root!
>
>
> Does it work if as root you do "setenforce 0; reboot"
Yes, it works! Thank you for the tip.
After reboot is ok.
But ...
Fedora 23 beta rc1 seems ok and after updates appeared th
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 04:20 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> - installed F23 Beta 1 Workstation x86_64 on external disk from usb
> flash medium
> - dnf update
> - installation of about 20 user programs
> - Gnome SW utility update was requested by the system
> - Gnome SW utility update started
>
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 08:28 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Whoops, I forgot to CC the QA list on this. If you wish to volunteer for
> any part of this, PLEASE make sure that ser...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> is listed in the TO: or CC: lines, or we will probably miss it.
I'm using Fedora for serv
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 17:26 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On 2013-07-03 1:47, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > > I have a server with two NICs (on-board and attached).
> > > HW: ASRock H67M-GE + I3-2120 + 8GB + 1TB (h
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2013-07-03 1:47, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > I have a server with two NICs (on-board and attached).
> > HW: ASRock H67M-GE + I3-2120 + 8GB + 1TB (hdd, sata)
>
> > 1) Why "route" shows iface=p4p1, p5p1
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 2013-07-03 1:47, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > I have a server with two NICs (on-board and attached).
> > HW: ASRock H67M-GE + I3-2120 + 8GB + 1TB (hdd, sata)
>
> > 1) Why "route" shows iface=p4p1, p5p1
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 11:47 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> After updating aujour:
>
> The external network is not reachable anymore but the internal network
> is ok if NM is enabled and working.
> This setup does not work with network service anymore.
> Any advice how to fix
I have a server with two NICs (on-board and attached).
HW: ASRock H67M-GE + I3-2120 + 8GB + 1TB (hdd, sata)
[root@physics network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-enp4s0
IPV6_PEERDNS="yes"
IPV6INIT="yes"
UUID="b43c0128-ec02-4793-98c9-f396fb9438d2"
IPADDR1="192.168.1.1"
IPADDR0="172.16.0.1"
PREFIX1="24"
PREFIX0
What is
kde-plasma-networkmanagement-openconnect-0.9.0.8-3.fc19.x86_64.r
in Fedora-19-x86_64-DVD.iso (.../Packages)?
My download does not seem wrong?
C. Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 23:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 08:51 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > After recent updates fail2ban was broken again.
>
> For this kind of thing, the appropriate thing to do is file a bug
> report. It doesn't make much
8:33:09 s198.xx.yy.ro fail2ban-server[2086]:
fail2ban.jail : ...
Jun 19 08:33:09 s198.xx.yy.ro systemd[1]: Started Fail2ban Service.
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
0
euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 ses=4294967295 tty=(none)
comm=accounts-daemon exe=/usr/libexec/accounts-daemon
subj=system_u:system_r:accountsd_t:s0 key=(null)
Hash: accounts-daemon,accountsd_t,var_log_t,dir,read
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedorapro
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 14:48 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> Trying to install F19-tc3-x64 on VirtualBox-4.2.12 on Win7_x64 with
> success. Sssd trouble on anaconda.
> I succeeded to install TC2 on VBox on F18-x64.
Typo error, I want to say "no cuccess"
C. Sava
--
tes
Trying to install F19-tc3-x64 on VirtualBox-4.2.12 on Win7_x64 with
success. Sssd trouble on anaconda.
I succeeded to install TC2 on VBox on F18-x64.
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
ats for the new Fedora!
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
2/numer/8/nazwa/ip-link
It should do.
Anyway you will have to make ifcfg-... by hand and do things
accordingly.
ip link ... is for use in rc.local.
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
I can also confirm that something like DEVICE=p2p1:0 in ifcfg-enp0s3:0 is now
working with both NetworkManager or network!!!
Congrats! Great work done!
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 10:59 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> I am testing F19-TC2 LXDE in a VirtualBox.
> Now "network" instead NM is working as expected.
>
> We do not have the "device" mentioned in
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp0s3
>
> How i
485"
IPV6_PEERDNS="yes"
DEFROUTE="yes"
PEERDNS="yes"
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL="no"
HWADDR="08:00:27:88:5C:09"
BOOTPROTO="dhcp"
IPV6_DEFROUTE="yes"
IPV6_AUTOCONF="yes"
IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL="no"
IPV6_PEERROUTES="
cripts
> I am not sure whether you need it in both the main and vlan ifcfg files.
> You may have to try to add it in both, but at least the vlan files need
> it
There are some related bugs already reported
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964139)
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
e to choose what
and how to install on his PC.
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
existing system.)
>
+1
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
ook?
>
> Just curious :-).
Sometime back I had a similar problem and I discovered that my old grub
install (other partition) was used. Do you mind to check?
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
mail/users/2013-January/429440.html
After all, why to get rid of this way of dual boot capability for non
UEFI systems, for non encrypted dual boot?
What is the big advantage to not have that?
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Sat, 2013-06-08 at 22:34 +0200, Lars Seipel wrote:
> It took me a while to figure out you're not talking about Fedora
> packages but RPMs/specfiles provided by some 3rd party. Please make this
> a bit clearer next time.
Well, our server is somehow similar to
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-use
bit the rules and accept
some little changes to default and let people use their desired
software. Sometimes a very simple option can make miracles.
And now a very very good thing:
Fedora 19 seems to me a rock solid distribution!
Congrats to all of you!
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 07:57 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:18:51 +0300,
>Cristian Sava wrote:
> >I will consider your suggestion but this may take time and testing. It
> >is not for today or tomorrow and not all the people will agree with us.
>
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 09:41 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 06/05/2013 01:59 AM, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 11:40 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >> On 06/04/2013 05:06 AM, Cristian Sava wrote:
> >>> I am trying to activate selinu
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 00:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 09:18 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 08:08 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 12:06 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > > > I am trying to acti
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 08:08 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 12:06 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > I am trying to activate selinux for my mailserver.
> > It is F19 postfix_courier_amavisd-new_clamav_squirrelmail install in a
> > virtual environment. All n
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 11:40 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 06/04/2013 05:06 AM, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > I am trying to activate selinux for my mailserver. It is F19
> > postfix_courier_amavisd-new_clamav_squirrelmail install in a virtual
> > environment. All needed is sto
I am trying to activate selinux for my mailserver.
It is F19 postfix_courier_amavisd-new_clamav_squirrelmail install in a
virtual environment. All needed is stock or was packaged on F19
(rpmbuild -ta ... / rpmbuild -ba ...) and all is working fine (selinux
disabled). No tar.gz directly installed.
I
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 10:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I don't recall seeing reports of anything in particular being changed in
> this area. Are you sure this behaviour differs from previous releases?
> --
I am saying that something similar to
# cd /var/spool/postfix
# mkdir etc
# cd e
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 12:33 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> Partial solution found:
>
> # cd /var/spool/postfix
> # mkdir etc
> # cd etc
> # cp /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Bucharest localtime
> # postfix check
> # postfix reload
>
We also need to edit php.ini and set
] (s194.central.xxx.yy [193.www.zzz.194])
by ns.central.xxx.yy (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4S8mOLs011307
for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 11:48:24 +0300
Message-ID: <1369731412.11701.0.ca...@s194.central.xxx.yy>
Subject: [Fwd: Re: F19 - server, no graphics - time problem]
From: Cristian Sa
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 05:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 05/28/13 00:09, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > My F19 mail server shows messages with wrong time (UTC instead EEST),
> > ntpd is enabled and is working. The date command is showing the correct
> > time. Is it a bug some
ubject: [Fwd: Corectii privind adresa privind solicitarea de
informatii.]
From: Cristian Sava
To: ph_mailad...@physics.xxx.yy
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 18:49:10 +0300
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-nHKsl4yHLYYkAaTvg3ls"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4 (3.6.4-3.fc18)
Mime-Versi
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 12:20 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 09:21 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I need to have alias network interfaces.
> > What is the desired way to do this in F19?
> >
> > My actual setup (without alias):
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 09:21 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> Hi all,
> I need to have alias network interfaces.
> What is the desired way to do this in F19?
>
> My actual setup (without alias):
> [root@physics sysconfig]# ls network-scripts/ifcfg-*
> network-scripts/ifcfg-en
Hi all,
I need to have alias network interfaces.
What is the desired way to do this in F19?
My actual setup (without alias):
[root@physics sysconfig]# ls network-scripts/ifcfg-*
network-scripts/ifcfg-enp4s0 network-scripts/ifcfg-enp5s0
network-scripts/ifcfg-lo
[root@physics sysconfig]# cat networ
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 17:07 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I reported here
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-May/115379.html
> the missing /etc/sysconfig/network causing problems to amavis (solved in
> amavis).
> Now NetworkManager ignore ip_forw
Hi, all
I reported here
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-May/115379.html
the missing /etc/sysconfig/network causing problems to amavis (solved in
amavis).
Now NetworkManager ignore ip_forward and I switched to network
(NM_CONTROLLED=no).
No network after "systemctl restart networ
> and I do not see the reason why UID=992 GID=989 for clamupdate
> On the other install, real box without graphics install, such thing
> fail, so my hand fix with UID=992 and GID=992.
> Hope this helps.
>
Sorry for this mistake.
On the working install (F19 alpha & updates) we have
[root@s198 ~]# c
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 21:36 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sex, 2013-05-17 at 17:03 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 15:59 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > > Installing F19 mail server ... "clamupdate" user/group problem:
> > >
> >
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 15:59 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> Installing F19 mail server ... "clamupdate" user/group problem:
>
> [root@physics ~]# yum install amavisd-new spamassassin clamav
> clamav-data clamav-server clamav-server-sysvinit clamav-update unzip
> bzi
Installing F19 mail server ... "clamupdate" user/group problem:
[root@physics ~]# yum install amavisd-new spamassassin clamav
clamav-data clamav-server clamav-server-sysvinit clamav-update unzip
bzip2 pax
...
Running transaction check
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded
Running tr
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 10:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 09:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 13:28 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Amavis does not start because it does not find /etc/s
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 13:28 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Amavis does not start because it does not find /etc/sysconfig/network
> # yum install amavis
> # systemctl start amavisd.service
> ...
> # journalctl -xn
> ...
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/amavisd: line 16:
Hi all,
Amavis does not start because it does not find /etc/sysconfig/network
# yum install amavis
# systemctl start amavis.service
...
# journalctl -xn
...
/etc/rc.d/init.d/amavisd: line 16: /etc/sysconfig/network: No such file
or directory
I am testing a postfix based mailserver on F19 updated.
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 08:30 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Jonathan Kamens said:
> > This, however, is fine:
> >
> > [ "$WEBALIZER_CRON" != yes ]
> >
> > because the quotes ensure that the statement will be evaluated with an
> > expression to the left of the != even if the expres
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 09:09 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 04/26/2013 08:58 AM, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > Webalizer is enabled via /etc/sysconfig/webalizer but I don't understand
> > why /etc/cron.daily/00webalizer has this line:
> >
> > [ "z$WEBALIZER_CRON
Hi all,
Webalizer is enabled via /etc/sysconfig/webalizer but I don't understand
why /etc/cron.daily/00webalizer has this line:
[ "z$WEBALIZER_CRON" != "zyes" ] && exit 0
that I think it should be (and it is working this way)
[ "$WEBALIZER_CRON" != "yes" ] && exit 0
What is the mistery?
C.Sa
Hi all,
I tried to see how would be F15_x32 to F16_x64_RC4 upgrade. I expected
to fail but it would be nice for average user to see a warning, an
explanation.
He does not know why it has failed. Warn him: x32 cannot be upgraded to
x64.
All was ok on testing F16_x64_RC4 on virtual machine (qemu) a
56 matches
Mail list logo
