Re: Abrt errors while analysing gnome-shell

2014-08-25 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Sunday, August 24, 2014, 11:57:51 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > I'm getting this error repeatedly with abrt: >> --- Running report_uReport --- >> Server responded with an error: 'Validation failed: Element 'stacktrace' >> is invalid: List element is invalid: Element 'frames' is invalid: List >> elem

Re: rawhide report: 20140404 changes

2014-04-04 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Friday, April 4, 2014, 1:42:49 PM, Matthew Milleru wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:32:57AM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: >> As far as I am concerned they are very useful. In more detail I am >> looking mostly at "Broken deps" and "Summaries", with only an occasional >> peek at a changelog

Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft

2014-03-17 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Monday, March 17, 2014, 2:47:56 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mar 13, 2014, at 8:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> What does everyone think? Thanks! > Device tests: > -PATA? They aren't made anymore, do we really need to distinguish > between SATA and PATA? Is there a case where it worked on one

Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft

2014-03-17 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Monday, March 17, 2014, 12:13:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 10:25 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote: >> On Monday, March 17, 2014, 4:14:50 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >> > I can't either, and even if I did, I don't think it would justify >> > th

Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft

2014-03-17 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Monday, March 17, 2014, 4:14:50 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > I can't either, and even if I did, I don't think it would justify > the result number explosion. Storage is storage, arch is usually completely > irrelevant. > When we're at it, why do we have both i686 and x86_64 at "Device > tests"? A

Re: GMA500 vs. G3 software render

2012-05-03 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Thursday, May 3, 2012, 4:01:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 13:41 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote: >> On Thursday, May 3, 2012, 1:22:29 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote: >> > On Thu, 3 May 2012, Adam Jackson wrote: >> >> On 5/3/12 7:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrot

Re: GMA500 vs. G3 software render

2012-05-03 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Thursday, May 3, 2012, 1:22:29 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote: > On Thu, 3 May 2012, Adam Jackson wrote: >> On 5/3/12 7:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: The world is full of Adams, it appears! >>> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 13:21 +0200, Adam Pribyl wrote: While I consider the latest development on gma500,

Re: GMA500 vs. G3 software render

2012-05-03 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Thursday, May 3, 2012, 12:52:13 PM, Adam wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:05 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: >> So if we want to blacklist low performers, okay, that's a thing we can >> do I suppose. Where do we draw the line? > 'anything Atom is slow as hell' would be an obvious win, I suspect. I

Re: Move from /media to /run/media/$USER

2012-04-13 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Friday, April 13, 2012, 3:05:43 PM, Steven Stern wrote: > On 04/13/2012 12:25 PM, John Reiser wrote: >> On 04/13/2012 06:48 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >>> Release notes seem fine. Basically, removable media mounted in the >>> user's session are now mounted in a user-specific directory. >> >> T

Re: built-in DVD mediacheck is gone

2012-03-29 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012, 11:16:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 20:11 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:50:34PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 23:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > > On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 05:47 +, An

Re: dualbooting with f16beta

2011-10-13 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Thursday, October 13, 2011, 11:20:35 PM, Al wrote: > On Thursday, October 13, 2011, 9:37:13 PM, Adam wrote: >> Erm, if you're doing a live install you can just run a terminal. > Ah.For some reason, that never occurred to me. By the way, the F15 beta was the first release that I'd e

Re: dualbooting with f16beta

2011-10-13 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Thursday, October 13, 2011, 9:37:13 PM, Adam wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 20:04 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote: >> On Thursday, October 13, 2011, 2:15:20 PM, Adam wrote: >> > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 11:18 +0200, Moritz Baumann wrote: >> >> >> disk setup (all sata

Re: dualbooting with f16beta

2011-10-13 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Thursday, October 13, 2011, 2:15:20 PM, Adam wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 11:18 +0200, Moritz Baumann wrote: >> >> disk setup (all sata2/3) >> >> >> >> p1: 120GB gpt windows7 64bit (EFI) >> >> p2: 3TB gpt >> >> ( p3: 3TB (truecrypt volume) ) >> >> p4: DVD >> >> anaconda throws a >> >> "you ha

Re: Unable to install Fedora 16 beta on 32-bit machine with XP dual boot

2011-10-09 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Saturday, October 8, 2011, 9:43:34 PM, Al wrote: > If I have time this weekend, I'm going to try reinstalling F15 over the > F16 beta (so I have grub 1 dual boot again), and then retry the F16 beta > LiveCD install scenario with custom partitioning, and then the same review > and fix route

Re: Unable to install Fedora 16 beta on 32-bit machine with XP dual boot

2011-10-08 Thread Al Dunsmuir
Folks, The original attempt to install using the F16 beta failed because of a hardware error on the DVD drive. The LiveCD install appeared to proceed fine, but stalled attempting at the BIOS-related setup. I replaced the DVD drive, and tried the DVD install again. This time, I merely tur

Re: Unable to install Fedora 16 beta on 32-bit machine with XP dual boot

2011-10-07 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Friday, October 7, 2011, 4:05:11 PM, Stephen wrote: >On Oct 7, 2011 9:58 AM, "Al Dunsmuir" wrote: >> Folks, >> >> I have a 32-bit test machine (Dell GX270, 1TB SATA, 2GB RAM) running XP >> (SP3) where I had successfully installed the Fedora 15 beta

Unable to install Fedora 16 beta on 32-bit machine with XP dual boot

2011-10-07 Thread Al Dunsmuir
Folks, I have a 32-bit test machine (Dell GX270, 1TB SATA, 2GB RAM) running XP (SP3) where I had successfully installed the Fedora 15 beta last release (500 MB boot, no LVM), and continued to use (in GNOME compatibility mode, the Radeon 7500 PCI video card not being rich enough for the fu

Re: proposal: new list for updates-testing info

2011-09-28 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Wednesday, September 28, 2011, 9:23:52 PM, Tim wrote: > I think that there are things planned for bodhi, but for now I'm > generating a list of critpath packages in updates-testing sorted by > time spent in testing. > http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/testing_stats/ > Once beta is released, I'm p

Re: Draft 'install alongside Windows' test case

2011-09-01 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011, 10:27:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 20:45 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote: >> On Wednesday, August 31, 2011, 8:08:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > Hey, folks. I just threw together a quick draft of an 'install alongside >&

Re: Draft 'install alongside Windows' test case

2011-08-31 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011, 8:08:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey, folks. I just threw together a quick draft of an 'install alongside > Windows' test case - we have this as a final criterion, but no test case > for it as of yet. Here's the draft: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwi

Re: my excitement is unreachable...

2011-06-15 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011, 5:30:30 PM, Rob Healy wrote: >As much as I am anxious to play around with it, I received this >on my terminal window when I first opened it >Non-standard uts for running kernel: >release 3.0-0.rc3.git0.3.fc16.x86_64=3.0.0 gives version code 196608 >Could anyone ex

Re: New BugZapper Introduction

2011-06-10 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Friday, June 10, 2011, 12:54:49 PM, Jóhann wrote: > On 06/10/2011 04:17 PM, seth vidal wrote: >> there will not be any meat-eating related jokes in yum > Yum now 100% less bacon.. Not to mention http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFrtpT1mKy8, of course. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproj

Re: since last update system does not boot any more

2011-04-12 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Tuesday, April 5, 2011, 3:21:09 PM, Richard Ryniker wrote: >>On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 10:49 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote: >>> Indeed ... there is something simplistically elegant about: >>> >>> 3 >>> vs >>> multi-user.target >> >>Or, you could look upon it as 'utterly cryptic'. At least

Re: f-e-k improvement discussion continued

2010-07-19 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Monday, July 19, 2010, 12:45:30 PM, Adam wrote: > On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 09:02 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: >> > A shebang is one of those bits at the start of a script that looks like >> > this: >> > >> > #!/bin/bash >> > >> > which tells the system what shell the script is supposed to be run wi