This concerns a Dell Precision 5690 laptop with Intel Core Ultra7 155H
CPU and Mesa Intel Arc graphics. This laptop was bought in 2023 with
Ubuntu installed (It actually is an "Ubuntu Certified" laptop) and has
been happily running Fedora Workstation ever since until I switched
from Fedora 41 Work
On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 09:14 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 5:59 PM AV via test
> wrote:
> > I have been trying out fedora 40 beta on a Dell XPS 15 9500 with
> > integrated Intel UHD graphics and discrete Nvidia graphics.
> > Everything worked perfect
25W in small task
use.
AV
--
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 09:52 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 at 14:59, AV via test
> wrote:
> > Blocked executable in the ESP, ensure grub and shim are up to date:
> > /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/shimx64-fedora.efi Aut
ed executable in the ESP, ensure grub and shim are up to date:
/boot/efi/EFI/fedora/shimx64-fedora.efi Authenticode checksum
[0ce02100f67c7ef85f4eed368f02bf7092380a3c23ca91fd7f19430d94b00c19] is
present in dbx
AV
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.
On Sat, 2022-11-19 at 19:33 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/18/22 16:11, AV via test wrote:
> > Following info on https://getfedora.org/en/security/
> >
> > gpgv --keyring ./fedora.gpg *-CHECKSUM
> > gpgv: not a detached signature
> >
> > I think a little
Following info on https://getfedora.org/en/security/
gpgv --keyring ./fedora.gpg *-CHECKSUM
gpgv: not a detached signature
I think a little correction is warranted.
AV
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
I also forgot to lookup information about 'signals' related to
pc functioning.
Strange that you experience this randomly. Maybe fed 37 has activated
the pc speaker in a strange way
Stan demonstrates it can be turned off but unless this can be
demonstrated
to be a quirk of fe
again when pressing power button and a hard reset
is needed.
Does this warrant a blocker status and under what system component
(kernel?) should I bugzilla it.
AV
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
However as Fed 35 is
yet to make it's official debut it might be advisable to
mention in the release notes that people might encounter it.
AV
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedora
--
There are some minor quibbles but there is one very irritating
problem: very long ( > 4 minutes ) waiting times till shutdown or
restart (whatever method is used) on a bare metal install on 2
different laptops.
AV
___
test mailing list
27;Phoronix' if you do not follow the Gnome blogs or Gnome git.
AV
___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.or
27;t check signature: No public key
gpg: Signature made Fri 25 Oct 2019 03:09:48 PM CEST
gpg:using RSA key 50CB390B3C3359C4
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
curl https://getfedora.org/static/fedora.gpg | gpg --import
does not fetch
On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 14:58 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 18:21 +0200, AV wrote:
> > In https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109959
> > some people claim to have found a bug relating to eDP and
> > laptop panel version. A patch was posted
think this is, until resolved,
a blocker bug for Fed 30 final (and beta). Should I post a
bug report for Fed 30 beta.
AV
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora C
ttps://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110193
AV
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: h
assin.net/nightlies.html
>
No problems with:
Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20180316.n.1.iso
A fresh bare metal install with UEFI + Secure Boot succeeded.
AV
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
This applies to an ASUS Zenbook with Fed27 installed using
UEFI + Secure Boot (working without problems).
I downloaded
Fedora-Workstation-netinstall-x86_64-28-20180313.n.0.iso
and wanted to install it on the Zenbook (wiping Fed27) but enountered
this:
Secure Boot Violation
Invalid Signature Detec
; it works for them. Please reply to this mail or in the bug. Thanks!
After install of Final RC-1.2 on a ASUS Zenbook Pro and on a
Thinkpad T470 Cheese works perfectly with the webcams. No problems.
AV
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.f
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 02:12 +0200, AV wrote:
> With the recent updates:
>
> control-center-3.22.1-2.fc25
> gnome-session-3.22.1-2.fc25
> gnome-shell-3.22.1-2.fc25
> switcheroo-control-1.0-1.fc25
>
> Wayland seems to have 'disappeared'!
>
> It is no longe
and
echo $WAYLAND_DISPLAY
wayland-0
Something is not kosher. Is this by design or should I start
reporting bugs.
I see this on a Lenovo T550 with only Intel integrated graphics
and on a Dell Inspiron with hybrid graphics, optimus, nvidea+intel.
(and on this last laptop the
time.
From a very rudimentary bugzilla search I gather that this is a
known problem with Wayland. In regard to 'user experience' it might
be nice to have this fixed before Fed25 final.
AV
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedorap
h:
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/vgaswitcheroo/switch
And turn on/off the gpu driving the output by
# echo ON/OFF > /sys/kernel/debug/vgaswitcheroo/switch
Connect the graphics connectors with:
# echo IGD/DIS > /sys/kernel/debug/vgaswitcheroo/switch
AV
--
test mailing list
tes
23 matches
Mail list logo
