On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 14:20 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 08:18:07AM +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> >
> > This has been silent for a long time now but here's the update.
> > Debarshi and I decided to re-write the whole thing as a changeset[0].
> > We DO car
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 08:18:07AM +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> Hello
>
>
> This has been silent for a long time now but here's the update.
> Debarshi and I decided to re-write the whole thing as a changeset[0].
> We DO care about not just the rpm but also the OCI image that we ship
> with
On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 11:38 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:10 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Fedora users, developers, and friends!
> >
> > It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 39.
> >
>
> Neal Gompa asked for a popular third-party apps test day
On Tue, May 2, 2023, 16:46 Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 4:48 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
> wrote:
>
>> Debarshi and I decided to re-write the whole thing as a changeset[0].
>>
>
> Great, I think this is the best approach.
>
>
>> The revised criterion I have now stands as:
>>
>
> Does it
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 4:48 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> Debarshi and I decided to re-write the whole thing as a changeset[0].
>
Great, I think this is the best approach.
> The revised criterion I have now stands as:
>
Does it make sense to wait for the FESCo approval before we finalize the
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:10 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> Hi Fedora users, developers, and friends!
>
> It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 39.
>
Neal Gompa asked for a popular third-party apps test day recently:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedora
