Fedora-IoT-37-20220506.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64) ID: 1258449 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258449 ID: 1258462 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi URL: https

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Alright, I believe this was very useful as we fixed countless issues today. Thank you all who participated. Here is latest scratch build for the weekend testers: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86732788 And other builds can be found here: https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWri

Fedora-Rawhide-20220506.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 8 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 17/231 (x86_64), 35/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed

Fedora-36-20220506.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 8/229 (x86_64), 7/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220505.n.0): ID: 1258026 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258026 ID: 1258030 Test:

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 3:49 PM Jan Grulich wrote: > New scratch build: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86726403 > > A fixed link: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8672640

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

New scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86726403 Flatpak/Windows/MacOS builds here: https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases This should fix small dialogs with bigger fonts, broken Fedora Server downloads, uses exFAT for Windows drive restoration and fixes

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Sorry, I already opened it. Feel free to close it then. On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 2:36 PM Jan Grulich wrote: > I have a fix already for the "Fedora Server" showing "version 0". No need > to open a bug for that. > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedo

Fedora 36 compose report: 20220506.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-36-20220505.n.0 NEW: Fedora-36-20220506.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 6 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

I have a fix already for the "Fedora Server" showing "version 0". No need to open a bug for that. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://do

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

All the spins, take F35 as default value during download and not F36 beta as official editions do. On Fri, May 6, 2022, 17:58 Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > Tested on a HP Omen with Nvidia GEFORCE GTX 1650 running windows 11. All > looks good. I am able to download the workstation, write it and boo

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Tested on a HP Omen with Nvidia GEFORCE GTX 1650 running windows 11. All looks good. I am able to download the workstation, write it and boot with live iso. If the write is interrupted due to flash drive eject. It automatically re-writes. The flash drive cleanup works fine and as expected. On Fri

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 1:56 PM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > Hello, > when I want to download a Server image, it does not show anything, just a > 0. > > https://imgur.com/a/ZoOE1Y1 > Ouch, that's a bummer. Can you please create a report at https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues ? This is the fi

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Also, there is no way to download and create a Netinst image. I understand that this is a feature, probably, but there might be situations when this would come in handy. On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 1:56 PM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > Hello, > when I want to download a Server image, it does not show anythi

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Hello, when I want to download a Server image, it does not show anything, just a 0. https://imgur.com/a/ZoOE1Y1 On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 1:39 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > I tested the Windows version on Windows 10, and found FMW to be working > well, except perhaps one minor issue: > > Restoring a fla

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

I tested the Windows version on Windows 10, and found FMW to be working well, except perhaps one minor issue: Restoring a flash drive on Windows creates a FAT16 partition, which is unusable on larger drives https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/464

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 7:29 AM Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:23 PM Matthew Miller > wrote: > > Wading into this discussion pretty late... there's far too much "GNOME does > this" or "GNOME wants that" in this discussion. > > That is really not how it works, neither for GNO

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:23 PM Matthew Miller wrote: Wading into this discussion pretty late... there's far too much "GNOME does this" or "GNOME wants that" in this discussion. That is really not how it works, neither for GNOME nor for Fedora - its down to small teams and individual maintainers

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

> I tested the RPM and Flatpak version on Fedora 36 Workstation, using > Thinkpad P1 gen3 with an Intel graphics, and so far I found these issues: > > "Intel 64bit" as a hardware architecture is confusing > https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/451 Fixed. > Beta versions shouldn't be of

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220506.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220505.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220506.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 90 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 372.80 KiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

I tested the RPM and Flatpak version on Fedora 36 Workstation, using Thinkpad P1 gen3 with an Intel graphics, and so far I found these issues: "Intel 64bit" as a hardware architecture is confusing https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/451 Beta versions shouldn't be offered by default htt

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220506.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220505.0): ID: 1257491 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 9:29 AM Alex Gurenko via test < test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Generally seems to be working as expected. But here are some notes after > testing X86_64 RPM version on F36 Beta KDE spin: > - qt6-qtsvg was missing as reported already, so first screenshots didn't > h

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Update: Here is a new scratch build adding qt6-qtsvg as a dependency: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86712414 And updated Flatpak build with updated AppStream metadata to show correct version is on the same place: https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Hi, > Generally seems to be working as expected. But here are some notes after > testing X86_64 > RPM version on F36 Beta KDE spin: > - qt6-qtsvg was missing as reported already, so first screenshots didn't > have any > graphics > - Restore flash drive shows a failure, seems like the partiti

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Generally seems to be working as expected. But here are some notes after testing X86_64 RPM version on F36 Beta KDE spin: - qt6-qtsvg was missing as reported already, so first screenshots didn't have any graphics - Restore flash drive shows a failure, seems like the partition is destroyed, b

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

> On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:06 PM Kamil Paral > I tested the RPM and the Flatpak on Fedora Workstation 36 on an Intel > GPU. I flashed Fedora Kinoite 36 Beta to a USB stick using it > successfully. > > With both the RPM and the Flatpak, I noticed that it doesn't follow > the light/dark preference

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 10:11 PM Yosuke Matsumura wrote: > Tested on Fedora 36 Kinoite - Flatpak downloaded from ( > https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases/download/latest-flatpak/org.fedoraproject.MediaWriter.flatpak). > System Info (https://paste.centos.org/view/2ecf0d35) > > * After i

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Hi, can you upload images somewhere else? They cannot be opened. > Tested on Fedora 36 Kinoite - Flatpak downloaded from > (https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases/download/latest-flatpak/...). > System Info (https://paste.centos.org/view/2ecf0d35) > > * After installation of the flatpa