Fedora-36-20220504.1 compose check report

2022-05-04 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/229 (x86_64), 6/161 (aarch64) ID: 1254529 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1254529 ID: 1254564 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/t

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

2022-05-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 19:04 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 09:20:35PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > We could look at what it would take to upstream the app tests we have > > already for Fedora. What I'm afraid of is that we'd wind up finding > > some subtle difference in

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 36 Candidate RC-1.5 Available Now!

2022-05-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 23:07 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 36 Candidate RC-1.5 is now > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation > testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: > https://fedoraproject.org/

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

2022-05-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 09:20:35PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > We could look at what it would take to upstream the app tests we have > already for Fedora. What I'm afraid of is that we'd wind up finding > some subtle difference in theme or font rendering meant we'd have to > duplicate all the n

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

2022-05-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 05:14:53PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > but these bugs weren't discovered at that time. This is likely because > of your idea 2: "basic functionality" is a bit up for debate. You can > take an extremely minimalist approach to this (run the app, click a > couple of buttons

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

2022-05-04 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 02:46:16PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > > popularity and reviews noting how polished everything is makes us very much > > want to build on that. So I understand why this is here, including the > > expanded "all installed applications" Workstation criteria. > As Adam already n

Fedora-Rawhide-20220504.n.0 compose check report

2022-05-04 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 10/231 (x86_64), 21/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220503.n.0): ID: 1253787 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso de

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

2022-05-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 10:27 +0100, Allan Day wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > ... > > Do GNOME users actually use Contacts and Calendar and Photos? I mean, > > I'm kind of a GNOME ultra, and I don't. > ... > > One of the reasons we need metrics is so we can answer these questions > using actual

Fedora 34 updates-testing report

2022-05-04 Thread updates
The following Fedora 34 Security updates need testing: Age URL 61 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6aba96e1b8 radare2-5.6.4-1.fc34 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-fef374d46f zchunk-1.2.2-1.fc34 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220504.n.0 changes

2022-05-04 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220503.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220504.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 125 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 140 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 49.37 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

2022-05-04 Thread Kamil Paral
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 11:35 AM Allan Day wrote: > That said, my own personal sense is that Calendar is used to some > extent, and Contacts and Photos are used much less. That is somewhat > reflected in the app reviews: > > Firefox - 7236 reviews, 3.4 average rating > gedit - 896 reviews, 4.0 ave

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

2022-05-04 Thread Kamil Paral
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 2:15 AM Adam Williamson wrote: > > 1. I know we have had GNOME Test days, but this > >stuff didn't come up. Presumably, it would have if someone had > happened > >to look at GNOME Photos. Can we formally go through > >https://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testca

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

2022-05-04 Thread Kamil Paral
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:13 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > Time to talk about > > https://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Final_Release_Criteria#Default_application_functionality > again! > > Lots of desktop-app-related blockers this time around, and last time too. I > think we're hitting a s

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220504.0 compose check report

2022-05-04 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220502.0): ID: 1253708 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1253708 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)

Fedora-36-20220504.0 compose check report

2022-05-04 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/229 (x86_64), 6/161 (aarch64) ID: 1253312 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1253312 ID: 1253347 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/t