Fedora-Rawhide-20220217.n.1 compose check report

2022-02-17 Thread Fedora compose checker
(same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220217.n.0): ID: 1134484 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1134484 ID: 1134728 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1134728

Fedora-36-20220217.n.1 compose check report

2022-02-17 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 14/229 (x86_64), 17/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220216.n.0): ID: 1133953 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1133953 ID: 1133974 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220217.n.1 changes

2022-02-17 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220217.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220217.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:7 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 6 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 118 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 10.59 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Fedora 36 compose report: 20220217.n.1 changes

2022-02-17 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-36-20220216.n.0 NEW: Fedora-36-20220217.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:16 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 13 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 187 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 32.21 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Fedora-Rawhide-20220217.n.0 compose check report

2022-02-17 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 106/231 (x86_64), 64/161 (aarch64) New failures

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220217.0 compose check report

2022-02-17 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64), 1/8 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220216.0): ID: 1133009 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: http

Fedora-Cloud-35-20220217.0 compose check report

2022-02-17 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220216.0): ID: 1133606 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1133606 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests

Fedora-IoT-37-20220217.1 compose check report

2022-02-17 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64), 3/16 (x86_64) ID: 1133200 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1133200 ID: 1133260 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://

Re: F36 Beta blocker status summary

2022-02-17 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 3:27 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > Now that we've reached the branch point, it's time to start doing > weekly blocker summaries again! Beta freeze begins on 22 February and > the current target Beta release date is 15 March. > > Action summary > > > Accepted

Re: F36 Beta blocker status summary

2022-02-17 Thread Ben Cotton
As a reminder: Beta freeze begins on 22 February and the current target Beta release date is 15 March. Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. anaconda — When running anaconda on Wayland with two keyboard layouts configured, hitting any modifier key with the se

Re: new criterion proposal: Graphical package managers (take #2)

2022-02-17 Thread Kamil Paral
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:57 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > >> Thanks Kamil! So the next step would be to draft test cases for the >> additional blocking functionality. Do we have a plan for that? >> > > I can suggest something as I would like to convert it into OpenQA later, so > I might hit two tar

Re: new criterion proposal: Graphical package managers (take #2)

2022-02-17 Thread Lukas Ruzicka
> Thanks Kamil! So the next step would be to draft test cases for the > additional blocking functionality. Do we have a plan for that? > I can suggest something as I would like to convert it into OpenQA later, so I might hit two targets with one arrow. Luk > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA >