g-i-s works again with this compose :)
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 4:28 AM Fedora compose checker <
rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Xfce raw-xz armhfp
>
> Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
> 8 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing
> openQA tests ma
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
8 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MI
Missing expected images:
Workstation live x86_64
Xfce live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 4/21 (x86_64)
ID: 987829 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/987829
ID: 987830 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. mesa — gnome-shell: cogl_texture_get_gl_texture(): gnome-shell
killed by SIGSEGV — NEW
ACTION: Maintainers to diagnose and fix issue
NEEDINFO: karolherbst
2. freeipa — DNS often stops resolving properly after FreeIPA serve
On Fri, 2021-09-17 at 09:34 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 7:17 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2021-08-25 at 11:33 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:03 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > > Or if we want to have some exact numbers, what about "it m
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210916.0):
ID: 987759 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/987759
ID: 987770 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 17/205 (x86_64), 13/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210916.n.0):
ID: 987184 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/987184
ID: 987190 Test
OLD: Fedora-35-20210916.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20210917.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 55
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 8.69 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On 9/17/21 07:29, Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
What if we replaced the "10 seconds" with something like "reasonably fast".
With different machines people could have different expectations, so
somebody could consider 10 seconds a long time, while others could take 20
for normal.
This could make more roo
What if we replaced the "10 seconds" with something like "reasonably fast".
With different machines people could have different expectations, so
somebody could consider 10 seconds a long time, while others could take 20
for normal.
This could make more room for usual experience and expectations.
O
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 3:35 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> But I also missed his announcement, and when this discussion was renewed, I
> thought the criterion still wasn't finalized and in effect. It seems I wasn't
> the only one :o)
>
I also forgot that I had done it when the discussion picked back
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210916.0):
ID: 986856 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210916.0):
ID: 986548 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 7:17 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-08-25 at 11:33 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:03 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > Or if we want to have some exact numbers, what about "it must not add
> more than 10 seconds to a regular system boot speed"
14 matches
Mail list logo
