://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=Rawhide&build=Fedora-Rawhide-20210712.n.0&groupid=1
(adamw, 15:17:22)
* Rawhide was working fine until the middle of last week, recent
composes have big problems, most images fail to boot and Cloud
images fa
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
26 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 65/138 (aarch64), 105/199 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not faile
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210711.0):
ID: 926000 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/926000
ID: 926016 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-i
Hello!
Will attend today too and has started running Kernel 5.13 tests
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 12:56 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2021-07-12
> # Time: 15:00 UTC
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> # Location: #fedora-meeting o
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 01:11:42 -0600
Chris Murphy wrote:
> You might ask in #fedora-kernel but my two cents is I generally don't
> file bugs on rawhide kernels in the RHBZ. Instead I try to figure out
> what part of the kernels is blowing up, and use a current version of
> the MAINTAINERS file [1]
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210711.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210712.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 40
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 15.72 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 8:24 PM stan via kernel
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 06:38:08 -0700
> stan via kernel wrote:
>
> > I have an install of rawhide. It is updated to latest packages in
> > rawhide. One of those packages is the new 5.14 kernel. It mostly
> > works, but I have seen three fr