On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 01:25:50AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> I had an idea and if instead of calling it stable, we call it RC1
> (release candidate 1) and only after adding all the updates in the base
> version and (re) testing, we finally call it Fedora 34 stable ?
Yeah, we could add a few
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 7:05 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-05-05 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
>
There are no nominated bugs and 1 previously accepted bug to be disc
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 15/193 (x86_64), 9/123 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in F
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210503.n.2
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210504.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 19
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.17 GiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210503.0):
ID: 877801 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210502.0):
ID: 877816 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/877816
ID: 877819 Test: x86_64 IoT-d
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210503.0):
ID: 877461 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
