Fedora Linux 34 Cloud Test Day 2021-04-16 through 2021-04-19

Hey All, We are running a Fedora Linux 34 Cloud Test Day from Friday, April 16 through Monday, April 19. As a part of this test day[0] we will be testing the Fedora Cloud Images. You can test the regular base image using testcloud or if you have an Amazon account, you can test the AMIs listed on t

Re: [Suggestion] Add `noatime` mount option

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:37 PM TheEvilSkeleton wrote: > > I'd like to suggest to use noatime mount option for btrfs. > > I've come across two posts about combining atime with btrfs. Unfortunately > those two should not be combined, as explained here: > https://lwn.net/Articles/499293/; and her

[Suggestion] Add `noatime` mount option

I'd like to suggest to use *noatime* mount option for btrfs. I've come across two posts about combining atime with btrfs. Unfortunately those two should not be combined, as explained here: ; and here: Why I experience poor performance during file access on fil

Re: Basic criterion proposal: g-i-s shouldn't take 2 minutes to launch

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 1:13 PM Brandon Nielsen wrote: > > On 4/13/21 9:39 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: > [Snip] > > > >> There must be no SELinux denial notifications or crash notifications on > >> boot of or during installation from a release-blocking live image, or at > >> first login after a defaul

F34, pipewire and orca (screen reader)

Hi folks! Sending to test@ and desktop@, and CCing two folks who reported problems. So I finally got some time today to look into the reports of screen reader functionality not working well in F34, with GNOME 40 and Pipewire. I wrote the latest F34 nightly live to a USB stick, booted it on my test

Re: Basic criterion proposal: g-i-s shouldn't take 2 minutes to launch

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 02:13:31PM -0500, Brandon Nielsen wrote: > Does that make this[0] a blocker candidate? > [0] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943683 Looks like it to me. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ test mailing li

Re: Basic criterion proposal: g-i-s shouldn't take 2 minutes to launch

On 4/14/21 2:13 PM, Brandon Nielsen wrote: [Snip] > Somewhat related, is there some mapping of compose test cases to release > criterion? Or the inverse? Something like "Failures of test case foo, > bar, and baz may constitute a violation of release criterion qux"? > [Snip] Nevermind, I see they'

Re: Basic criterion proposal: g-i-s shouldn't take 2 minutes to launch

On 4/13/21 9:39 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: [Snip] There must be no SELinux denial notifications or crash notifications on boot of or during installation from a release-blocking live image, or at first login after a default install of a release-blocking desktop. Of course, we can always adjust th

Re: [Proposal] The dual monitor set-up criterion (Is "dual head" redrafted)

Lukas Ruzicka composed on 2021-04-14 18:02 (UTC+0200): > *On computers with a possibility to connect an external monitor (e.g. two > monitors on a desktop and one external monitor on a laptop)... > "Desktop" to me imp

Fedora-34-20210414.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Xfce raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 8/127 (aarch64), 10/189 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210413.n.0): ID: 856266 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/

Re: [Proposal] The dual monitor set-up criterion (Is "dual head" redrafted)

I like it! Geoff Marr IRC: coremodule On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:09 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > Hello friends of Fedora, > > I would like to thank you for your reactions to the first draft of the > dual monitor criterion. There were lots of remarks and suggestions, and I > would like to present

Re: Call for interviews for user research on QA landing page

Hello Linda, I can also try to help. It depends what you need to know :D Lukas On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 4:45 PM Linda Okorie wrote: > Hello everyone, > I am currently working with the Fedora QA landing page project that is > attempting to deal with the frustrations of contributing and onboarding

[Proposal] The dual monitor set-up criterion (Is "dual head" redrafted)

Hello friends of Fedora, I would like to thank you for your reactions to the first draft of the dual monitor criterion. There were lots of remarks and suggestions, and I would like to present the second draft of the criterion. I have really tried to formulate it on a rather permissive basis *The

Re: Call for interviews for user research on QA landing page

Hello! I have time to help on Friday, Saturday and Sunday this week On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 5:10 PM Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:15 PM Linda Okorie > wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> I am currently working with the Fedora QA landing page project that is >> attempting

Fedora-Rawhide-20210414.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 8/189 (x86_64), 7/127 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210413.n.0): ID: 855800 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://open

Re: Call for interviews for user research on QA landing page

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:15 PM Linda Okorie wrote: > Hello everyone, > I am currently working with the Fedora QA landing page project that is > attempting to deal with the frustrations of contributing and onboarding new > contributors to Fedora projects. > I really need your input to help improv

Fedora-IoT-34-20210414.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210413.0): ID: 856508 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/856508 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests complet

Call for interviews for user research on QA landing page

Hello everyone, I am currently working with the Fedora QA landing page project that is attempting to deal with the frustrations of contributing and onboarding new contributors to Fedora projects. I really need your input to help improve the process for everyone. I would love to chat with anyone ava

Re: F33 -> F34 upgrade resulted in unbootable system

It does seem to have been the dracut issue. I wasn't able to get the boot menu up for some reason, either with holding shift, or mashing escape. For anyone else running into the same issue, this is how I fixed it 1) boot off of live cd, I used the fedora 34 disk 2) connect to wifi 3) use gnome d

Re: F33 -> F34 upgrade resulted in unbootable system

Hi, On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 9:42 AM Jeb Wilkins wrote: [snip] > [ OK ] Reached target: Local encrypted volumes > [ <=> ] A start job is running for /dev/mapper/. (Xmin Ys / no limit) > This seems like the issue this dracut update resolves: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-202

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210414.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-34-20210413.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210414.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

F33 -> F34 upgrade resulted in unbootable system

>> Repost from users@ since I was advised this is the correct place I thought I'd test the F34 upgrade to look for bugs but its resulted in an non-booting laptop. I've a fairly stock Fedora install on a Dell XPS 13 developer edition. The latop was originally an ubuntu install, its got LVM on to

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210414.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210413.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210414.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 28 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 62 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 43.70 MiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210414.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210413.0): ID: 855750 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210414.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210413.0): ID: 855577 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://op