I now have Fedora 34 WS Beta installed on my secondary NVMe. The only
thing I can see to comment about is
that during the installation of the bootloader, that Anaconda kicked me
back to the menu you first get when you are asked
if you want to try Fedora or to Install. I am not sure if this
On Sun, 2021-03-28 at 21:54 -0500, David wrote:
> Never mind. I am retarded.
We all make mistakes :-)
--
u9000 (Nine)
They, Them, Theirs
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
On Mon, 2021-03-29 at 09:48 +0800, Robbi Nespu wrote:
> It nothing wrong of using pseudo name, unless you do something break the
> rule and law (eventually, the people with real name also did break the
> law and rules nowadays)shrug
>
> I see it as TheEvilSkeleton come to contribute and "bre
Never mind. I am retarded.
I forgot to put the iso of 34 on the thumbdrive, and accidently used my old
Rawhide iso.
David Locklear
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
I just did an install on my secondary NVMe of Fedora 34 using the March 26
nightly of Workstation Live.
I have done about 50 such installs in the last four years, but this was my
first with wi-fi.
I was not able to change the time to AM/PM in that part of the installer.
However, somewhere and so
It nothing wrong of using pseudo name, unless you do something break the
rule and law (eventually, the people with real name also did break the
law and rules nowadays)shrug
I see it as TheEvilSkeleton come to contribute and "break" the software
as QA test.
I am curious guy, so I did some
Hi,
Leaving aside the question of using a real name...
It is much easier to take people seriously if they have a more
sensible,
even if boring, name. The names you suggested might be fine in your
existing situation, but imply (probably incorrectly) a lack of
maturity,
and some people would a
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:37:56 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 29/03/2021 03:03, stan via test wrote:
> > This. There is a command that the user can run after the update,
> > and it will find all of these and present them to the user with a
> > little mini menu with single letter commands
>
> The
On 29/03/2021 03:03, stan via test wrote:
This. There is a command that the user can run after the update, and
it will find all of these and present them to the user with a little
mini menu with single letter commands
The command you reference is rpmconf.
--
Remind me to ignore comments which
On 29/03/2021 02:24, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 12:15:13 -0400, TheEvilSkeleton wrote:
My alias is TheEvilSkeleton, but you can also call me Tesk,
TheEvilSkely, Skelly, Proprietary Chrome-chan or anything close to it.
May I ask for your real name?
Where does this come from th
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 17:56:08 -0400
Richard Ryniker wrote:
> > From David, not quoted:
> > Upgrading: grub2-efi-x64-1:2.06~rc1-3.fc35.x86_64
> >159/498 warning:
> > /boot/grub2/grubenv created as /boot/grub2/grubenv.rpmnew
> >
> > Upg
On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 15:24:38 +0200
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 12:15:13 -0400, TheEvilSkeleton wrote:
>
> > My alias is TheEvilSkeleton, but you can also call me Tesk,
> > TheEvilSkely, Skelly, Proprietary Chrome-chan or anything close to
> > it.
>
> May I ask for your rea
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 12:15:13 -0400
TheEvilSkeleton wrote:
> Hello everyone!
> I try my best to learn as much
> as I can so I can contribute back what I've learned. I mostly
> contribute to documentation, since it's one of the places where free
> and open source software (FOSS) falls behind, but
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210327.0):
ID: 833822 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833822
ID: 833837 Test: aarch64
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 03:24:38PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Where does this come from that people introduce themselves with
> pseudonyms, aliases, usernames but no real name?
If anything, I think it's a lot less common than it used to be.
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 12:15:13PM -0400, TheEvilSkeleton wrote:
> as I can so I can contribute back what I've learned. I mostly
> contribute to documentation, since it's one of the places where free
> and open source software (FOSS) falls behind, but also because it's
> where I am very good at. I
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/127 (aarch64), 6/189 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210327.n.0):
ID: 833519 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833519
ID: 833579 Test: aarch
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 11/189 (x86_64), 16/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210327.n.1):
ID: 833173 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@u
On 3/28/21 11:30, David wrote:
I just installed Shotwell on a Rawhide WS install.
I assume the first mirror it tried to contact ( twice ? ), and then went to
look in a different mirror ??
Here is a partial readout:
Downloading Packages:
[MIRROR] shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64.rpm: Status code
I just installed Shotwell on a Rawhide WS install.
I assume the first mirror it tried to contact ( twice ? ), and then went to
look in a different mirror ??
Here is a partial readout:
Downloading Packages:
[MIRROR] shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64.rpm: Status code: 404 for
https://mirror.genesisada
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 7/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210326.0):
ID: 833733 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833733
ID: 833734
OLD: Fedora-34-20210327.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210328.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 63
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.04 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 12:15:13 -0400, TheEvilSkeleton wrote:
> My alias is TheEvilSkeleton, but you can also call me Tesk,
> TheEvilSkely, Skelly, Proprietary Chrome-chan or anything close to it.
May I ask for your real name?
Where does this come from that people introduce themselves with
pseudo
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210327.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210328.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 23
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 229.93 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210327.0):
ID: 833071 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210327.0):
ID: 833060 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833060
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64),
26 matches
Mail list logo
