No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210227.0):
ID: 793314 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
The following Fedora 32 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
21 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4c8458e373
containernetworking-plugins-0.9.1-1.fc32
18 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b61fc0e1b7
linux-firmware-20210208-117.fc32
17 https://bo
hi guys
I'm very glad to join a fedora QA team,
I'm new to fedora project but I'm very interested in learning and contribuiting
as best i can.
I apologyse if i don't write/understand wery well english, but it's my
intention do the best.
So, let me introduce myself
My name is Valerio Andrea, im
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210226.0):
ID: 793183 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/793183
ID: 793192 Test: aarch64
I noticed that the QA Basic test case for reboot unmount has apparently
been removed. Is this no longer necessary with btrfs?
Have a Great Day!
Pat (tablepc)
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe se
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 14/187 (x86_64), 27/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 17/187 (x86_64), 21/126 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210226.n.0):
ID: 792788 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/792788
ID: 792878 Test: aarch64 Se
On 2/26/21 14:53, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
On 2/25/21 15:24, Chris Murphy wrote:
An alternative is 'btrfs scrub start -BdR' which will not background
the scrub, and will give a detailed report upon completion.
Well I think tried all the combinations of scrub status with and without
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210226.0):
ID: 793076 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/793076
ID: 7930
OLD: Fedora-34-20210226.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210227.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210226.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210227.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 43
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210226.0):
ID: 792418 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
12 matches
Mail list logo