No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210104.0):
ID: 751715 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 11:30 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 02:40:58PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > To: "...must be able to use HTTP(S) repositories as package sources..."
>
> Let's drop the (S) and make it just HTTPS. With the parenthesis, I'm unclear
> if it means "http o
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201226.0):
ID: 751283 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/751283
Old failures (same test failed in Fedo
Buona sera Alessio, and thank you for the sponsoring.
I've already performed the 5.10 kernel test, and I'll have a look to the other
links you mentioned.
See you,
Emmanuel.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 14:29 +, Emmanuel Rousseau wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> My name is Emmanuel Rousseau.
Hello Emmanuel, I just sponsored you in the QA team.
As you know, this week is devoted to testing the Kernel 5.10 [0].
This list will get updates on different testing related activ
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 02:40:58PM +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> To: "...must be able to use HTTP(S) repositories as package sources..."
Let's drop the (S) and make it just HTTPS. With the parenthesis, I'm unclear
if it means "http or https, whichever works" or "both http and https". And
in 2021+, i
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 9/180 (x86_64), 7/122 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fe
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 6/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210102.0):
ID: 751234 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/751234
ID: 75
Hello everybody,
My name is Emmanuel Rousseau. I'm a 47 year-old french-speaking man living in
Belgium. My first contact with linux was more than 20 years ago at university
when I was a PhD student in biomedical science. At that time, I used linux on
Debian or Red Hat distros mainly for data an
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210103.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210104.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 67
Added packages: 30
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 95
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.70 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
This has been already discussed before [1], but the discussion died down.
Here's an updated proposal.
Change the following:
1.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria#Remote_package_sources
From: "When using a release-blocking dedicated installer image, the
installer must be able to
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 12:54 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
> I understand. What I'm saying is that I think that an old version of a
> non-essential package was made part of the compose so their would be
> something to update in the case of someone running the test on the day
> the compose was n
On 1/4/21 03:06, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 2:58 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
While running tests on Fedora 34 Rawhide 20210102.n.0
When running test case QA:Testcase base update cli, it used to be that
there was a single file (something not essential as I recall) that wo
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210103.0):
ID: 750432 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 2:58 PM pmkel...@frontier.com
wrote:
> First!... Happy New Year Everyone. I hope you all had Great holidays.
>
> While running tests on Fedora 34 Rawhide 20210102.n.0, I saw a problem
> that has been present for about a year now. If it's considered a but, I
> am at a loss t
15 matches
Mail list logo
