No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201204.0):
ID: 735940 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA Meeting
==
Meeting started by adamw at 16:01:37 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2020-11-30/fedora-qa.2020-11-30-16.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
I have been in on-again, off-again pursuit for several months of an
issue with something deep inside gnome-control-center's printer dialogs,
but I can't come up with a reliable way to reproduce.
Long story short sometimes it dumps core when closing a dialog, or
gnome-control-center itself.
I
Hey folks! Just a heads up that I merged a branch I've had lying around
for weeks that enables *some* of the openQA desktop tests on the
aarch64 Workstation image.
I left out some with known issues. desktop_notifications_postinstall
needs to boot to runlevel 3, which is actually a bit tricky becau
For anyone who's not subscribed to devel@: it seems we're going ahead
with getting an official Fedora Matrix homeserver. Given the generally
positive/interested vibe in the last meeting, once this is up and
running I'm going to propose we have a QA room there, bridged to
#fedora-qa on Freenode, and
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 6/15 (aarch64), 3/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201203.0):
ID: 735852 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/73
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201203.0):
ID: 735790 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/735790
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests complet
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 14/180 (x86_64), 23/117 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201203.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201204.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 44
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 73.13 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201202.0):
ID: 735415 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 20:42, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 19:48 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > > > I think if we don't want to accept a different
> > > > philosophy about release schedule and release engineering we can
> > just
> > > close
> > > > that Change proposal.
> > >
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 20:32, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 19:48 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
> [big snip]
>
> > To the outside
> > > world, there is a strong impression that the thing called "Fedora" is a
> > > product or set of products with a release number that gets releas
12 matches
Mail list logo
