No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201202.0):
ID: 734329 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/37 (x86_64)
ID: 734252 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/734252
ID: 734254 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/734254
ID: 734255
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 12:15:21PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> with quite a lot of consequences. It has consequences, for instance,
> for our most important forms of communication to the wider world: how
> do we pivot from this simple story that "Fedora is a (set of)
> product(s) that come(s) o
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 11/180 (x86_64), 19/117 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 19:42 +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> >
> > CoreOS is going to be the same only worse, because it's not even built
> > the same way as the rest of Fedora. It's not built by Pungi, we don't
> > get the same messages published when CoreOS builds happen (we don't get
> > messages
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 1:47 PM Clement Verna wrote:
>
> So what defines an Edition ? I think if we don't want to accept a different
> philosophy about release schedule and release engineering we can just close
> that Change proposal.
>
From https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Editions:
> Fedora Edit
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64), 2/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201130.0):
ID: 734201 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/734201
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 18:27, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 09:23 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > == How To Test ==
> > See QA test cases :
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:CoreOS_Test_Cases
> >
> > We also have regular tests days, for example
> > https://fedoramagazine.
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201201.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201202.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 5
Added packages: 8
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 164
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.64 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 12:19 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 09:23 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > == How To Test ==
> > See QA test cases :
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:CoreOS_Test_Cases
> >
> > We also have regular tests days, for example
> > https://fedorama
On Wed, 2020-12-02 at 09:23 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> == How To Test ==
> See QA test cases : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:CoreOS_Test_Cases
>
> We also have regular tests days, for example
> https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-coreos-test-day/
So...yeah, that's not really enough to
Oh, sorry. I saw that email and forgot about it.
It's alright. I'll save the bugs for January, maybe an update fixes them
in the meantime :-)
Cheers,
Silvia
FAS: Lailah
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 20:13, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-12-01 at 19:35 +0100, Silvia Sánchez wrote:
> > Next
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201201.0):
ID: 733708 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
13 matches
Mail list logo
