Re: desktop spins, btrfs copy test request

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 9:38 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm looking for testers: > - Fedora 33 > - User home is on Btrfs (clean installed or converted, in a subvolume > or not, these details won't matter) > - using any spin other than Workstation (kde, lxqt, xfce, etc are all > requested).

Re: desktop spins, btrfs copy test request

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 7:38 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > Note 2: It's decently likely you will get the expected results if > /home is on XFS. Arguably if we get a result on Btrfs indicating I got distracted, and didn't finish the thought before clicking send! If the result on Btrfs and XFS differ

desktop spins, btrfs copy test request

Hi, I'm looking for testers: - Fedora 33 - User home is on Btrfs (clean installed or converted, in a subvolume or not, these details won't matter) - using any spin other than Workstation (kde, lxqt, xfce, etc are all requested). I'd like to know which desktops do/don't automagically support reflin

some Rawhide feedback

After the update today, I no longer have to do the "enforcing=0" maneuver. However, I now no longer get the login-screen, and instead go straight to gnome with a dialogue to authenticate. I have Rawhide on the motherboard's primary NVMe and Fedora 33 Beta on the secondary NVMe. Both updated

Fedora-33-20201013.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 6/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201012.n.0): ID: 693350 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/693350 ID: 693357 Test: x86_64 universal suppo

Fedora-IoT-33-20201013.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201011.0): ID: 693435 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/te

Fedora 33 compose report: 20201013.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-33-20201012.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20201013.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 6 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Fedora-IoT-34-20201013.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201012.0): ID: 693223 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/693223 ID: 693420 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_de

Fedora-Rawhide-20201013.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 95/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201013.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201012.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201013.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 148 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 108.96 MiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora-Cloud-31-20201013.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj

Fedora-Cloud-32-20201013.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201012.0): ID: 692728 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj