Fedora-IoT-33-20201011.0 compose check report

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201008.0): ID: 690590 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/te

amdgpu DDX: (EE) AIGLX error: dlopen of /usr/lib64/dri/swrast_dri.so failed

2020-10-10 Thread Felix Miata
Is X crashing for everyone because of $SUBJECT? My search foo turned up nothing on Bugzilla. How can I find out why the lib is missing? X works fine using modesetting DDX instead of amdgpu DDX. # inxi -SMGIay System: Host: ara88 Kernel: 5.8.14-300.fc33.x86_64 x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 2

Fedora-33-20201010.n.0 compose check report

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201009.n.0): ID: 690472 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/690472 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-33-20201009.n.0):

Fedora 33 compose report: 20201010.n.0 changes

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-33-20201009.n.0 NEW: Fedora-33-20201010.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 3 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: some vague Rawhide feedback

2020-10-10 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 10/10/20 2:43 PM, David wrote: I still have the super-annoying gdm / selinux thing. I do not yet know how to do the "enforcing=0 thing," but I will try to learn that this week.    I may have done it once before, but I forgot. When you get the menu listing the available kernel options to

some vague Rawhide feedback

2020-10-10 Thread David
Today's Rawhide update went smoothly for me. ( Xorg, kernel, etc. ).Goodbye and so long and hasta la vista, to kernel rc7. My kernel, and also the two back-up kernels, are iterations of rc8. I still have the super-annoying gdm / selinux thing. I do not yet know how to do the "enforcing=0 t

Fedora 33 updates-testing report

2020-10-10 Thread updates
The following Fedora 33 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5 createrepo_c-0.16.1-1.fc33 dnf-4.4.0-1.fc33 dnf-plugins-core-4.0.18-1.fc33 dnf-plugins-extras-4.0.12-1.fc33 libdnf-0.54.2-1.fc33 librepo-1.12.1-1.fc33 0 http

Re: Unable to boot on Raspberry Pi 4B

2020-10-10 Thread Peter Robinson
> I am trying to boot Fedora IoT aarch64 images on my Raspberry Pi 4B but > failing to do so as I see an error that EFI was unable to load the image. I > have tried using the raw images of the current 32 IoT and 33 Pre-release IoT. > Please tell me where I am going wrong. As per the IoT referen

Re: Unable to boot on Raspberry Pi 4B

2020-10-10 Thread Peter Robinson
> Thanks for your response. Note, however, that this info is "as of" almost a > year ago. Has any progress been made since then? As the maintainer of these devices in Fedora I can clearly state they are still unsupported. I do this in my own time, I don't have time to do kernel development nor do

Re: Unable to boot on Raspberry Pi 4B

2020-10-10 Thread Steven A. Falco
I have F32 running on a Pi 4B. The way I did it was to first install Fedora-Minimal, then add the KDE desktop once I had the minimal OS working. I was not able to directly install Fedora-KDE - it would hang at some point during the installation. This issue may have been fixed since I did my

Fedora-IoT-32-20201010.0 compose check report

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200925.0): ID: 690390 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/te

Fedora-Rawhide-20201010.n.0 compose check report

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 43 required tests failed, 8 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 23/181 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201010.n.0 changes

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201009.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201010.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 91 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 399.75 KiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora-Cloud-31-20201010.0 compose check report

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj

Fedora-Cloud-32-20201010.0 compose check report

2020-10-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201007.0): ID: 690057 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj