The Go/No-Go meeting is Thursday!
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. libreport — abrt-server errors when processing zstd compressed core
dumps produced by systemd-246~rc1-1.fc33 — POST
ACTION: msuchy to get retrace server back in service
2. sddm — login st
LGTM, thanks for putting it together Adam!
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, 20:54 Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 12:17 AM Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 14:31 -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > The Fedora Council is work
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20200903.0):
ID: 655569 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/655569
ID: 655575 Test: x86_64 IoT-
On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 12:17 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 14:31 -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Fedora Council is working to update the Team Directory in the
> council-docs
> > project. Part of that is reviewing the teams we have documented and if
> the
> >
On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 11:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 12:12 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:57 pm, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > Overall I find the criterion reasonable and useful and I'm +1 to
> > > incorporating it. Its current phrasing seems
On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 14:31 -0400, David Cantrell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Fedora Council is working to update the Team Directory in the council-docs
> project. Part of that is reviewing the teams we have documented and if the
> information is correct.
>
> The Fedora QA Team is currently listed here
Hi,
The Fedora Council is working to update the Team Directory in the council-docs
project. Part of that is reviewing the teams we have documented and if the
information is correct.
The Fedora QA Team is currently listed here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/engineering/
We are askin
On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 12:12 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:57 pm, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Overall I find the criterion reasonable and useful and I'm +1 to
> > incorporating it. Its current phrasing seems fine to me.
>
> So how does the process of adding the new criter
Hey,
I'm Pruthvi, a Linux enthusiast :P.
Past 2 years I have been closely involved with Linux and Open Source
and my short but sweet work experience with open source and RedHat products
has brought me here.
I feel my keen interest in Cloud technology, DevOps, and Open source and
ability
to adapt
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 9/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200903.n.0):
ID: 655448 Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/655448
ID: 655510 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https:
OLD: Fedora-33-20200903.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200904.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 11/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200902.n.1):
ID:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200902.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200904.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 8
Added packages: 23
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 295
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.51 GiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200903.0):
ID: 654635 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
On Thu, 2020-09-03 at 13:37 -0400, Luke Hollins wrote:
> Hi I'm applying to this group mostly to do the test day and fix
Hello Luke,
I have sponsored you in the QA group.
We are currently testing the F33 BTRFS, as btrfs will be the default
for all WS. You can currently help us with [0]
Otherwi
16 matches
Mail list logo
