Hello everyone,
My name is Anchal Agarwal. I am RHCSA Certified and using RedHat Linux from
more than one year. I have deep interest in DevOps and Cloud domain.
I am very glad to join Fedora QA team and it's time to contribute at fedora
project.
At my signature I'm sending my contacts fell fr
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:02 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> On 2020-08-27 06:28, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>> We are considering bumping the default size for swaponzram. So (b) is
> >>> helpful to see if there are any negative side effects long term. I
> >>> never saw any, but I am not a sufficient sample
On 2020-08-27 06:28, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> We are considering bumping the default size for swaponzram. So (b) is
>>> helpful to see if there are any negative side effects long term. I
>>> never saw any, but I am not a sufficient sample size.
>>>
>>> Once the installation is finished, you can cop
On 2020-08-27 06:28, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 4:00 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2020-08-27 01:13, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 7:55 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
I performed the above after assigning 1248mb and the install completed
fine.
>>> (a) create a s
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 4:00 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> On 2020-08-27 01:13, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 7:55 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> I performed the above after assigning 1248mb and the install completed
> >> fine.
> > (a) create a swap partition in Custom partitioning
> > (
On 2020-08-27 01:13, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 7:55 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
>> I performed the above after assigning 1248mb and the install completed fine.
> (a) create a swap partition in Custom partitioning
> (b) create a custom /etc/systemd/zram-generator.conf file that uses
>
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 08:39 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 8/25/20 8:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > So the 'official' doc on this, AFAIK, is
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/rawhide/release-notes/welcome/Hardware_Overview/
> > which still cites 1GB as the minimum for "the defau
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 7:55 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> I performed the above after assigning 1248mb and the install completed fine.
(a) create a swap partition in Custom partitioning
(b) create a custom /etc/systemd/zram-generator.conf file that uses
zram-fraction=1.0, and restart the zram swap se
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:15 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:12 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 4:40 AM Alessio wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello.
> > > I was performing some random test of F33.
> > > There is a thing that I can't understand.
> > > If I reinsta
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 4:15 PM Richard Ryniker wrote:
> However, it is unsatisfactory for installation to fail without some
> explanation of what may be wrong. Cannot anaconda attempt to verify the
> installation environment provides at least the recommended memory
> resources to install Fedora
On 8/25/20 8:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
So the 'official' doc on this, AFAIK, is
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/rawhide/release-notes/welcome/Hardware_Overview/
which still cites 1GB as the minimum for "the default installation"
(which is of course a fairly vague term).
1GB has
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 4:25 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> I'd accept the criterion as proposed (because we need it now), and do the
> reorganization later (possibly when this cycle is over and we have more
> time to bikeshed about best criterion layout). I'm fine with either adding
> to the existing c
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 12/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200825.n.1):
ID: 648652 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/648652
ID: 648688 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_os
OLD: Fedora-33-20200825.n.1
NEW: Fedora-33-20200826.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 5
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:7
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:2.47 MiB
Size of
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200825.0):
ID: 648493 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 4:06 AM Ed Greshko wrote:
> My suggestion would be that if the install process could detect/know that
> it is below the limits
> needed it would notify the user and not proceed. That is, not just crash.
>
Knowing memory requirements in advance for an ever-changing codeba
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200824.0):
ID: 648247 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.or
18 matches
Mail list logo
