Fedora-Cloud-30-20200514.0 compose check report

2020-05-13 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj

Fedora-IoT-33-20200513.0 compose check report

2020-05-13 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: Used mem changed from 169 MiB to 147 MiB Peak task count changed from 121 to 103 Previous test data: https://openqa

flatpak / KDE question

2020-05-13 Thread David
I have little experience if any with flatpaks on KDE. I just installed flatpak on my new Rawhide KDE The list below shows some of the dependencies: gnome-desktop3-3.37.1-1.fc33.x86_64 low-memory-monitor-2.0-4.fc32.x86_64 p11-kit-server-0.23.20-1.fc32.x86_64 pipewire-0.3.4-2.f

Fedora-IoT-32-20200512.0 compose check report

2020-05-13 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200513.0 compose check report

2020-05-13 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200513.0 compose check report

2020-05-13 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 597167 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/597167 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.i

Re: Curiosity in QA:Testcase base service manipulation

2020-05-13 Thread pmkel...@frontier.com
On 5/13/20 12:34, Adam Williamson wrote: I ended up putting (sudo su) at the top of each script and just ran the commands without the (su -c). That seemed to work fine. Is there a critical to the test reason to use (su -c)? No. It really just means "do this as root". There are various ways y

Re: a question for Rawhide users ( Rawhiders ?? )

2020-05-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:56:33AM -0500, David wrote: > It looks or appears to me that many if not all packages in Rawhide are > slightly > more recent versions that the ones available via flatpak.I know some > flatpaks > also offer a choice of a nightly version. > > I was just wondering or p

Fedora-Cloud-32-20200512.0 compose check report

2020-05-13 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 596122 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/596122 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.i

Fedora-Cloud-31-20200512.0 compose check report

2020-05-13 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj

Fedora-Cloud-30-20200512.0 compose check report

2020-05-13 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj

Re: Curiosity in QA:Testcase base service manipulation

2020-05-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2020-05-13 at 12:22 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > In regard to: QA:Testcase base service manipulation > > Back about a year ago now I started fiddling around with this test case > to see if I could make it a bit easier to run. > > A little background first. After I have my test m

Curiosity in QA:Testcase base service manipulation

2020-05-13 Thread pmkel...@frontier.com
In regard to: QA:Testcase base service manipulation Back about a year ago now I started fiddling around with this test case to see if I could make it a bit easier to run. A little background first. After I have my test machine set up and ready to start testing a new drop I always do the login

a question for Rawhide users ( Rawhiders ?? )

2020-05-13 Thread David
It looks or appears to me that many if not all packages in Rawhide are slightly more recent versions that the ones available via flatpak.I know some flatpaks also offer a choice of a nightly version. I was just wondering or pondering, which packages Rawhiders, prefer to run as a flatpak or vic

Re: user switching criterion proposal

2020-05-13 Thread Kamil Paral
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 5:56 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > I think we don't need the weasel form in this criterion as we actually > do want to block on user switching *fully working*. So I think I'd > agree with Lukas (and Brandon) that this can be changed to "perform", > but keeping the reference