No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-32-20200310.n.0):
ID: 543391 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/543391
ID: 543441 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_
OLD: Fedora-32-20200310.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200312.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 1
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Just to announce the change - I just dropped Windows 7 column from the
Fedora Media Writer test case, because Windows 7 is EOL now.
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AInstallation_test_matrix&type=revision&diff=568412&oldid=567341
___
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/160 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 542611 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/542611
ID: 542661 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_background
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/54266
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 2:58 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> Note: In point 2), we don't actually need 10 different test cases
> (templated or not). We might just create Testcase_desktop_app_single
> instead of those 10 and differentiate them on the matrix level the same way
> as we do with e.g. "Testcas
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200311.0):
ID: 542772 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/542772
Soft failed openQ
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:01 PM Jared K. Smith
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 9:31 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
>> There are some high-profile types of applications that I considered
>> including in the list above, but didn’t in the end:
>>
>> * word editor (e.g. libreoffice-writer)
>>
>> * sprea
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200311.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200312.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:13
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 89
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 7.59 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 14/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200311.n.0):
ID: 542386 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic
URL: https://o
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 9:31 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> There are some high-profile types of applications that I considered
> including in the list above, but didn’t in the end:
>
> * word editor (e.g. libreoffice-writer)
>
> * spreadsheet editor (e.g. libreoffice-calc)
>
> * video player (e.g
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:59 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> It has been 7 days since the last response to the thread and I received no
> further complaints, so I've put the criterion into effect:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_32_Final_Release_Criteria&type=revision&diff=568145&
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200308.0):
ID: 542526 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/542526
ID: 542527 Test:
It has been 7 days since the last response to the thread and I received no
further complaints, so I've put the criterion into effect:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_32_Final_Release_Criteria&type=revision&diff=568145&oldid=564126
I've done slight tweaks compared to the original
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
14 matches
Mail list logo
