Fedora-Cloud-30-20191129.0 compose check report

2019-11-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj

Re: Screencaster issue

2019-11-28 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 11/28/19 12:27 PM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/need-help-with-screencaster/4308 I'm still left with questions I need some help with. Apparently the main issue with the failed attempts is things not working with Wayland. The explanation seemed to support this

Re: Proposal: Asynchronous blocker review process (using Pagure)

2019-11-28 Thread Frantisek Zatloukal
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 1:31 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > > 5. Once some kind of understanding of the issue is formed, a privileged > member (e.g. a member of @fedora-qa FAS group) can start the vote by > including a command in his comment, e.g. "START VOTE" on a separate line. > (Note that this is ju

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20191128.n.0 changes

2019-11-28 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191127.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191128.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 92 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 616.33 KiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora-Rawhide-20191128.n.0 compose check report

2019-11-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 26 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 99/161 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-

Re: Proposal: Asynchronous blocker review process (using Pagure)

2019-11-28 Thread Kamil Paral
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 5:59 PM Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > > 7. People vote by submitting comments containing VOTE +1/0/-1 on a >> separate line (and including any justification or feedback they wish in the >> comment as well; the command has to simply be on its own line so that we >> can detect it w

Screencaster issue

2019-11-28 Thread pmkel...@frontier.com
I've been needing a screen caster for a while. I starting "auditioning" them and ran into a consistent problem. The folks at Ask Fedora got me to a good place and provided an explanation as to why the video wasn't working (link next). https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/need-help-with-screencaster

Re: Proposal: Asynchronous blocker review process (using Pagure)

2019-11-28 Thread Kamil Paral
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 5:14 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > So overall I agree with a lot of what you wrote. It does cause me to > wonder if writing some kind of plugin/extension for Pagure, or just > writing the functionality into the blockerbugs app, might possibly be > *less* work than writing an

Re: For today's agenda item - Proposed disk unmount test case

2019-11-28 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 12:28 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > > XFS kernel (since /etc/fstab sets / fs_passno to 0, we should only see > this message with default installations) > [ 372.027026] XFS (vdb3): Starting recovery (logdev: internal) Rats, the part in parenthesis is confusing. Rewrite: (we sho

Re: For today's agenda item - Proposed disk unmount test case

2019-11-28 Thread Chris Murphy
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 2:30 AM Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 9:17 PM Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> A fair point about VM testing is whether the disk cache mode affects >> the outcome. I use unsafe because it's faster and I embrace misery. I >> think QA bots are now mostly using unsa

Fwd: Proposal: Asynchronous blocker review process (using Pagure)

2019-11-28 Thread Lukas Ruzicka
I support the idea of an asynchronous blocker bug process. > Blocker Bugs App (DIY solution) > ** > > I am not sure how complicated that would be, but the blockerbug application could do the stuff and in the background it could have Bugzilla as a backed, so the Bugzilla process de

Re: Proposal: Asynchronous blocker review process (using Pagure)

2019-11-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2019-11-28 at 13:29 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > What are your thoughts? Does the proposal sound reasonable? Would you > change something? Would you use a different backend system? Have I > forgotten something important? Feedback welcome. So overall I agree with a lot of what you wrote. It

Proposal: Asynchronous blocker review process (using Pagure)

2019-11-28 Thread Kamil Paral
We've talked about replacing blocker bug review meetings with something else for a long time. The meeting has an upside of a higher communication bandwidth, but also a downside of requiring participants to be available at the same time (throughout the world), often being extremely long, and being s

Fedora-Cloud-31-20191128.0 compose check report

2019-11-28 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj

Re: For today's agenda item - Proposed disk unmount test case

2019-11-28 Thread Kamil Paral
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 9:17 PM Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:35 AM pmkel...@frontier.com > wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tablepc/Draft_testcase_reboot > > Why does it need to happen on baremetal only? Any problem discovered > by this test case is sure to ne