On 10/18/19 2:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I might need more logs from your case to be sure of what's going on -
if you could put the dnf logs and system journals up somewhere it'd
help. Also, did you re-run the download phase after updating the
system-upgrade plugin? You do need to do that...
On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 18:12 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 10/17/19 5:08 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 10/18/19 7:49 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > That is the symptom of the problem. Did you get the updated plugin?
> > > One thing I wondered is what would happen if you manually added the
> > > "mi
On 10/18/19 7:49 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
One very odd thing here though is that it's looking for fc30 packages. Maybe there is an rpmfusion problem as well since there is no appstream data past 30 yet.
Oh, BTW, it is in the 31 repo of rpmfusion it is just not updated in name
[root@f31bg ~]#
On 10/17/19 5:08 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/18/19 7:49 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
That is the symptom of the problem. Did you get the updated plugin?
One thing I wondered is what would happen if you manually added the
"missing" rpms to the cache directory after the regular download
process was c
On 10/18/19 7:49 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/17/19 4:16 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Almost there But the problem may not be a "fedora" problem?
2019-10-17T23:09:44Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum:
/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/rpmfusion-free-058b175644bc1430/packages/rpmfusion-free-app
On 10/17/19 4:16 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Almost there But the problem may not be a "fedora" problem?
2019-10-17T23:09:44Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum:
/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/rpmfusion-free-058b175644bc1430/packages/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data-30-1.20181021.fc30.noarch.rpm
On 10/18/19 4:41 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 10:17 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/17/19 2:15 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
The issue seems to be related to
2019-10-16T23:34:50Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum:
/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-3589ee8a7ee1691d/packa
On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 10:17 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 10/17/19 2:15 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > The issue seems to be related to
> >
> > 2019-10-16T23:34:50Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum:
> > /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-3589ee8a7ee1691d/packages/plasma-desktop-5.16.5-1.f
On 10/17/19 2:15 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
The issue seems to be related to
2019-10-16T23:34:50Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum:
/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-3589ee8a7ee1691d/packages/plasma-desktop-5.16.5-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
There was a recent discussion about this issue and a
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/153 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20191016.n.0):
ID: 471830 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_terminal
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/471830
ID: 471949 Test: x86_64 Workst
OLD: Fedora-31-20191016.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20191017.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:9
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 3
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 38.00 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Ed Greshko composed on 2019-10-17 17:58 (UTC+0800):
> FWIW, I'm using
> dnf --skip-broken --allowerasing system-upgrade download --releasever=31
> I suppose it is possible I'm hitting a bad mirror?
This may be the same problem my last few tries to upgrade. I removed kde*, kf5*
and plasm*, upgr
On 10/17/19 5:58 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/17/19 5:15 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Thanks Thrown a bit since dnf.log times are Z tagged.
The issue seems to be related to
2019-10-16T23:34:50Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum:
/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-3589ee8a7ee1691d/pac
On 10/17/19 5:15 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Thanks Thrown a bit since dnf.log times are Z tagged.
The issue seems to be related to
2019-10-16T23:34:50Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum:
/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/fedora-3589ee8a7ee1691d/packages/plasma-desktop-5.16.5-1.fc31.x86_6
On 10/17/19 2:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2019-10-17 at 07:52 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
This is the first time I've had issues with an upgrade.
Laptop is a fully updated F30 system running only KDE desktop. It is an older
Acer Aspire 5920.
The package are downloaded and upon "system
15 matches
Mail list logo
