The following Fedora 29 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
219 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-fa5843e0e1
asterisk-16.2.1-1.fc29
205 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c84f291592
WALinuxAgent-2.2.38-1.fc29
200 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/up
The following Fedora 31 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1b8cbd39ff
golang-1.13.1-1.fc31
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-52b360546c
suricata-4.1.5-3.fc31
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/F
The following Fedora 30 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e53c0c7765
chromium-77.0.3865.90-2.fc30
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-14af6fde2e
thunderbird-68.1.1-1.fc30
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.o
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/153 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-31-20191005.n.0):
ID: 464009 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/464009
ID: 464022 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
OLD: Fedora-31-20191005.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20191006.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 63
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 628.15 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.clo
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191005.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191006.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 38
Downgraded packages: 4
Size of added packages: 82.52 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 13:10:19 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 12:50 PM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
>
> Both have been rejected as blockers due to being too "edge case". But
> pasting into QT applications seems sufficiently broad to be
> considering
> as blocki