[Test Day] Kernel 5.2 Test Week Report

Hey All, In the last Kernel 5.2 Test Day we had about 65 Testers. The new Kernel was tested across mutiple arches and an old regression[0] was noted , the bug was reopened and now has been fixed. The wiki page holds the results https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2019-07-22_Kernel_5.2_Test_We

2019-09-16 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting - Minutes

== #fedora-meeting: Fedora QA Meeting == Meeting started by adamw at 15:01:31 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2019-09-16/fedora-qa.2019-09-16-15.01.log.html . Meeting summary --

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190920.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190919.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190920.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 157 Dropped packages:7 Upgraded packages: 100 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 2.03 GiB Size of dropped packages

Fedora-Rawhide-20190920.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Wor

Fedora 31 Final blocker status email #2

Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. mutter — can't turn zoom off once enabled — NEW ACTION: maintainers to diagnose and fix issue 2. gdm — Second user gets locked out of his session every ~10 seconds — NEW ACTION: maintainer to diagnose and fix issue 3. gno

[Test Day] Fedora 31 Upgrade Test Day 2019-09-23

Hey All, As we approach the Final Release date for Fedora 31, most users will be upgrading. This test day will help us understand if everything is working perfectly. This test day will cover both a Gnome graphical upgrade and an u

Introduction Mail

Hi, I'm Seema Saharan from MGEC,Jaipur.I'm currently pursuing my B.Tech in CSE now.I would love to contribute to Fedora (and opensource in general) and was introduced to it and helped out by Sumantro from RedHat. Thanks. Yours truly, Seema Saharan _

Re: proposal: move "image size" criterion from Beta to Final

On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 09:30 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > I'm happy we have some automation in place now, but I feel this whole > discussion went somewhat off-topic from the proposal. It seems I haven't > gained any support for simply moving the criterion to Final, and I don't > really want to make s

Fedora-31-20190920.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190919.n.1): ID: 455182 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/455182 Old failures (same test failed

Fedora 31 compose report: 20190920.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-31-20190919.n.1 NEW: Fedora-31-20190920.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 3 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: proposal: move "image size" criterion from Beta to Final

I'm happy we have some automation in place now, but I feel this whole discussion went somewhat off-topic from the proposal. It seems I haven't gained any support for simply moving the criterion to Final, and I don't really want to make such a trivial check more complex (in terms of release criteria