On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 08:29 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 17:38 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:35 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > > I like this approach better than just moving the criterion to Final
> > > because in cases of large overages, the pack
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Wor
On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 11:30 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> Was the 0916 drop of F31 the one that became Beta 1.1? I am curious
> because I have been in the process of testing the 0916 drop. So far I
> haven't found any new problems, but RHBZ #1694782 still applies.
The candidate composes
On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 17:38 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:35 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> > I like this approach better than just moving the criterion to Final
> > because in cases of large overages, the package gymnastics that might
> > be required to make it work could prov
Hello,
I am Sarvesh Jhanwar from JECRC College . I am currently pursuing my B.Tech in
CSE .
I would love to contribute to Fedora (and opensource in general) and was
introduced to opensource as i came into knowledge with RedHat Certification
program and did RHCSA and RHCE plus have been working on
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190917.n.2):
ID: 45 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/45
ID: 453334 Test: x86_64 Serve
OLD: Fedora-31-20190917.n.2
NEW: Fedora-31-20190918.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:10
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 131
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 147.20 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:35 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 9:55 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > Considering this, I believe it makes sense to move the current criterion
> from Beta to Final.
> >
> I'd be okay with letting the responsible team specify a buffer they're
> willing to
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:38 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> We could consider still enforcing sizes which clearly relate to optical
> media (so, basically, 700MB and 4.7GB sizes).
>
But we enforce them, for Final. And for Beta, we don't block on optical
media anyway. That was one of my arguments wh
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:34 PM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:55 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > We currently have the following Beta criterion:
> > "The release-blocking images must meet current size requirements." [1]
> >
> > The latest "Workstation image is oversized" bug [2]
Hola!
A gentle reminder, Gnome 3.34 Test Day is underway.
we try to make sure that all the gnome features
are performing as they should and then file bugs well ahead of time.
We need to ensure it's working well enough and catch any remaining issues.
It's also pretty easy to join in: all you'll ne
11 matches
Mail list logo
