Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:23 AM wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 14:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 13:25 -0400, David Cantrell wrote: > > > > Josh, to be fair, I can see Neal's point here. In a way you seem > > > > to be > > > > kinda sending him in circles here: "anaco

Fedora 31 compose report: 20190902.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-31-20190901.n.0 NEW: Fedora-31-20190902.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.88 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Fedora-31-20190902.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 31/142 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190901.n.0): ID: 440045 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/440045 ID: 440047 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso ins

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190902.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190901.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190902.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 12 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 54 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 99.59 MiB Size of dropped packages:0

Fedora-Rawhide-20190902.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 10 of 45 required tests failed, 6 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: FAILED: compose.cl