On 8/28/19 3:13 PM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
I've probably misunderstood some of this. Please feel free to let me know where my
mistakes are.
The btrfs filesystem has been in development for years. It entered into the kernel
in 2009. Red Hat even had an engineer working on it, but he le
On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 15:59 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On one hand I understand all of the consternation around making btrfs bugs
> > blockers for Fedora, but on the other hand it seems a bit silly to be having
> > this conversation at all based on hitting a bug that went into the merge
> > w
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:07 PM Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 03:01:16PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Fedora chugs along at the rate of daily upstream Linus snapshots. If
> > you're hitting and fixing issues before Fedora users see them, I'm
> > curious why Fedora users would eve
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:30 PM Laura Abbott wrote:
>
>
> > I also think there are other perspectives that might at least
> > potentially be useful here. Right now we've mainly heard from a couple
> > of community folks who are very passionate about btrfs, and Red Hat
> > folks from anaconda/kerne
On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 13:24 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 21/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
So most of the failures boil down, I think, to one bug: gnome-initial-
setup isn't working. We've had various incarnations of this problem in
rapid su
I have been following the btrfs discussion with great interest. What I
knew about btrfs until a few hours ago was zero, but even in that state
I learned more about Fedora and the folks that work on it. I am very
impressed with the energy everyone brought to the discussion. From my
view I really
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:40 PM Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 02:35:39PM -0400, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > On 8/28/19 1:58 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 07:53:20AM -0400, Laura Abbott wrote:
> > > > On 8/26/19 11:39 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 2
On 8/28/19 1:58 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 07:53:20AM -0400, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 8/26/19 11:39 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 11:16 AM Laura Abbott wrote:
On 8/23/19 9:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:17 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
Sure there are better explanations but...
DOOMED: a mandatory step for our blocking deliverables failed. x86_64
workstation dvd iso can't build for example
FINISHED_INCOMPLETE: a non blocking deliverable failed. x86_64 xfce dvd iso for
example
FINISHED (i'm not sure, didn't see it for a while):
OLD: Fedora-31-20190826.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20190828.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:13
Upgraded packages: 202
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 924.23 MiB
Size of dropped packages:333.07 MiB
On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 06:51 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2019, alcir...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 00:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Wow Adam.
> > This is a very interesting explanation.
> > It could be converted to a Magazine or
On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 07:13 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Alessio wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019, 7:07 PM Robert P. J. Day
> > wrote:
> >
> > what is the *proper* ISO to install that will eventually get me to
> > fedora 31? thanks.
> >
> >
> > Hello.
>
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 21/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190826.n.0):
ID: 437569 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/437569
ID: 437570 Test: x86_64 Serv
On 8/28/19 7:13 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Alessio wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019, 7:07 PM Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>
>> what is the *proper* ISO to install that will eventually get me to
>> fedora 31? thanks.
>>
>>
>> Hello.
>> I think you should look here:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Alessio wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019, 7:07 PM Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> what is the *proper* ISO to install that will eventually get me to
> fedora 31? thanks.
>
>
> Hello.
> I think you should look here:
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
9 of 45 required tests failed, 6 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Wor
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190827.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190828.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 116
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.39 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019, alcir...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 00:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >
> >
>
> Wow Adam.
> This is a very interesting explanation.
> It could be converted to a Magazine or Commblog post, or to a quick
> doc. :-)
i was just about to say ... :-) also,
On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 00:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>
>
Wow Adam.
This is a very interesting explanation.
It could be converted to a Magazine or Commblog post, or to a quick
doc. :-)
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hello,
My user name in FAS account is anabsc
Thank so much to answer me,
Bye
Ana
El mié., 28 ago. 2019 a las 6:24, Alessio () escribió:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:36 PM anna coobs wrote:
> >
> > Hello QA team,
> >
> > I am very happy to join the QA team and make a contribution, if it is
> pos
On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 17:15 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> i'm confused ... are you saying there will be no difference between
> this release:
>
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-31/compose/Workstation/x86_64/iso/
>
> and the final, official release of f31
21 matches
Mail list logo
