Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 47 required tests failed, 3 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 9/146 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190529.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190531.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:11
Dropped images: 11
Added packages: 51
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 117
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 62.75 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:12 AM stan wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2019 11:50:20 -0700
> Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> > On 5/30/19 9:52 AM, stan wrote:
> > > # mount -t vfat /dev/sda8 /mnt/to_efi
> > > mount: /mnt/to_efi: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock
> > > on /dev/sda8, missing codepage or he
On Thu, 30 May 2019 11:53:43 -0600
Chris Murphy wrote:
> That's a useful size for experimenting with systemd-boot, which
> expects kernels + initramfs and BLS snippets to all go on the EFI
> system partition. The Fedora installer's default for the EFI system
> partition is around 200MiB, and the
On Thu, 30 May 2019 11:50:20 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/30/19 9:52 AM, stan wrote:
> > # mount -t vfat /dev/sda8 /mnt/to_efi
> > mount: /mnt/to_efi: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock
> > on /dev/sda8, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
>
> Check the journal to see
On Thu, 30 May 2019 12:04:31 -0600
Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:53 AM stan wrote:
> >
> > # mount -t vfat /dev/sda8 /mnt/to_efi
> > mount: /mnt/to_efi: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock
> > on /dev/sda8, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
>
> # blk
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 07:49 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> I have added the requested information to the bugs as shown below:
>
> Bug 1694782 - Authorization pop up can not be satified or dismissed
>
> > So basically, the problem is that if you have an admin user with no
> > password, wh
I have added the requested information to the bugs as shown below:
Bug 1694782 - Authorization pop up can not be satified or dismissed
> So basically, the problem is that if you have an admin user with no
> password, when an action requiring admin privileges is attempted, you
> get this non-sat
