Anybody else able to reproduce this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715699
Basically you just boot a Rawhide LiveOS image in a VM with
systemd.log_level=debug and then once booted see what you get for
# journalctl -b -o short-monotonic
It should start with 0 seconds, with the first
The following are notable results from my testing of Rawhide Workstation
Live (F31) drop 0529:
These are outside the scope of fedora standard testing, but I have
several test cases I run to test my "as deployed" configurations.
DNF fails to load large packages see RHBZ #1715617. The bug repor
On 5/30/19 9:52 AM, stan wrote:
# mount -t vfat /dev/sda8 /mnt/to_efi
mount: /mnt/to_efi: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda8,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
Check the journal to see if there is any more info.
Also, run "file -s /dev/sda8" to see what is
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:53 AM stan wrote:
>
> # mount -t vfat /dev/sda8 /mnt/to_efi
> mount: /mnt/to_efi: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda8,
> missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
# blkid
# dosfsck -avn /dev/sda8
--
Chris Murphy
__
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:17 AM stan wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2019 21:41:13 -0600
> Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> > That would cause both fc30 and fc31 to boot with the same kernel
> > options in common except for the root which is explicitly set in the
> > *conf file. I haven't tested how the *conf fi
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 12:53 PM stan wrote:
>
> So, I decided to go for the UEFI install after creating an EFI system
> partition on the drive.
>
> Number Start (sector)End (sector) Size Code Name
>1 2097152 4194303 1024.0 MiB 8300
>2 4194304
On Thu, 30 May 2019 09:38:12 -0700
stan wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2019 12:12:12 -0700
> Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> Progress report:
>
> I deleted the mbr using gdisk, and put the proper type on the existing
> linux partitions, and the install succeeded. I think it was failing
> to install because t
On Wed, 29 May 2019 12:12:12 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
Progress report:
I deleted the mbr using gdisk, and put the proper type on the existing
linux partitions, and the install succeeded. I think it was failing to
install because the installer was confused by the labels on the existing
linux par
On Wed, 29 May 2019 21:41:13 -0600
Chris Murphy wrote:
Thanks for the detailed response. That's complicated, and I've saved it
for future reference; I'll need to let it settle for a while before
reading it again.
> No symlinks on FAT.
>
> As complicated as it seems, the way forward for two or
