I'm really interested on the livet crash, but I can't reproduce it with
latest branched compose.
Can you provide us with reproduction steps?
Hau idatzi du Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) erabiltzaileak (2019 api. 10,
az. (02:59)):
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:35 PM Chris Murphy
> wrote:
> >
> > On
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 1:37 AM Berend De Schouwer
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 23:26 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> > Well, this time it did the updates after rebooting, buttt
> > then I got:
> >
> >Minimal BASH-link line editing is supported. For the
> >first wo
On 4/9/19 12:36 AM, Berend De Schouwer wrote:
It seems to be a BLS problem.
Thank you! I will check it out tomorrow, time permitting.
Is there a bug ticket opened on this yet?
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
Today's move to selinux-policy 3.14.4-9 fixed this for me -- thanks
kindly, follks!
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:21 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 09:41 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm writing to confirm that "enforcing=0" on the relevant kernel brings
> > up g
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
17 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could no
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 12/144 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm), 2/24 (i386)
ID: 379607 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/379607
ID: 379619 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz
ins
On 4/9/19 1:08 PM, Thomas S. Clayborne wrote:
That's odd. I've used it with no issues through out the duration of the release
It doesn't crash right away, but certain window actions, particularly
closing a remmina full-screen window cause a crash that takes out
gnome-shell. (I think that's w
That's odd. I've used it with no issues through out the duration of the release
- Tom
Apr 9, 2019, 4:02 PM by sam...@sieb.net:
> On 4/8/19 2:30 PM, Thomas S. Clayborne wrote:
>
>> You should be able to uninstall them using dnf from the command line,
>> assuming you can get to a TTY. If you ma
On 4/8/19 2:30 PM, Thomas S. Clayborne wrote:
You should be able to uninstall them using dnf from the command line, assuming
you can get to a TTY. If you manually installed any (e.g. dash2dock) check the
git repository to see if it comes with a makefile rule to uninstall the
extension. I menti
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
17 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could no
On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 23:26 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> On 4/8/19 6:16 PM, sixpack13 wrote:
> > some days ago I did:
> >
> > 1.
> > sudo dnf upgrade --refresh
> >
> > 2.
> > sudo dnf install dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
> >
> > 3.
> > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=30
>
On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 18:45 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> On 4/8/19 6:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 17:13 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > This is what I am running to upgrade from 29 to 30 beta:
> > >
> > > # rpm --rebuilddb
> > > # rpm -Va --nofiles
On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 09:41 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm writing to confirm that "enforcing=0" on the relevant kernel brings
> up gdm OK, and things seem correct.
>
> Should we file a bug against this, or add to
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697667
>
> Also, FWIW,
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190408.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190409.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 6
Added packages: 30
Dropped packages:12
Upgraded packages: 94
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 58.74 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hello,
I'm writing to confirm that "enforcing=0" on the relevant kernel brings
up gdm OK, and things seem correct.
Should we file a bug against this, or add to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697667
Also, FWIW, I am subscribed to the list but didn't get Adam's response
directly, but
I can confirm that the F30 server build does not boot on MacPro2,1
despite having mixed-EFI set. Now that the systems are completely
abandoned by Apple it would be really good if we supported them out of
the box. Using the older images from
https://mattgadient.com/2016/07/11/linux-dvd-images-an
On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 08:03 -0400, Andrew J. Hutton wrote:
> Could someone confirm that pre-30 has the CONFIG_EFI_MIXED turned on?
Does this help? fc29 and fc30 kernels:
$ grep CONFIG_EFI_MIXED config-5.0.*
config-5.0.3-200.fc29.x86_64:CONFIG_EFI_MIXED=y
config-5.0.4-200.fc29.x86_64:CONFIG_EFI_M
Could someone confirm that pre-30 has the CONFIG_EFI_MIXED turned on?
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.h
You may have a look at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697878: After fresh
install of fedora 30 nightly compose date 2019-04-05, logging into
gnome desktop freezes the screen (edit)
and maybe also
Bug 1695396 - dnf upgrade to fedora 29 from fedora 28 fails, gdm
session freezes afte
On 4/9/19 9:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 17:13 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This is what I am running to upgrade from 29 to 30 beta:
>>
>> # rpm --rebuilddb
>> # rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
>>if anything is too new, do a
>> # dnf downgrade offen
On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 23:26 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> On 4/8/19 6:16 PM, sixpack13 wrote:
> > some days ago I did:
> >
> > 1.
> > sudo dnf upgrade --refresh
> >
> > 2.
> > sudo dnf install dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
> >
> > 3.
> > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=30 --
21 matches
Mail list logo
