On 4/8/19 6:16 PM, sixpack13 wrote:
some days ago I did:
1.
sudo dnf upgrade --refresh
2.
sudo dnf install dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
3.
sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=30
--setopt='module_platform_id=platform:f30' --allowerasing
- the above is ONE line with a blank
Am Freitag, den 05.04.2019, 23:06 + schrieb
rawh...@fedoraproject.org:
> Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test
> event
> for Fedora 30 Branched 20190405.n.0. Please help run some tests for
> this
> nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
> re
The following Fedora 28 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
362 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d510cfd7eb
jgraphx-3.6.0.0-6.fc28
311 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d7aeaa74da
nodejs-brace-expansion-1.1.11-1.fc28
310 https://bodhi.fedoraproj
On 4/8/19 6:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 17:13 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
This is what I am running to upgrade from 29 to 30 beta:
# rpm --rebuilddb
# rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
if anything is too new, do a
# dnf downgrade offender(s) (no proble
some days ago I did:
1.
sudo dnf upgrade --refresh
2.
sudo dnf install dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
3.
sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=30
--setopt='module_platform_id=platform:f30' --allowerasing
- the above is ONE line with a blank between "=30" and "--setopt" -
On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 17:13 -0700, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is what I am running to upgrade from 29 to 30 beta:
>
> # rpm --rebuilddb
> # rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
>if anything is too new, do a
> # dnf downgrade offender(s) (no problems found)
>
> # dnf --enablere
em, e.g. this one:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/Fedora-30-20190408.n.0/compose/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-20190408.n.0.iso
ensure you boot in UEFI mode. Please report back whether it works. If
it doesn't work, please check the logs - you should be able to log in
Hi All,
This is what I am running to upgrade from 29 to 30 beta:
# rpm --rebuilddb
# rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
if anything is too new, do a
# dnf downgrade offender(s) (no problems found)
# dnf --enablerepo=* update --refresh
# dnf install python3-dnf-plugin-system-upgrade
# dnf
On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 19:28 -0400, Boyan Penkov wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Are folks seeing Rawhide stalling after endlessly searching for
> /dev/mapper/fedora-home? I saw this issue after the 20190408 or
> 20180407 update…
Try booting with enforcing=0. If that works, it
Hello folks,
Are folks seeing Rawhide stalling after endlessly searching for
/dev/mapper/fedora-home? I saw this issue after the 20190408 or 20180407
update…
Cheers!
--
Boyan Penkov
www.boyanpenkov.com
___
test mailing list -- test
On 4/8/19 3:25 PM, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
>
> The page https://getfedora.org/workstation/prerelease/ mentions using the
> fedora media writer to write ISOs to USB drives.
>
> It says you can download it using dnf, but it does not give the package name.
>
> The package name is "mediawriter".
The page https://getfedora.org/workstation/prerelease/ mentions using the
fedora media writer to write ISOs to USB drives.
It says you can download it using dnf, but it does not give the package name.
The package name is "mediawriter". It would be nice it it actually said
that next to where it m
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 3:41 PM wrote:
>
>
>
> > You should be able to uninstall them using dnf from the command line,
> > assuming you can get to a TTY. If you manually installed any (e.g.
> > dash2dock) check the git repository to see if it comes with a makefile
> > rule to uninstall the extensio
Great! Glad you got it running. When you re-install the extensions (as opposed
to restoring the folder name) does the issue still happen?
- Tom
Apr 8, 2019, 5:40 PM by a...@clueserver.org:
>
>
>> You should be able to uninstall them using dnf from the command line,
>> assuming you can get to a
> You should be able to uninstall them using dnf from the command line,
> assuming you can get to a TTY. If you manually installed any (e.g.
> dash2dock) check the git repository to see if it comes with a makefile
> rule to uninstall the extension. I mention dash2dock specifically because
> I kno
You should be able to uninstall them using dnf from the command line, assuming
you can get to a TTY. If you manually installed any (e.g. dash2dock) check the
git repository to see if it comes with a makefile rule to uninstall the
extension. I mention dash2dock specifically because I know that ex
> You kinda have to fix or mitigate those in order, because gnome-shell
> could be crashing due to either a) or b); or even d) which are the
> gnome-shell extensions. Maybe the easiest way to test that is to
> create a new user on the cli, and attempt to login as that new user. I
> think gnome she
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 6:22 PM zubin choudhary wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm Zubin. I'm 19 years old. Using Linux for a while now wanted to
> contribute back to the community, Fedora is a great community to be part of.
> I have some experience in python scripting and on Web Programming. Looking
> forward
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 1:29 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
> Ideally you can boot without it using
> the open source nouveau driver.
That's awkward. Rewrite:
Ideally you can boot without 'nomodeset' so that it uses the open
source nouveau driver.
--
Chris Murphy
___
There are quite a lot of SELinux AVC denials. I suggest as a starting point:
# restorecon -rv /
Next is this:
Apr 08 11:35:05 daimajin kernel: nvidia: loading out-of-tree module
taints kernel.
Apr 08 11:35:05 daimajin kernel: nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
Fedora can't support out
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 10:55 AM wrote:
>>
>>
>> I upgraded from Fedora 29 to Fedora 30 beta on my laptop.
>>
>> The system boots, asks for the drive password, and then brings up my
>> login
>> in GDM. I select my user account and then enter my password. The screen
>> goes black and then goes b
> On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 09:54 -0700, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
>> I upgraded from Fedora 29 to Fedora 30 beta on my laptop.
>>
>> The system boots, asks for the drive password, and then brings up my
>> login
>> in GDM. I select my user account and then enter my password. The screen
>> goes black
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 10:55 AM wrote:
>
>
> I upgraded from Fedora 29 to Fedora 30 beta on my laptop.
>
> The system boots, asks for the drive password, and then brings up my login
> in GDM. I select my user account and then enter my password. The screen
> goes black and then goes back to the gdm
On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 04:26 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i have no idea if package groups are supposed to be installable at
> this point, but:
>
> $ sudo dnf groupinstall "Electronic Lab"
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:55 ago on Mon 08 Apr 2019
> 04:20:34 AM EDT.
> No match for group
On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 09:54 -0700, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
> I upgraded from Fedora 29 to Fedora 30 beta on my laptop.
>
> The system boots, asks for the drive password, and then brings up my login
> in GDM. I select my user account and then enter my password. The screen
> goes black and then g
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 14/144 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm), 2/24 (i386)
ID: 379607 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/379607
ID: 379608 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_updat
I upgraded from Fedora 29 to Fedora 30 beta on my laptop.
The system boots, asks for the drive password, and then brings up my login
in GDM. I select my user account and then enter my password. The screen
goes black and then goes back to the gdm login screen.
If I try XFCE, it just hangs.
There
OLD: Fedora-30-20190407.n.0
NEW: Fedora-30-20190408.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 31
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 58.47 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
30 of 47 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could n
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190407.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190408.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 13
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.05 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
i have no idea if package groups are supposed to be installable at
this point, but:
$ sudo dnf groupinstall "Electronic Lab"
Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:55 ago on Mon 08 Apr 2019
04:20:34 AM EDT.
No match for group package "eqntott"
No match for group package "gds2pov"
No match for gro
31 matches
Mail list logo
