==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA Meeting
==
Meeting started by adamw at 16:01:49 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2019-02-11/fedora-qa.2019-02-11-16.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
On 2/11/19 3:17 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 2:24 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:58 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Sorry that it's taken me so long to get back to this.
I think the feedback on this has been mostly positive on the Beta
criteria, but
On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 15:21 -0500, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> The 0211 ISO was downloaded, check sum checked, burned to DVD, and used
> to boot a bare metal PC (Lenovo M58p with E8400 processor). all of that
> ran good with no problem. The media check passed and Anaconda started
> with no pr
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 2:24 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:58 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
> > Sorry that it's taken me so long to get back to this.
> >
> > I think the feedback on this has been mostly positive on the Beta
> > criteria, but I'd like to tweak the phrasing
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 9:58 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 7:18 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 08:33 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was
> > > broken on certain printers. As a
Hi,
Adam, you should send these emails with more time prior the meeting, only
now I read them. :-/
Kind regards,
Silvia
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 18:00, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> # F30 Blocker Review meeting
> # Date: 2019-02-11
> # Time: 17:00 UTC
> # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.fr
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 7:18 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 08:33 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was
> > broken on certain printers. As a result of that discussion, it became
> > apparent that there was no cri
On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 11:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
> Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
>
> Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
> 27 of 47 required tests failed, 17 results missing
> openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requi
Missing expected images:
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
27 of 47 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could n
