No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/133 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 287534 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/287534
ID: 287551 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
OLD: Fedora-29-20180929.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20181001.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 79
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 11.11 MiB
Size of dropped packages:11.81 MiB
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA Meeting
==
Meeting started by adamw at 15:00:59 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-10-01/fedora-qa.2018-10-01-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 11:06:11AM -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> Now all that aside the few brief things I have read about Silverblue
> have made me curious. Is there a place where I can read a more
> complete description of Silverblue; perhaps even see some
> architecture, data-flow, and r
In regard to the proposed release criteria:
1) I've come to a point where I accept that I am in a small minority of
folks that do installs from ISO burned to DVD. I am okay with removing
this as a blocker. I will continue using this method as long as I can
and I will certainly make a bug repor
I keep seeing Silverblue being referred to as immutable. Also
descriptions that say it avoids problems with OS crashes due to
misbehaving application software.
In earlier times there were some things that at least in theory were
considered immutable. In more recent times physics and cosmology
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 32/133 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180924.n.2):
ID: 287032 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/287032
ID: 287035 Test: x86_6
