No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180917.n.1):
ID: 283832 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/283832
ID: 283833 Test: x86_64
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 284048 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/284048
ID: 284064 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinsta
On 9/21/18 11:14 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
> On 9/21/18 11:02 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 9/21/18 9:14 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> I have had this problem pre beta images. This is the F29-armfhp code base.
>>>
>>> I am running vnc server as a service. I have edited the xstartup to have:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:56:07 -0400
"pmkel...@frontier.com" wrote:
> BTW does doing network install mean I have to have a server setup to
> serve the installs?
I think you are mixing two different install methods. There is a
netinstall image, that has a barebones Fedora that gets installed, and
On 9/21/18 11:02 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 9/21/18 9:14 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have had this problem pre beta images. This is the F29-armfhp code base.
I am running vnc server as a service. I have edited the xstartup to have:
# exec /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc
exec /bin/sh /etc/xdg/xfce4/
On 9/21/18 3:40 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/21/18 12:35 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/21/18 11:56 AM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
BTW does doing network install mean I have to have a server setup to
serve the installs? I only ask because right now my knowledge of
servers (now to set them up a
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:35:17PM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >BTW does doing network install mean I have to have a server setup
> >to serve the installs? I only ask because right now my knowledge
> >of servers (now to set them up and maintain them) is zero and
> >there doesn't seem to be any auto
On 9/21/18 12:39 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 9/21/18 3:35 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/21/18 11:56 AM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
BTW does doing network install mean I have to have a server setup to
serve the installs? I only ask because right now my knowledge of
servers (now to set them u
On 9/21/18 12:35 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/21/18 11:56 AM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
BTW does doing network install mean I have to have a server setup to
serve the installs? I only ask because right now my knowledge of
servers (now to set them up and maintain them) is zero and there
doesn
On 9/21/18 3:35 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 9/21/18 11:56 AM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
BTW does doing network install mean I have to have a server setup to
serve the installs? I only ask because right now my knowledge of
servers (now to set them up and maintain them) is zero and there
does
On 9/21/18 11:56 AM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
BTW does doing network install mean I have to have a server setup to
serve the installs? I only ask because right now my knowledge of servers
(now to set them up and maintain them) is zero and there doesn't seem to
be any automatic tools to help
On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 08:49 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> Yesterday afternoon (9/20), I did a clean install of F29 Beta 1.5 onto
> bare metal via DVD. The PC is a Lenovo M59P with an E8400 processor. The
> ISO had been check-summed and passed. The PC booted fine and the media
> test ran
On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 14:56 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
>
> On 9/21/18 1:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 22:35 -0400, Harold Dost wrote:
> > > Is having this as a test criteria *that* burdensome?
> >
> > Yes, frankly. Not a lot of testers even keep a DVD-RW drive a
OLD: Fedora-29-20180918.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20180919.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 1
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On 9/21/18 11:02 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 9/21/18 9:14 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have had this problem pre beta images. This is the F29-armfhp code base.
I am running vnc server as a service. I have edited the xstartup to have:
# exec /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc
exec /bin/sh /etc/xdg/xfce4/
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 09:24:56PM +, Rick Stevens wrote:
> Ok, so ISO images would still be produced and could be burned to OM
> for installation. There just isn't any guarantee (at release) that the
> OM would actually boot and one could squawk it if it didn't and not be
> poo-poo'd about it.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 02:23:24PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Speaking for I believe most of the QA team: "We'd be happy to". Testing
> optical boot is a major PITA. The decision is not ours, though, but I
> assume it belongs to the groups owning the media currently blocking optical
> boot. Which
On 9/21/18 1:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 22:35 -0400, Harold Dost wrote:
Is having this as a test criteria *that* burdensome?
Yes, frankly. Not a lot of testers even keep a DVD-RW drive and media
around any more. It takes like a half hour just to write all the media
f
On 9/21/18 10:20 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:33:11 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
A few days later, and GNOME Shell is hardly usable anymore.
Mouse lag, stuttering, wiindow usage taking seconds,
itt gets slower and slower. Just watch these typos
as
On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 13:52 -0400, Harold Dost wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 1:30 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 22:35 -0400, Harold Dost wrote:
> > > Is having this as a test criteria *that* burdensome?
> >
> > Yes, frankly. Not a lot of testers even keep a DVD-RW drive
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 1:30 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 22:35 -0400, Harold Dost wrote:
> > Is having this as a test criteria *that* burdensome?
>
> Yes, frankly. Not a lot of testers even keep a DVD-RW drive and media
> around any more. It takes like a half hour just to w
On 9/21/18 1:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 22:35 -0400, Harold Dost wrote:
Is having this as a test criteria *that* burdensome?
Yes, frankly. Not a lot of testers even keep a DVD-RW drive and media
around any more. It takes like a half hour just to write all the media
fo
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180917.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180919.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:115
Upgraded packages: 115
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 38.74 MiB
Size of dropped packages:4
On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 22:35 -0400, Harold Dost wrote:
> Is having this as a test criteria *that* burdensome?
Yes, frankly. Not a lot of testers even keep a DVD-RW drive and media
around any more. It takes like a half hour just to write all the media
for testing, then another few hours to run compl
On Thu, 2018-09-20 at 22:09 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:36 PM Harold Dost wrote:
> > Is having this as a test criteria *that* burdensome? Similar to another
> > blocker that was being proposed, maybe it's not something that _must_ be
> > tested, but if it's known to be
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:33:11 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> A few days later, and GNOME Shell is hardly usable anymore.
> Mouse lag, stuttering, wiindow usage taking seconds,
> itt gets slower and slower. Just watch these typos
> as a result of trying to compose this emai
A few days later, and GNOME Shell is hardly usable anymore.
Mouse lag, stuttering, wiindow usage taking seconds,
itt gets slower and slower. Just watch these typos
as a result of trying to compose this email. Spontaneous
key repetition because of major lag.
F29
On 9/21/18 11:02 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 9/21/18 9:14 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have had this problem pre beta images. This is the F29-armfhp code base.
I am running vnc server as a service. I have edited the xstartup to have:
# exec /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc
exec /bin/sh /etc/xdg/xfce4/
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 8:33 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 6:17 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:36 PM Harold Dost wrote:
>> >
>> > Is having this as a test criteria *that* burdensome? Similar to another
>> > blocker that was being proposed, maybe it's
On 9/21/18 9:14 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have had this problem pre beta images. This is the F29-armfhp code base.
>
> I am running vnc server as a service. I have edited the xstartup to have:
>
> # exec /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc
> exec /bin/sh /etc/xdg/xfce4/xinitrc
> xrdb $HOME/.Xresources
>
We had a thread earlier about how slow the DE is in the F29 beta and how
the an SELinux update made it 'better'. It did, but...
I am building a F28-armfhp image for my Cubieboard2. And WOW is it
peppier than F29.
Initial Setup:
On F29, the mouse is jumpy and when I finally can get to click
More issues think are related to this:
I cannot mount a USB drive.
I cannot unlock Printer Settings to setup a printer.
So maybe eventhough task 934 is polkit, something is not running right?
On 9/21/18 9:14 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have had this problem pre beta images. This is the F29-a
Hey All,
Many of you might have been using Java in one form other. Java folks and Fedora
QA is hosting a Java Test Day later this week.
We want you to test the different versions of Java and test if your application
and your general system is working as expected.
This instalment of Fedora Test D
I have had this problem pre beta images. This is the F29-armfhp code base.
I am running vnc server as a service. I have edited the xstartup to have:
# exec /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc
exec /bin/sh /etc/xdg/xfce4/xinitrc
xrdb $HOME/.Xresources
startxfce4 &
Note that currently, the is no .Xresources
Yesterday afternoon (9/20), I did a clean install of F29 Beta 1.5 onto
bare metal via DVD. The PC is a Lenovo M59P with an E8400 processor. The
ISO had been check-summed and passed. The PC booted fine and the media
test ran and passed. Anaconda ran perfectly and the install completed
normally.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 6:17 AM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:36 PM Harold Dost wrote:
> >
> > Is having this as a test criteria *that* burdensome? Similar to another
> blocker that was being proposed, maybe it's not something that _must_ be
> tested, but if it's known to be br
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:17 PM Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 01:49:20PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Justification:
> http://newsthump.com/2018/05/21/man-decides-to-keep-box-of-cables-hes-has-since-2002-for-another-year/
>
> More seriously: I don't think there are any syste
37 matches
Mail list logo
