Re: Tests of date formats needed

2018-03-26 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 03/26/2018 04:32 PM, Rafał Lużyński wrote: [...] Here is how to run gnome-shell in a different locale: LC_ALL=hr_HR.utf8 gnome-shell --replace & (of course, you can use a different locale, also you can use the export command and you won't have to repeat it every time). I already know

Re: Tests of date formats needed

2018-03-26 Thread Rafał Lużyński
Hi, Can anyone please convert the post I made here the other day into an official test documentation, at least for the next release? IIUC there was an i18n test day already and the testers were not asked to test the dates. I'm sorry about being unable to prepare such things on time. By the way: >

Re: ppp: FTBFS - should it be a beta blocker?

2018-03-26 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018, 00:42 Adam Williamson, wrote: > On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 15:19 +, Randy Barlow wrote: > > Greetings! > > > > During Friday's FESCo meeting we learned that ppp is currently FTBFS > > on Fedora 28/Rawhide[0]. FESCo was unsure if this particular failure > > would cause ppp to f

Fedora 28 updates-testing report

2018-03-26 Thread updates
The following Fedora 28 Security updates need testing: Age URL 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-bfdad62cd6 wireshark-2.4.5-3.fc28 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d305559481 mosquitto-1.4.15-1.fc28 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updat

Re: ppp: FTBFS - should it be a beta blocker?

2018-03-26 Thread Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
> On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 15:19 +, Randy Barlow wrote: > > Basically it'd require someone who uses ADSL via a dumb ADSL modem > plugged directly into their system via USB (*not* via an ADSL router > that their system is connected to via ethernet; in that configuration, > the router does this wor

Re: ppp: FTBFS - should it be a beta blocker?

2018-03-26 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 10:41:59 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 15:19 +, Randy Barlow wrote: > > Greetings! > > > > During Friday's FESCo meeting we learned that ppp is currently FTBFS > > on Fedora 28/Rawhide[0]. FESCo was unsure if this particular failure > > would cause

Re: Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-20180324.n.0.iso

2018-03-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 10:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 17:06 +, Alessio Ciregia wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 5:21 PM pmkel...@frontier.com > > wrote: > > > > > Since the Gnome 3.28.0 test object for today was delivered as > > > Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-

Re: ppp: FTBFS - should it be a beta blocker?

2018-03-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2018-03-25 at 15:19 +, Randy Barlow wrote: > Greetings! > > During Friday's FESCo meeting we learned that ppp is currently FTBFS > on Fedora 28/Rawhide[0]. FESCo was unsure if this particular failure > would cause ppp to fail in operation, or if it was simply a build > failure. Thus, w

Re: Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-20180324.n.0.iso

2018-03-26 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 17:06 +, Alessio Ciregia wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 5:21 PM pmkel...@frontier.com > wrote: > > > Since the Gnome 3.28.0 test object for today was delivered as > > Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-20180324.n.0.iso, I went ahead and did > > the rest of the testing. I

Fedora-Atomic 27-20180326.1 compose check report

2018-03-26 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj

Re: Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-20180324.n.0.iso

2018-03-26 Thread Alessio Ciregia
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 5:21 PM pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > Since the Gnome 3.28.0 test object for today was delivered as > Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-20180324.n.0.iso, I went ahead and did > the rest of the testing. I was surprised when I could not report the > results. relval said there

Fedora Rawhide-20180326.n.0 compose check report

2018-03-26 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 14/137 (x86_64), 7/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 211868 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211868 ID: 211900 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://open

Fedora 26 updates-testing report

2018-03-26 Thread updates
The following Fedora 26 Security updates need testing: Age URL 242 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ccb5c8d1e7 docker-distribution-2.6.2-1.git48294d9.fc26 74 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-66b885ae3c keycloak-httpd-client-install-0.8-1.fc26 61

Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-20180324.n.0.iso

2018-03-26 Thread pmkel...@frontier.com
Since the Gnome 3.28.0 test object for today was delivered as Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-28-20180324.n.0.iso, I went ahead and did the rest of the testing. I was surprised when I could not report the results. relval said there was no test event for 20180324.n.0. Did I do something wrong?

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180326.n.0 changes

2018-03-26 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180325.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180326.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 52 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 121.84 MiB Size of dropped packages:0